Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all

Has anyone had any experience with fuel cells and also surge tanks?

Im looking at buying one of each for an e85 set up with twin external walbro pumps.

Do these both need to be baffled inside?

What is the difference between ones for a few hundred to thousands??

Any recommendations of brands?

Is there any difference id need for e85 over petrol?

Anyone actually have pics in your car?

Thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/442564-fuel-cells-and-surge-tanks/
Share on other sites

The expensive ones have bladders, internal baffles, internal pick-ups etc whereas the cheap ones are just an empty tank. If you run a surge as well you can get away with the empty tank (and some get away with a basic cell and no surge though I wouldn't risk it) - the only benefit of the expensive ones in that case is the safety of a bladder. The empty cells are typically filled with foam, just make sure it's e85 safe.

Keep in mind plastic cells will deform if you don't use a functioning breather and support them properly whereas ally tanks are a little heavier. They all have their place, just weigh up the pros and cons and decide which best suits your particular application keeping in mind legality for the street or your racing class.

It was for my 19L poly surge tank, as long as the poly tank is completely full I won't need any foam or baffling. I just need to keep the twin Walbro's in the main tank for it to not empty, as the Fuelab is running 10an lines.

I ended up buying a Jaz brand tank.

Interesting arrangement, your min fuel load is going to be 20 litres then (empty main tank, full 'surge'). You will also need a large return line to the main tank from the poly tank to minimise pressure or it will balloon when it gets warm. I'm curious why you didn't use a conventional surge tank?

How long would a 2L surge tank last if the main tank pumps are sucking dry around corners? Not long was my theory. A surge tank needs to stay full, and my stupid saddlebag main fuel tank arrangement surges at 3/4 at the track.

19L would give me extra range on the road in a pinch also.

As for the return, I am using the 6an top breather fitting to take it back to the main tank. Should be enough considering the fuel rails return to the main tank. If it balloons I will make a sturdy alloy tank.

No worries Scotty, you've obviously thought it through so this is mainly for the OP's benefit. If you return the rails to the surge you have a near enough to full surge after a corner assuming it was full beforehand (without arguing semantics about partial throttle). And at wot with 500odd kW you're using well under 8L/min, and never at wot for more than 30sec without braking = 4L. Not to mention on the gas typically means a flooded pickup at the rear of a drag cell. Anyway just just some numbers I pulled from memory, it's easy enough to work out your actual fuel demand and some likely scenarios in a great deal more detail (circuit, 1000m drags and in car vids with telemetry etc) to design the surge tank around, in my case I ended up with 4L. Another point worth mentioning is surge tanks are typically tall relative to diameter/width (high aspect) so they can run down without the main pumps drawing air.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hope you aren't too sore after that one, might take a day or 2 to notice yet and I guess it is a loooooong drive home. On the bright side, tube frame front end is a thing at superlap, right?
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/p/18rmVb1SKB/ 
    • The chart of front pressure to rear pressure (with one being on the x axis and the other being on the y axis) is not a straight line on a typical proportioning valve. At lower pressures there is a straight line with one slope, and at higher pressures that changes to a lower slope. That creates a bend in the line at that pressure, called the knee point. If you do not change the proportionng as the pressure gets higher, you will suffer excessive pressure (at one end of the car or the other, depending on which way you look at the proportioning action) and then get lockups at that end. The HFM BM57, from my memory of previous discussions, is based on the BM57 from a different car (to a Skyline), with a different requirement for the location of the knee point and the distribution of pressure front to rear, and so is not a good choice for an upgrade on a Skyline. Here's a couple of links to some old posts, one from here, one from elsewhere. A lot of it pertains to adjustable prop valves, but the idea is the same. There are plenty of discussions on here about this issue from al the many years of people wanting a cheap/accessible option. https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/ https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/  
    • Yeah dunno why johhny posted that here with no context, just post on FB/insta bro where he put it up?  Laine had an off at T4 during Thurs prac, he's ok, car is less than perfect, they are done for the weekend, he can fill in the rest. Bando also binned it like 100m up the road.   
    • I feel there must have been a FB/insta post and the weekend did not start well at all I hope everyone is all okay
×
×
  • Create New...