Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I purchased a set of brand new Bilstein B6 dampers for my R33 approximately 4,000km ago. Obviously these are not height adjustable, but are complemented by a set of King Spring 'Lows' to give the car a slightly lower CG and better looks.

I would like to machine some circlip grooves for the lower spring perch to further lower the car approximately 15-20mm. I understand the relationship between height and handling, so no need for an explanation on that.

My question is, does lowering a gas-charged shock absorber which is still relatively new pose any danger as far as shortening its life or causing damage to the valving/internals? Obviously the dampers compression stroke would be reduced, and this is my biggest concern as far as longevity and durability.

Cheers!!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/444304-lowering-bilstein-dampers-damage/
Share on other sites

15-20mm is too far. SK's kit B6s (of which I have just installed a set of 4 on my R32) have extra grooves machined in above and below the original pair. These are only ~5mm apart, so you get about an extra 10mm up and down.

I found that Kings lows (KDFL-101 and KDRL-102) sat my car ~30mm too low even when setting the spring perches in the highest grooves. I had to go to GTR springs KDFL-116 7 KDRL-87SP and set the perches in the bottom original slot in order to get the ride height perfect (in line with both what SK recommend and what is also legal in SA). That gives me about 355mm at the front and 350 at the rear.

There is no way that a lower CG and looks is worth compromising the handling of the car that much by dropping it as far as you are asking for. How high is it now?

  • Like 1

Well try this for a trick. Put the car on full lock (ie turn hard left) and stick your head under the guard. Look to see how much shock travel you have at the current ride height. If you like you can try and measure the height between the top of the damper and the bottom gof the bump stop. Then have a think about how much travel you will have when the ride height is 20mm lower......

Cheers guys.

GTSboy, the car is currently sitting at roughly 345mm both front and rear. I actually had a set of grooves machined to my specification to give the car an extra ~5mm of forward rake. I was thinking of going an extra 10mm lower to 335 front and rear.

djr, I'll have a look today, but you're both probably right, 20mm lower will be excessive.

I'm still interested in my original question though, does operating a new damper in the final few inches of its travel cause damage to the valve stack, piston or any other components?

Agreed. Provided it doesn't hit the internal bump stops you're OK. The actual position in the travel doesn't determine the way the damper operates at all. The valving is all about piston speed.

Way back in the way backs, when we used to lower HQ (and similar) Holdens until the front crossmember was ploughing grooves in the road, you'd buy dampers (sorry, back then they were shockies) with a shorter body simply so they'd run closer to the middle of stroke and avoid the internal bump stops.

Of course we usually had air shockers in the rear.......

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Bit of a pity we don't have good images of the back/front of the PCB ~ that said, I found a YT vid of a teardown to replace dicky clock switches, and got enough of a glimpse to realize this PCB is the front-end to a connected to what I'll call PCBA, and as such this is all digital on this PCB..ergo, battery voltage probably doesn't make an appearance here ; that is, I'd expect them to do something on PCBA wrt power conditioning for the adjustment/display/switch PCB.... ....given what's transpired..ie; some permutation of 12vdc on a 5vdc with or without correct polarity...would explain why the zener said "no" and exploded. The transistor Q5 (M33) is likely to be a digital switching transistor...that is, package has builtin bias resistors to ensure it saturates as soon as base threshold voltage is reached (minimal rise/fall time)....and wrt the question 'what else could've fried?' ....well, I know there's an MCU on this board (display, I/O at a guess), and you hope they isolated it from this scenario...I got my crayons out, it looks a bit like this...   ...not a lot to see, or rather, everything you'd like to see disappears down a via to the other side...base drive for the transistor comes from somewhere else, what this transistor is switching is somewhere else...but the zener circuit is exclusive to all this ~ it's providing a set voltage (current limited by the 1K3 resistor R19)...and disappears somewhere else down the via I marked V out ; if the errant voltage 'jumped' the diode in the millisecond before it exploded, whatever that V out via feeds may have seen a spike... ....I'll just imagine that Q5 was switched off at the time, thus no damage should've been done....but whatever that zener feeds has to be checked... HTH
    • I think Fitmit had some, have a look on there (theyre Australian as well)
    • Hah, fair enough! But if you learn with this one you can drive any other OEM manual. No modern luxury features like auto rev-matching or hillstart assist to give you a false sense of confidence. And a heavy car with not that much torque so it stalls easily. 
    • Actually, I'd say all three are the automatic option. Just the different trim levels. The manual would be RSFS, no? 
×
×
  • Create New...