Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Q: 2.5" cat-back vs. 3" cat-back... is the 3" any better? or do i get the 2.5" ??

when the tax return comes in, i will be in the market for a new cat-back exhaust...

currently i have a 3" dump/front on the standard r32 turbo, and have the stock cat-back into a 2.5" straight through muffler... won't ever be running more than 13 or 14psi through my FMIC (and with gtr cams this week!)

so brings me back to the question: do i go 2.5" cat-back or 3" cat-back?

for the exhaust flow i require will a 2.5" cat-back be sufficient? i have read articles of sr20's and other 2L engines making good power with a 2.5" exhaust so would 3" just bo overkill with unnecessary cabin resonance?

or will the extra diameter of the 3" over 2.5" make a big difference?

if i choose the 2.5" i can just change the pipe and leave my current muffler and that will save on money a bit...

what do you think?

remember its hanging off an rb20 not an rb25 so exhaust flow will be less.

cheers,

Waz.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/44306-25-vs-3/
Share on other sites

Depends what sort of power u are making with the 2.5".

Bonest stock my R32 made 115rwkw, stock everything.

I then had a fmic, bosh910 external pump, 3" turbo back exhaust with resonator and muffler fitted up, not all at once but near enough.

With the fuel sorted out ~12:1 AFR on 12.5psi (stock IC) it was making 152rwkw.

With the stock fueling (rich due to external pump) and 15psi (FMIC) the car made 155rwkw.

With the fuel sorted out ~12:1 AFR on 15psi (FMIC) it was making 164rwkw on a 30degree day.

I know dyno's are only tuning tool but it gives you a rough idea.

With the car running 12.5psi of boost and making 152rwkw it would accelerate as quick as a bone stock R33 GTR, we went on a few cruises also managed to grab a vid of one of the runs.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/44306-25-vs-3/#findComment-905603
Share on other sites

my RB20 runs a 3" dump/front pipe, cat and 3" Trust Power Extreme II exhaust

nice sound outside, quiet inside the cabin, actually improved the torque in the midrange significantly back when my car was stock and helped the responsiveness overall. a simple ECU remap improved that further. Now significantly modified, but exhaust is still good - if I had a 2.5" I would've needed to spend more $$ to get it changed.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/44306-25-vs-3/#findComment-906455
Share on other sites

It all depends what your final goals are.

I wish I didn't waste the $1650 this exhaust cost me around 2 years ago.

I went for a custom system as I didn't like the big arsed milo-tin look.

Its a nice sounding exhaust, not muffled so you can hear the nice purr when cruising along, doesn't get the cabin boom.

A WOT it is louder than most jap exhausts but it isn't loud enough to be annoying.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/44306-25-vs-3/#findComment-906523
Share on other sites

hmmm so the 3" sounds like a clear winner here...

what about going a custom exhaust (3" mandrel with cannon muffler and resonator - $450) versus a jap second hand exhaust (same specs) for about 500 probably

will there be any differences in cabin resonance? will i get a quieter sound from a trusty jap exhaust?

the exhaust shop that quoted me 450 also said that they make the exhaust sit higher than stock so it is not the lowest part of the car and makes it easier to lower the car later if i want :(

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/44306-25-vs-3/#findComment-906607
Share on other sites

Be carefull what mufflers that custom exhaust place is using, for a good quality cat back exhaust the cheapest I have been quoted is around $600, mild steel.

For a full turbo back exhaust inc. cat I was quoted around $1100 for mild steel.

Stainless jumps the price up to around $1500-1600.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/44306-25-vs-3/#findComment-907026
Share on other sites

For any give setup, 3" will flow better than 2.5" - alot better.

Is is worth it? well thats pretty objective, but IMHO, 3" wont hurt anything - 2.5 is smaller and therefore more likely to be restrictive. I have heard quiet 3" systems, and noisey 3" systems. The big problem is finding the balance. If you want quiet, it will always be at the sacrifice of power.

Your choice, do you want power or comfort? How much noise can you handle? I went through several cat back systems until I found one that was the right balance of power and noise.

Finally settled on a HKS super dragger, which is a nice balance for me.

Without knowing what an exhaust flows like - how restrictive it is, how can you know what to do. Remeber that back pressure will kill response, spoolup and peak power as well as mid range and bottom end. Simple rule with turbo cars, the better it flows, the better it is:)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/44306-25-vs-3/#findComment-907287
Share on other sites

For any give setup, 3" will flow better than 2.5" - alot better.

Is is worth it?  well thats pretty objective, but IMHO, 3" wont hurt anything - 2.5 is smaller and therefore more likely to be restrictive.  I have heard quiet 3" systems, and noisey 3" systems.  The big problem is finding the balance.   If you want quiet, it will always be at the sacrifice of power.

Your choice, do you want power or comfort?  How much noise can you handle?  I went through several cat back systems until I found one that was the right balance of power and noise.

Finally settled on a HKS super dragger, which is a nice balance for me.

Without knowing what an exhaust flows like - how restrictive it is, how can you know what to do.  Remeber that back pressure will kill response, spoolup and peak power as well as mid range and bottom end.  Simple rule with turbo cars, the better it flows, the better it is:)

thanks mate, as always a thorough response.

my gtr cams went in today so the exhaust really has to go soon so i can get those exhaust gasses out quickly!

2 questions:

- how low does the super dragger hang?

- cannon mufflers: are they any better/worse for flow/noise than a larger muffler? (assuming they are both 3" straight through)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/44306-25-vs-3/#findComment-907459
Share on other sites

The super dragger seems to hang about as low as other cat back systems I had fitted, but the rear muffler is pretty fat and sits a bit lower than the others.

As for muffler type, I really think it comes back to design again. The design of the through pipe, what sort of material is being used and size/length would all have an impact. Bit of a black art to me - thats why I just went with swap a few until I found a good one. I even tried an N1 style that was louder than a straight 90mm pipe!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/44306-25-vs-3/#findComment-909295
Share on other sites

I recently upgraded my 2.5" system which was starting to rattle and sound dodgy. Picked up a second hand 3" HKS Super Drager system which was in pretty decent nick (bar a few scratches and scrapes from speedbumps) for $350 and got it fitted. I mainly expected an improvement in sound, but the car feels so much nicer to drive now, with better midrange.

I think it cost me about $450 all up after fitting. Bargain!

Red17

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/44306-25-vs-3/#findComment-909387
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
    • You just need a wheel alignment after, so just set them to the same as current and drive to the shop. As there are 2 upper links it may also be worth adding adjustable upper front links at the same time; these reduce bump steer when you move the camber (note that setting those correctly takes a lot longer as you have to recheck the camber at each length of the toe arm, through a range of movement, so you could just ignore that unless the handling becomes unpredictable)
    • I got adjustable after market rear camber arm to replace the stock one's because got sick of having to buy new rear tyres every few months. Can anyone please let me know what the best adjustment length would be. I don't have the old ones anymore to get measurements. I'm guessing the stock measurement minus a few mm would do it. Please any help on replacing them would be fantastic I've watched the YouTube clips but no-one talks about how long to set the camber arm to.
    • Heh. I copied the link to the video direct, instead of the thread I mentioned. But the video is the main value content anyway. Otherwise, yes, in Europe, surely you'd be expected to buy local. Being whichever flavour of Michelin, Continental or Pirelli suits your usage model.
×
×
  • Create New...