Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

you want some more!?!?!?!? well do ya!??!?! hehe... vids will be converted to digital format soon, then mpeg'ed to vcd. i wont be releasing them on my site for obvious reasons ;) tell me who wants a copy and i'll lob one to ya...

DR-Drift: a wounded car still keeping up with ya! :)

GTR UPDATE: looks like major upgrades will have to wait... only an intercooler hose came off... dunno how we missed it :eek1:

Originally posted by uLa32

GTR UPDATE: looks like major upgrades will have to wait... only an intercooler hose came off... dunno how we missed it :eek1:

haha.. oh well its all good then ula! good to hear it wasnt anything major mate

Guest INASNT
Originally posted by poyz

Man, everyone in this thread is sick...

I'm keeping away...

yeah sick in the head!! hahaha

POYZ i had a run with a GTi-R like yours last saturday on the way back from race pace after my tune and he was on my arse all the way down stud road. we came to a set of lights i took off slow in first, punched it in second and pulled away about 4-5 cars on him by bout 160km/h! :)

Maybe he wasn't trying :)

You did a 14-15 1/4 mile right? a GTi-R with typical "turbo" mods should be doing 13-14 easy :P

Originally posted by INASNT

yeah sick in the head!! hahaha

POYZ i had a run with a GTi-R like yours last saturday on the way back from race pace after my tune and he was on my arse all the way down stud road. we came to a set of lights i took off slow in first, punched it in second and pulled away about 4-5 cars on him by bout 160km/h! ;)

speaking of sick, one of my mates died yesterday arvo of meningacoccal... it feels very wierd, coz i'd never have guessed it'd hit one of us, n so fast as well.

Guest INASNT
Originally posted by poyz

Maybe he wasn't trying :)

You did a 14-15 1/4 mile right? a GTi-R with typical "turbo" mods should be doing 13-14 easy ;)

I was doin 14.5 but calder to a normal road is quite different, i can get way more grip on a normal, and calder was without the s-afc tuned! and he was tryin very hard or else he would not have tailed me again after it! He was a P plater and all they wanna do is race!

Me 1 Gti-R 0

he lives around my area so i shall race him again when i see him!

14.5 isn't slow, but it's not fast either...a reckon a similarly modded GTiR (to your car) will still be quicker down the 1/4 due to traction and power/weight.

Either way, there are plenty of GTi-R's running about nowadays, you might find me next to you one day. And trust me, I'll will try and race you.

I'll make it You 1 - GTi-R 20+

Cause I know you'll keep trying to beat me :)

Originally posted by INASNT

I was doin 14.5 but calder to a normal road is quite different, i can get way more grip on a normal, and calder was without the s-afc tuned! and he was tryin very hard or else he would not have tailed me again after it! He was a P plater and all they wanna do is race!

Me 1 Gti-R 0

he lives around my area so i shall race him again when i see him!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Input shaft bearing. They all do it. There is always rollover noise in Nissan boxes - particularly the big box. Don't worry about it unless it gets really growly.
    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
×
×
  • Create New...