Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

My thoughts are that the actual Nissan caliper is already over engineered on the Skyline range be it R32/33/34 or non Brembo GTRs.

Depending on what power you have, and what rubber you use, you may not need to upgrade the caliper. For the street id be very surprised if you ever ran out of brakes even with the std rotors.

So just be sure you are running good fluid, and good pads. if you want improved feel thru the pedal then get braided lines as well, and if you find you have brake problems then id say look at whether fitting bigger rotors will do the trick.

I am always on the lookout for bigger calipers, but for me its purely toss value as my R32 with 330mm front rotors, good pads, std calipers, braided lines and semi slick tyres has never even looked like fading at the track.

And on the street, then the extra expense is purely for stroke value to see the bigger rotors behind the rim...next on my stroke list is some flashy blue 6 pot calipers :wave: ...so all for brake upgrades, i after all have a brake fetish, but perhaps depending on your application not warranted.

The best brake upgrade in order to shorten stopping distances is good rubber. Are you aware that your car may not actually stop quicker with bigger brakes, the bigger brakes help consistancy more then actual stopiing distances...ill shut up now, ive rambled enough. :cheers:

I agree with Roy. The standard R33 brakes are the same size as R32GTRs so they cant be called small by any stretch.

The most logical question is WHY you want to upgrade? If you have found the brakes you have to be lacking then in what way?

If it is an issue of fading, most likely due to overheating then good pads, top quality fluid and potentially some decent discs should overcome any problems except perhaps the most extreme circuit use.

If it is a feel problem i.e. under hard braking the pedal seems spongy then a master cylinder brace would be the first step, followed by at least new brake hoses or possibly a step up to braided lines.

To get an idea of why, start your car, have someone sit in it and press as hard as they are able to on the brake pedal and watch the master cylinder flexing on the firewall. Often 5mm plus of flex is common and a brace eliminates that.

To answer Eds question. Stainless braided lines will not expand under high pressure like regular rubber brake hoses will. Rubber lines can look or feel great but even new ones will expand with pressure inside them, thereby reducing braking effectiveness.

My rant finished

Ed.... my experiences only, so not claiming that the following is qualified...

My thoughts are that braided brake lines are a bit of a wank. (yers i do have them and yet i still say it) Sure they are superior on paper... but to drive around with rubber then braided, on my car the difference in the feel of the brake pedal was influenced more by the brake pad i was running at the time.

At a circuit driving like a retard trying to be a "fully sik deep braker" i again could not honestly tell you there was any real difference in the pedal feel. :Oops:

It wasnt until recently with about 2 years more driving experience i was able to feel the difference/control brake lock up under hard braking by modulating the brake pedal after having driven a few other cars.

My experiences sure as hell werent back to back, or exact same cars bar the exclusion of braided lines... its just a hunch i now have having driven my car more, and after i have been fortunate enought to have driven others cars.

Maybe i was just a slower learner, or a few steps behind others when i first started driving around a circuit...but the things people say you NEED are lost on the average guy occassionally driving on the circuit....well at least they were on me. So sure do it, it is a much better equation, but if your like me you dont drive your car near hard enough to notice the difference

You need brackets to space the stock calipers out.

You could use Supra discs, they are 324mm, same dimensions as a GTST/GTT rotor except for the size and the center hole is around 6mm smaller.

You could get the supra DBA 5000 series and get the centre hole enlarged once.

Not sure about the legalities of using caliper brakects though.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...