Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

firstly, i've researched alot and this is more for second opinion.

I'm moving to a signle turbo high mount set-up, i looked into GT3582R, 5858, 6262, and GTX3076. My mechanic reckons 3082's the way to go, but im of the mind that a GTX3076 is what im looking for, im aiming for a responsive 320-340awkw on 98. my plan is T3 6boost mani, into GTX3076r .82 A/R into 3.5"dump back exhaust. It just seems that the 82 housing is too large on a GT30, plus garret doesnt advertise them so custom match nowadays?

From what ive plotted on the compressor map i believe the GTX3076 is what im looking for. My question, is it worth going T3 split pulse and twin scroll, will it actually affect response? or just go single scroll T3? or would going the 3082 with twinscroll T4 be on the money?

Additionally will going to the 1.06 A/R be noticably laggier given the relatively small/light compressor housing? worth looking into to meet my power/response goal. The car is my daily but will be seing track work.

cheers in advance

Dan

PS please dont say go -9s

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/444566-gt30-turbine-housing-options/
Share on other sites

Assuming you're running the R32 V Spec in your sig.

GTX3576 with 0.82 T4 split pulse should be close to the mark.

I'm not entirely sold on the GTX3076 combination, but a single scroll T3 1.06 housing should give some good turbine flow capacity for high rpm breathing efficiency. I'd think a 0.82 housing would restrict the usable rev range - not what I'd want from a RB26.

RB26 won't pull too hard under 3500 anyway, but either of the suggested combinations should do a fair job between 4000 and 8000rpm plus.

There is probably 200 rpm difference between the .82 and 1.06 from my experience. The larger housing will feel much punchier when it comes on as it will improve top end torque.

Why 98? A GTX3071 would do that power if you went ethanol, with much better response.

Thanks for the feedback.

Dale good point, i having been studying the compressor maps, and it seems to point that the GTX3576 is at higher efficiency at fractionally lower airflow, but overall slightly less responsive, although twinscroll .82 i thionk would be a pretty nice steup.

Scotty - im planning on 98 since ill be posting to Wagga Wagga next year for 12 months and will not have access to ethenol fuel. i anticipate once i move back to Brissy on moving to an e-flex setup.

i was unable to find a Garret T4 divided housing option for the GTX30/35's though, is that an ATP rear housing option or something?

Cheers

Dan

I am surprised I am the first to suggest this, however a FP 3582HTA with a garden variety T3 housing would likely be a much better thing all over.

In a previous results thread it was back to backed on some form of Audi, showcasing that the 3582HTA spooled closer to a GT3076 but was roughly on par for power with a GT3582.

Now I don't want to the one to flog a dead horse, though the 76mm GTX wheel hasn't really had any big wins with anything we've seen so far. Certainly not like we have seen from the GTX3071 nor GTX3582. I believe even the GTX3576 result on this forum wasn't overly 'wow', either.

Just going to drop this here:

http://store.forcedperformance.net/merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&Store_Code=FP&Product_Code=NTGT3582HTA&Category_Code=Turbo-FP

I fit my old GTX3076 into a customers 34 the other week, using a Kando rear housing, it made 380kw with a built auto at 25% slip. It maxed Trent's hub dyno putting it into emergency shutdown due to the massive torque it produced. I think people are giving the 76 the raw end of the stick personally.

damn, thats pretty nice Scotty. im guessing ujsing an ethanol based fuel?

i Looked at the HTAs, the 3582 is bigger then what im looking for; this is a DD with a little trackwork but the daily part really is the considering factor, but the HTA3076 looks like its a nice peice of kit. Does anyone have any experience dealing directly with FP? i;ve heard people say they can take weeks and weeks to "prepare and deliver" products, i understand theyre overseas, but... i dont want to wait a month after order. plus im not sure if the extra $$ will be justified vs a GTX, there surely cant be THAT much difference between them (yes they are different compressor specs)

it has gotten me thinking though.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'm looking for some real world experiences/feed back from anyone who has personally ran a EFR7670 with a 1.05 exhaust housing or a .83 I'm leaning towards the .83 because its a street car used mostly for spirited driving in the canyons roads. I"m not looking for big numbers on paper. I want a responsive powerband that will be very linear to 8000 rpm. I dont mind if power remains somewhat flat but dont want power to drop off on top. The turbo I've purchased is a 1.05, although the mounting flange T3 vs T4 and internal vs external waste gates are different on both housings, I not concern about swapping parts or making fabrication mods to get what I want. Based on some of the research I've done with chat gpt, the 1.05 housing seems to be the way to go with slightly more lag and future proofing for more mods but recommends .83 for best response/street car setup. AI doesn't have the same emotions as real people driving a GTR so I think you guys will be able to give me better feed back 😀   
    • Surely somebody has one in VIC. Have you asked at any shops?  Is this the yearly inspection or did you get a canary?
    • This is where I share pain with you, @Duncan. The move to change so many cooling system pieces to plastic is a killer! Plastic end tanks and a few plastic hose flanges on my car's fail after so little time.  Curious about the need for a bigger rad, is that just for long sessions in the summer or because the car generally needs more cooling?
    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
×
×
  • Create New...