Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

I was looking to buy a cheap economic car for around the $4,000 mark and figured that Mazda 2s were out of my range until one seller had one for $3,900 which was clearly cheaper than the going market rate for the other Mazda 2 advertisements.The buyer mentioned that some dents on the body where the reason he was willing to sell the car cheaper than redbook values.

I went and looked at the Mazda 2 Neo 2003 today and it looked and drove great and it is the only Mazda 2 within my price point. I had remarkably low Ks of 99,000 and I found that similar Mazda 2 Neos of the same vintage where selling for $4,500 - $6,000. My mechanically minded brother in law came with me and he identified no significant mechanical issues. There was some panel damage, namely, the front bumper bar which may need some replacing because it doesn't click back into place on one side but is generally stable. There was some minor scuffs down the side and there was some rim damage probably from someone scraping the rims against the concrete gutter when parking. Apart from the minor body damage the car was solid, everything worked fine and there were logbook records. Mechanically, it was exceptional and I wasn't too concerned about the minor body damage because my main intention is to buy an economic car that will serve me for 3-4 years until eventually I will just ditch it for scrap metal.

Due to the bumper bar damage I bargained the seller down to $3,200 and he accepted. I thought this was a good buy until I did a REVS check on the car which showed that it had a repairable write-off in April 2008 following a collision in January 2008. I am getting the vehicle inspected tomorrow by my mechanic.

What I wanted to know was whether repairable write-offs should be avoided at all costs? Are their circumstances where it can be overlooked, such as mine where I am not too concerned about resale value and am paying a relatively small sum of $3,200.

I hear some people advise others that under no circumstances they should buy a repairable write-off vehicle because 'they will give them problems down the track'. What sort of problems are they referring too?

Thanks

Edited by Anthony8472
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/449143-repairable-write-off-mazda-2/
Share on other sites

Several states have made these illegal.

Besides rebirthed half cuts, they may be unsafe what with twisted chassis, rewelds, rust, but your mechanic should pick up these issues. Then again, some have been written off because they've been deemed to be unprofitable to repair.

Nevertheless, the next buyer may pick up what you've picked up and will he/she be reluctant to purchase it? Probably.

It's a shame you can't find the reason for the write off.

These days it doesn't take much to write off a car, especially something with a new purchase price as cheap as a Mazda 2.

Hail damage or a low level swim are both often causes for repairable write off.

Not necessarily a body bending crash.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Reading through the engine service manual their advice is do a cylinder balance test. Unplug one injector at a time and see if the idle drops a consistent RPM. You can also do this using a Consult cable which is easier. They also call for unplugging the power transistor, then with the engine off and the fuel rail unhooked from the manifold verifying that you have good fuel flow (even injection, no dripping/leaks, etc) when you twist the CAS by hand. Also verify the spark by pulling the spark plugs and allowing the plugs to ground and turning the CAS by hand. I would also start doing the sensor checks and idle valve checks in service manual. Make sure the MAF tests reasonably, the intake air regulator is sane, etc. You may have to get new spark plugs.
    • This sounds very old of me, however since buying the Tiguan shit box, my view on shit boxes have changed.
    • I've looked up the parts number (41011AL501). It's around $700 OEM. Usually our Infiniti G35 here in Canada have interchangeable parts with my Stagea but the parts number are not the same. I have looked around and it seems the JDM 2005 V35 Skyline (which is the same as our G35) has the same caliper but I cannot confirm. And I can't find a repair kit. The inner brake pads drags on the rotor, seems to be rusty piston. Thanks for the info by the way
    • This coupled with 6-9 speed autos with ridiculously short gearing is why these modern shitbox cars always seem so fast off the line. If it wasn't for those things, Raptors would not seem fast. The problem we have is there is a driveability gap between a more gentle take off and a wheelspinning sideways launch. The difference between ankle flex required to achieve one and ankle flex required to achieve the other is about 0.5°.
    • Yeah I think I'm also with the opposite here. It's 'hard to keep up with traffic' because in the real world I'm accelerating with 15% throttle and they are pinning it. It feels like I'm being an overt dickhead at anything above 15% throttle, so the car sounds like I'm being an overt dickhead to keep up with/get ahead of traffic when I'm really just trying to drive with traffic. There would be no issue 'keeping up with traffic' if we used the same level of throttle input/aggression to drive around. People really do just drive around with their foot nearly pinned in econoboxes.
×
×
  • Create New...