Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Marlin,

I thought your idea would involve a Dyno run and not an actual run at 300km/h

You would be able to get a good estimate on a cars ability to reach such a speed by using drag co efficient and some smart software. It may not be 100% but I would think close to 99%.

If it is a driving event I would still be interested.....I just need to work out how to bypass the 230km/h limiter the car has. The APS Phase 3 Falcon did 307km/h at avalon

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Marlin,

I thought your idea would involve a Dyno run and not an actual run at 300km/h

You would be able to get a good estimate on a cars ability to reach such a speed by using drag co efficient and some smart software.  It may not be 100% but I would think close to 99%.

If it is a driving event I would still be interested.....I just need to work out how to bypass the 230km/h limiter the car has. The APS Phase 3 Falcon did 307km/h at avalon

I didn't think there was too many Dynos that were capable of spinning to 300?

I thought around 200 was the limit for most. Anyway, sitting on a dyno is not quite as exciting as seeing a car bust through the air @ 300k's!

Is your car limited to 230 because of factory fitted tyres or tailshaft issues? I believe that most factory limits are for either if these. eg, V6 Magna/V6 Camry limited to 210 due to "H" Rated tyre.

My thoughts are this test would require all cars to be fitted with "Z" Rated tyres?

:D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • HFM BM57 has a "bad" knee point, IIRC. It's not the same thing as the later R chassis MC.
    • The ATTESSA is functionally identical to R34; there were a bunch of JDM models that continued ATTESSA including Fuga/Q70, Skyline/Q50, Cima etc as an option. All with Auto only and I think mostly for snow regions. AFAIK there were no AWD VR30DDTT sold in Australia - it is on my to do list to check regs for racing a LHD car in Targa/ATR/AASA/CAMS events because if I can get the auto to work it would be interesting to run a 4wd car The Ecuteck TCM tuning is the same model as their ECU tuning, they already have it for R35 and Dose's favourite, BMW. You buy "points" to allow your computer to be tuned, buy either a bluetooth (phone app) or bluetooth+USB+Key (phone and PC) dongle, and pay for a tune that will be locked to your tuner ( ). You can also access the tuning software yourself but 1. it is mega expensive and 2. these computers have a billion parameters that intersect, so how could you ever spend enough time on it to get a decent result.
    • Or, is it a case of what it is like owning an R series Skyline? NFI what the previous owner has done or fiddled with... Ha ha ha After reading through this thread, I went on a bit of a research about the Q50/Q60. Now I'm quite intrigued by them! Is the AWD in them more like a WRX where it's always AWD, or is it more like the ATTESSA in the GTRs? By the sound of this TCU tuning, this sounds like a case of someone has made some real software for it, and you just need the right piece of hardware, and then you license that specific vehicle/TCU. Or is this a case of the software will be really expensive so only a few tuners have it, and you still have to pay a license per vehicle?
    • By popular demand.. it was a coil. Got my hands on 1 new OEM coil, replaced with the one that made the less noise difference when I unplugged it while the car was running and started the car up. No stutter and the engine light was gone. I guess I’ll buy the other 5 they have lol
    • No, code 21 is very straightforward. It can only be the things described in that diagnostic flow. In fact it has no way of knowing that the spark plug resistance is out of spec.
×
×
  • Create New...