Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The other thing to look at is -5s on a 2.6 will come on later in the rev range so the motor will disapate the boost better meaning you can get away with a higher CR, also what cams are you planning on cause same goes there, the bigger duration the higher CR you can use

Round ones LOL!!! :D

These ones

post-36620-0-69992500-1403582118_thumb.jpg

The other thing to look at is -5s on a 2.6 will come on later in the rev range so the motor will disapate the boost better meaning you can get away with a higher CR, also what cams are you planning on cause same goes there, the bigger duration the higher CR you can use

Round ones LOL!!! :D

These ones

attachicon.gifimage.jpg

Square piston engine?

http://thekneeslider.com/the-hossack-engine-a-square-piston-two-stroke/

ba ha ha ha h///

If you consider the Mine's car, that ran 2.6L with 2530's (slightly more responsive to the -5's). Maybe look at what compression/specs it had. I know the videos were based on the fancy diff but still a hell of an engine.

... that was ALOT of fine development, the kind of r$d that costs a lot for minimal results, but in that case the multiple of minimal results, resulted in a very cohesive package.

... static CR would only have been one small part of it.

- for my thought's on 98, I'd prefer the 'buffer' of 8.XXX:1 rather than 9.XXX:1 with -5's. Just for that bad batch of fuel, hot day etc variables. the few hundred rpm difference in boost threshold is worth the extra safety margin for me in a street-able car on 98 with low mounts.

- at the end of the day it's probably much the muchness depending on who and how hard it's tuned.

J.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Oh, also, forgot to add these photos I believe.
    • Thought i'd update on this. I was able to get in contact with Craig Lieberman and later on Darryl Alison (owner of Kaizo Industries). Darryl was able to help me verify that my car was in fact one of theirs and is helping me find more info on mine !
    • There's restrictor pills in the stock boost control hoses. That's how they set the amount that was bled off and hence the "high" boost setting. The usual mod in the day was to remove it and send the "high" boost setting up to about 14 psi.
    • Thanks Duncan, that's the best info I've read. Furthermore after learning about the PCM programming side controlling the factory boost solenoid, the purpose of the solenoid is to "bleed" boost when pin 25 is earthed, thus allowing spring pressure in the wastegate actuator to overcome diaphragm boost pressure, thus closing or reducing the position of the wastegate flap creating more boost as the turbo is able to spin faster. It's pretty cool to see a designated Pill to do exactly this, would have liked to have seen it with a tiny filter over the end for those moments in vacuum.  The constant bleed pill has now been removed completely from the system and solenoid boost control has been restored once again.   Case closed 😂
    • The wideband reading is meaningless if it's not running. Why are you using shitty old sidefeeds on any engine, let alone a Neo? What manifold and fuel rail are you using to achieve that? Beyond that, can't help you with AEM stuff as I've never been their ECU/CAS combo.
×
×
  • Create New...