Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys I have a r34 GTT with a power fc just the stage 1 mods, and suddenly the engine light started flashing at around 5500rpm and is if there is like a boost cut.

I instantly thought it was knock and grabbed the hand controller and it was only like 10.

So I thought it might have been the injectors maxing out for some weird reason but they are at 92%.

Air Meter at 5100, I swapped over the AFM with a spare that I have and it's still doing it.

Next step I disabled the Injector warning - Still flashed.

Disabled the AFM warning - still flashed.

Turned the o2 sensor function off - still flashed.

What the hell could it be I have no idea, please help, thanks.

It depends what the warning is set out. You can set it to go off at whatever you like

The map sensor is for the boost control kit but does work without it. If you bring boost up on the hand controller and its got lines instead of a figure then you don't have the map sensor. I dont think you do but had to ask. I'm not even sure if it flashes the engine light anyway.

  • 2 months later...

Hey guys well it started again arhhh.

Weird although I have noticed that it mainly does it in the rain???

At about 4000 rpm mainly in 2nd engine light flashes car feels like it just turned off and back on then I back off.

I once thought fark it lets see what happens and it hesitates for a few milliseconds then goes fine, I'll attach a photo of my peak hold off my power FC if that helps at all.

I'm thinking either clogged injectors or is my fuel pump getting weak? if you think it's the fuel pump how can I test that?

Thanks for any help in advance.

post-84648-0-75046700-1409140813_thumb.jpg

Your airflow is getting borderline out of range (high)

Your injectors are borderline of reaching maximum

Both may be within the warning set in the Power FC. Depends what the tuner has set them to

Doesn't explain the problem with the drive from the car, but will explain the warning light I'd say. The Tuner may have set them at those levels, without FC-Edit to look at the settings then

If it were me, I'd be getting a Z32 AFM and some bigger injectors, then trying to troubleshoot the problem, because looks like what you have now is not quite enough to do the job safely. It may be a problem with the AFM, and you may find that spending $200-$400 on a Z32 AFM might solve your problem anyway.

Without more information though its hard to say for sure. It may be worth talking to your tuner about it so he can see the car and experience the problem

Yeah true, what trips me out though is that the car has been tuned like this for the past 2 years and now all of a sudden this is happening, I've tried 2 different AFM and 2 different o2 sensors just incase and same thing is happening, running the same boost and all, well I'm sooning aiming for my stage 2 upgrade, hopefully get near 300rwkw just stuck on which turbo to get, and which injectors, are the r34 injectors side feed or top feed? thanks.

Lose the whole 'stage 1' upgrades, etc.

Tune's dont always stay 100% perfect, in fact most of the time they dont. Differing temperatures for example will make a difference. Colder winter then normal for one

As the engine wears it will probably make a difference as well

It would be better to log data on a laptop and see exactly what the car is doing when the problem occurs. Hence why it would be a good idea to go see your tuner, see what he thinks. Becuase chances are he has seen it before

What you can try do is disable the ECU from giving warnings if your AFM or injectors are at peak. What I would do next is have the control in the mode which lets you view the sensors and if the ECU triggers a warning have a passenger watch the screen closely to see if one of the triggers switches off. If the ECU is throwing an issue, it can be reported by the hand controller, whether it be a threshold limit or a component failure.

Ahh k so put it in the sensors mode correct? And watch for one of the little circles to either come on or off yeah? It's not the light that bothers me I just don't want to blow anything - don't have the time or money for that atm.

It just trips me out as to why it mainly happens when it's raining and why all of a sudden if you get where I'm coming from, and also that little jurk that I get when the engine light does flash and what causes that? I'm thinking maybe as a safety precaution it's like a Rev limiter.

the engine light in my r33 flickers at times when im pushing past the 7,000rpm mainly in 3rd n 4th. Knock doesnt register any higher or go up when the light flashes, no engine damage or failures have happened and i have more than enough fuel and headroom with my setup. I've sort of learnt to ignore it and focus on knock readings

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...