Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Q: 2.5" cat-back vs. 3" cat-back... is the 3" any better? or do i get the 2.5" ??

when the tax return comes in, i will be in the market for a new cat-back exhaust...

currently i have a 3" dump/front on the standard r32 turbo, and have the stock cat-back into a 2.5" straight through muffler... won't ever be running more than 13 or 14psi through my FMIC (and with gtr cams this week!)

so brings me back to the question: do i go 2.5" cat-back or 3" cat-back?

for the exhaust flow i require will a 2.5" cat-back be sufficient? i have read articles of sr20's and other 2L engines making good power with a 2.5" exhaust so would 3" just bo overkill with unnecessary cabin resonance?

or will the extra diameter of the 3" over 2.5" make a big difference?

if i choose the 2.5" i can just change the pipe and leave my current muffler and that will save on money a bit...

what do you think?

remember its hanging off an rb20 not an rb25 so exhaust flow will be less.

cheers,

Waz.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/44306-25-vs-3/
Share on other sites

Depends what sort of power u are making with the 2.5".

Bonest stock my R32 made 115rwkw, stock everything.

I then had a fmic, bosh910 external pump, 3" turbo back exhaust with resonator and muffler fitted up, not all at once but near enough.

With the fuel sorted out ~12:1 AFR on 12.5psi (stock IC) it was making 152rwkw.

With the stock fueling (rich due to external pump) and 15psi (FMIC) the car made 155rwkw.

With the fuel sorted out ~12:1 AFR on 15psi (FMIC) it was making 164rwkw on a 30degree day.

I know dyno's are only tuning tool but it gives you a rough idea.

With the car running 12.5psi of boost and making 152rwkw it would accelerate as quick as a bone stock R33 GTR, we went on a few cruises also managed to grab a vid of one of the runs.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/44306-25-vs-3/#findComment-905603
Share on other sites

my RB20 runs a 3" dump/front pipe, cat and 3" Trust Power Extreme II exhaust

nice sound outside, quiet inside the cabin, actually improved the torque in the midrange significantly back when my car was stock and helped the responsiveness overall. a simple ECU remap improved that further. Now significantly modified, but exhaust is still good - if I had a 2.5" I would've needed to spend more $$ to get it changed.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/44306-25-vs-3/#findComment-906455
Share on other sites

It all depends what your final goals are.

I wish I didn't waste the $1650 this exhaust cost me around 2 years ago.

I went for a custom system as I didn't like the big arsed milo-tin look.

Its a nice sounding exhaust, not muffled so you can hear the nice purr when cruising along, doesn't get the cabin boom.

A WOT it is louder than most jap exhausts but it isn't loud enough to be annoying.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/44306-25-vs-3/#findComment-906523
Share on other sites

hmmm so the 3" sounds like a clear winner here...

what about going a custom exhaust (3" mandrel with cannon muffler and resonator - $450) versus a jap second hand exhaust (same specs) for about 500 probably

will there be any differences in cabin resonance? will i get a quieter sound from a trusty jap exhaust?

the exhaust shop that quoted me 450 also said that they make the exhaust sit higher than stock so it is not the lowest part of the car and makes it easier to lower the car later if i want :(

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/44306-25-vs-3/#findComment-906607
Share on other sites

Be carefull what mufflers that custom exhaust place is using, for a good quality cat back exhaust the cheapest I have been quoted is around $600, mild steel.

For a full turbo back exhaust inc. cat I was quoted around $1100 for mild steel.

Stainless jumps the price up to around $1500-1600.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/44306-25-vs-3/#findComment-907026
Share on other sites

For any give setup, 3" will flow better than 2.5" - alot better.

Is is worth it? well thats pretty objective, but IMHO, 3" wont hurt anything - 2.5 is smaller and therefore more likely to be restrictive. I have heard quiet 3" systems, and noisey 3" systems. The big problem is finding the balance. If you want quiet, it will always be at the sacrifice of power.

Your choice, do you want power or comfort? How much noise can you handle? I went through several cat back systems until I found one that was the right balance of power and noise.

Finally settled on a HKS super dragger, which is a nice balance for me.

Without knowing what an exhaust flows like - how restrictive it is, how can you know what to do. Remeber that back pressure will kill response, spoolup and peak power as well as mid range and bottom end. Simple rule with turbo cars, the better it flows, the better it is:)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/44306-25-vs-3/#findComment-907287
Share on other sites

For any give setup, 3" will flow better than 2.5" - alot better.

Is is worth it?  well thats pretty objective, but IMHO, 3" wont hurt anything - 2.5 is smaller and therefore more likely to be restrictive.  I have heard quiet 3" systems, and noisey 3" systems.  The big problem is finding the balance.   If you want quiet, it will always be at the sacrifice of power.

Your choice, do you want power or comfort?  How much noise can you handle?  I went through several cat back systems until I found one that was the right balance of power and noise.

Finally settled on a HKS super dragger, which is a nice balance for me.

Without knowing what an exhaust flows like - how restrictive it is, how can you know what to do.  Remeber that back pressure will kill response, spoolup and peak power as well as mid range and bottom end.  Simple rule with turbo cars, the better it flows, the better it is:)

thanks mate, as always a thorough response.

my gtr cams went in today so the exhaust really has to go soon so i can get those exhaust gasses out quickly!

2 questions:

- how low does the super dragger hang?

- cannon mufflers: are they any better/worse for flow/noise than a larger muffler? (assuming they are both 3" straight through)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/44306-25-vs-3/#findComment-907459
Share on other sites

The super dragger seems to hang about as low as other cat back systems I had fitted, but the rear muffler is pretty fat and sits a bit lower than the others.

As for muffler type, I really think it comes back to design again. The design of the through pipe, what sort of material is being used and size/length would all have an impact. Bit of a black art to me - thats why I just went with swap a few until I found a good one. I even tried an N1 style that was louder than a straight 90mm pipe!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/44306-25-vs-3/#findComment-909295
Share on other sites

I recently upgraded my 2.5" system which was starting to rattle and sound dodgy. Picked up a second hand 3" HKS Super Drager system which was in pretty decent nick (bar a few scratches and scrapes from speedbumps) for $350 and got it fitted. I mainly expected an improvement in sound, but the car feels so much nicer to drive now, with better midrange.

I think it cost me about $450 all up after fitting. Bargain!

Red17

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/44306-25-vs-3/#findComment-909387
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Even with the piston at TDC there was room for it to drop, but I don't think it can drop fully into the cylinder, the problem you have is that you need something pushing against the valve to hold it up so you have enough room to put the new stem seal on and the spring etc.  I used compressed air only because putting rope in the cylinder seemed a bit risky to me, I know people have done it countless times before like this. Overall it's a pain in the ass job. Honestly you'd probably be better off taking the head off because the risk of dropping something in the engine and the finicky-ness of it all is very stressful. If you are going to attempt it though i 10000% recommend a 36050 valve spring/keeper tool. I had both the traditional lever type and after doing 1 cylinder it was absolute pain to get those valve keepers in place, even with 2 people. That 36050 is amazing, you do have to push hard to get them in place but it works perfectly almost every time. Back to my actual issue I think my engine is just tired and old and the rings have gone bad. The comp numbers (cold, no oil) were: Cyl 1 -129psi Cyl 2 - 133psi Cyl 3 - 138psi Cyl 4 - 137psi Cyl 5 - 157psi Cyl 6 - 142psi   Cylinder 5 and 6 having the most carbon on them.
    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
×
×
  • Create New...