Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've just recently purchased a Blitz i-Colour Spec-R boost controller. I have gone through the installation manual and I'm still a bit confused on how to Install it.

I have a twin turbo set up gt2860r -5.

Now my question is- Would I need to tap in a fitting for the hoses on the compressor hosing on both turbos?

There is a diagram In the manual. The solanoid Unit has a Out/In. (Out) T's off and goes to the valve on both actuators and (In) Looks like its T's off into both compressor housings.

Instead of taking off the turbos and tapping in fittings for the (In) is there another way?

Thanks.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/443426-dual-solanoid-for-gtr/
Share on other sites

You should take the boost signal to the gauge from the inlet manifold.

The line to the waste gates via the solenoid should be done as GTSBoy has said.

As per the diagram the blue line is the pressure source that should go to the new solenoid then waste gates.

Edited by Ben C34

The boost source is the green pipe labeled>

"To bottom of collector, boost source"

The blue pipe simply connects to the induction pipework ahead of the turbo inlets.

Good point . The blue is the return for the bled air back to the engine for emissions requirements. Can't vent anything to the atmosphere!

Note that the first part of this discussion uses the word "plenum" in the sense of the plenum on most cars, not the GTR. The multiple throttles are a complication. So in the above posts the term "inlet manifold" was used. I take that to mean "after the throttles" in the GTR. In any other RB the plenum is after the throttles.

For the purposes of driving a wastegate you want to measure the boost pressure upstream the throttle. If you measure it downstream the throttle then with a partially closed throttle you may have a situation where the pressure in the plenum is much lower than the target boost level but the pressure upstream the throttle is higher. This situation cannot continue indefinitely, but it can exist. At this time the EBC would be trying to close the wastegate to raise the boost (because it's measuring low) but in reality the turbo is pumping more pressure. Because the pressure at the turbo outlet is high but the flow is low (part closed throttle) then you may approach the surge line on the compressor map.

What you actually want is for the EBC to try to maintain the boost that the turbo is making at or less than the max boost you want, rather than allowing the turbo to spin away, effectively uncontrolled.

Now, I acknowledge that a partially closed throttle means that the power output of the engine is under the control of the driver and he is clearly asking for less than max power. It also means that the flow of exhaust gases is being modulated and is therefore less than you would have at WOT. But I think we can all appreciate that under these circumstances you would need a larger proportion of the exhaust flow to go out via the wastegate than the turbine. If the EBC is trying to raise the boost level in the plenum though, then the wastegate will be more closed than needed, meaning more flow through the turbine, meaning more compressor speed. So even with the concept of the driver's ankle being in control, there is a strong possibility of overdriving the turbo relative to what it needs. So we get back to the possibility of surge.

Whether the problem occurs or not may well come down to relative sizing of wastegate to turbine and matching of the exhaust side to the compressor side, which is a lot of variables to play with.

It's all avoided by hooking up the boost signal for the EBC from the turbo outlets.

In a GTR, the plenum is functionally equivalent to the turbo outlet relative to the throttle location, so long as the original throttles are still in use. Single TB conversions are the same as any other RB.

If, in the GTR, the original boost control solenoid is hooked up to the plenum, then that's fine. If it's hooked up to the inlet manifold (which would be the vacuum balance tube underneath) then that opens it all up to the problem I describe above.

Yup, if that connection is to the plenum itself.

In this case though, whilst it will be easier to do that (on the assumption that the standard location is there and available) you'd get better boost control response by keeping all the lines on one side of the engine. Shorter pipes means less pneumatic delay. The original GTR boost control system had to have one pipe go all the way around the engine. But in RB25s and so on, the boost control solenoid was right next to the turbo, for good reason.

FWIW though, the difference won't be terrible and would still work fine.

Instead of tapping fittings on the turbo compressor housing and going through all the trouble of taking out the turbos. I think I might just end up tapping fittings on both of the pipes that leads out from the housing Where all the decompression charge happens. Less parts to take off and easier. Thanks for your inputs.

I recent bought a Greddy Profec Boost Controller and was getting confussed on how to set it up because greddy instructions say to go off the fuel pressure regulator for a signal for the sensor unit. But reading different threads and watching Mighty Car Mods it seems to be a bad practice as you don't want to wreck this signal.

Below I have added my setup which im thinking of doing to my r33 gtr, Just wondering if it would work?

post-120471-0-34691200-1400673227_thumb.jpg

Greddy Setup

post-120471-0-85269500-1400673606_thumb.jpg

Thanks for your input and thanks Fat32gtr and everyone that has put input into this thread so far.

Do not confuse the boost source used for control with the boost source used for display.

The Profec, like most EBCs, is not a closed loop controller. If you look at the installation instructions carefully you will see that the boost signal line they recommend you connect to the FPR signal line is not involved in control at all. it is only the signal that goes to the MAP sensor in the Profec head unit, used for display of boost in the manifold. The actual control boost signal is drawn from the turbo outlet, as shown in their diagram, and the same as instructions given above.

There is very good reason for not tee-ing into the FPR signal line. if nothing goes wrong, then there is no problem. But if you tee in a nice long boost signal hose and it melts or splits or whatever, then you will have a nasty leak in the FPR sense line and your mixtures could go nastily out of control (ie, lean). Not desirable. I think Greddy only recommend that you tee the Profec MAP signal line into there because it is one place that the know will be available on every car that the Profec might get installed into. Saves having to describe a whole bunch of different possibilities for manifold tapping locations.

So for the sensor unit signal to supply the control unit can I tee into the factory boost line that supply the gauges inside the car.

And then in my drawing above not tee into the boost source line which go's from the solenoid to the plenum?

Um....yeah. The GTR is complicated. If you hook the sensor up to the plenum you will never read vacuum, because the vacuum is all on the other side of the throttles. So tee the sensor into the other existing boost gauge lines and you will have a true manifold pressure signal.

And the actuator control signal can come from the plenum but would be better coming from closer to the turbo outlets. Your choice.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...