Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I purchased a set of brand new Bilstein B6 dampers for my R33 approximately 4,000km ago. Obviously these are not height adjustable, but are complemented by a set of King Spring 'Lows' to give the car a slightly lower CG and better looks.

I would like to machine some circlip grooves for the lower spring perch to further lower the car approximately 15-20mm. I understand the relationship between height and handling, so no need for an explanation on that.

My question is, does lowering a gas-charged shock absorber which is still relatively new pose any danger as far as shortening its life or causing damage to the valving/internals? Obviously the dampers compression stroke would be reduced, and this is my biggest concern as far as longevity and durability.

Cheers!!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/444304-lowering-bilstein-dampers-damage/
Share on other sites

15-20mm is too far. SK's kit B6s (of which I have just installed a set of 4 on my R32) have extra grooves machined in above and below the original pair. These are only ~5mm apart, so you get about an extra 10mm up and down.

I found that Kings lows (KDFL-101 and KDRL-102) sat my car ~30mm too low even when setting the spring perches in the highest grooves. I had to go to GTR springs KDFL-116 7 KDRL-87SP and set the perches in the bottom original slot in order to get the ride height perfect (in line with both what SK recommend and what is also legal in SA). That gives me about 355mm at the front and 350 at the rear.

There is no way that a lower CG and looks is worth compromising the handling of the car that much by dropping it as far as you are asking for. How high is it now?

  • Like 1

Well try this for a trick. Put the car on full lock (ie turn hard left) and stick your head under the guard. Look to see how much shock travel you have at the current ride height. If you like you can try and measure the height between the top of the damper and the bottom gof the bump stop. Then have a think about how much travel you will have when the ride height is 20mm lower......

Cheers guys.

GTSboy, the car is currently sitting at roughly 345mm both front and rear. I actually had a set of grooves machined to my specification to give the car an extra ~5mm of forward rake. I was thinking of going an extra 10mm lower to 335 front and rear.

djr, I'll have a look today, but you're both probably right, 20mm lower will be excessive.

I'm still interested in my original question though, does operating a new damper in the final few inches of its travel cause damage to the valve stack, piston or any other components?

Agreed. Provided it doesn't hit the internal bump stops you're OK. The actual position in the travel doesn't determine the way the damper operates at all. The valving is all about piston speed.

Way back in the way backs, when we used to lower HQ (and similar) Holdens until the front crossmember was ploughing grooves in the road, you'd buy dampers (sorry, back then they were shockies) with a shorter body simply so they'd run closer to the middle of stroke and avoid the internal bump stops.

Of course we usually had air shockers in the rear.......

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • How dare you sell your unreliable Skyline and buy a reliable, Toyota/Yamaha car with a strong gearbox, torsen LSD and Toyota reliability. At least you won't need to worry about oil pumps, big catch can, oil restrictors, blowing off power steering belts, sheering off 3rd gear, failing ABS relays/pumps, etc.
    • Hope you aren't too sore after that one, might take a day or 2 to notice yet and I guess it is a loooooong drive home. On the bright side, tube frame front end is a thing at superlap, right?
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/p/18rmVb1SKB/ 
    • The chart of front pressure to rear pressure (with one being on the x axis and the other being on the y axis) is not a straight line on a typical proportioning valve. At lower pressures there is a straight line with one slope, and at higher pressures that changes to a lower slope. That creates a bend in the line at that pressure, called the knee point. If you do not change the proportionng as the pressure gets higher, you will suffer excessive pressure (at one end of the car or the other, depending on which way you look at the proportioning action) and then get lockups at that end. The HFM BM57, from my memory of previous discussions, is based on the BM57 from a different car (to a Skyline), with a different requirement for the location of the knee point and the distribution of pressure front to rear, and so is not a good choice for an upgrade on a Skyline. Here's a couple of links to some old posts, one from here, one from elsewhere. A lot of it pertains to adjustable prop valves, but the idea is the same. There are plenty of discussions on here about this issue from al the many years of people wanting a cheap/accessible option. https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/ https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/learn-me-brake-proportioning-valves/236880/page1/  
    • Yeah dunno why johhny posted that here with no context, just post on FB/insta bro where he put it up?  Laine had an off at T4 during Thurs prac, he's ok, car is less than perfect, they are done for the weekend, he can fill in the rest. Bando also binned it like 100m up the road.   
×
×
  • Create New...