Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Protection of the Environment Operations (Noise Control) Regulation 2000


Schedule 2 Testing procedures

(Clause 54)

Part 1 Motor cars, motor cycles, motor lorries and motor buses

Division 1 General

1 Definitions

In this Part:
diesel engine
means an internal combustion engine which operates on the compression-ignition principle.

engine speed at maximum power (ESMP)
means the speed at which the engine develops maximum power (r/min).

spark ignition
means positive ignition.

2 Measuring instruments

(1) A Type 1 sound level meter complying at least with AS 1259.1, concerning the characteristics of sound level meters, must be used. Measurements must be carried out using A-weighted frequency levels set at “fast”.

(2) The sound level meter must be calibrated against an acoustic calibrator immediately before and after each series of test runs. If the meter readings obtained from these calibrations differ by more than l dB(A) the test is to be considered invalid.

(3) The rotational speed of the engine is to be measured by an external tachometer whose accuracy is within 3% or, where an external tachometer cannot reasonably be used, the vehicle’s tachometer.

(4) In this clause,
AS 1259.1
means the document numbered “AS 1259.1—1990”, published in 1990 by Standards Australia entitled
Acoustics—Sound level meters—Non-integrating
, as in force on 1 September 2000.

3 Test site ambient requirements

(1) The measurements must be made in the open air where both the ambient and wind noise levels are at least 10 dB(A) below the noise level being measured. The site may take the form of an open space or beneath a canopy if no part of the canopy or its supports is within 3 m of the microphone being used for the measurement.

The test site within 3 m of the microphone must be substantially flat and may include kerbs, channels, gutter, poles or other objects that in the opinion of the authorised officer do not provide acoustic reflection sufficient to substantially affect the measurement. However, in no case is the microphone to be placed within 200 mm of any article or object.

(2) Any sound peak which appears to be unrelated to the characteristics of the vehicle is to be ignored in taking the measurements. If a windscreen is used, its influence on the sensitivity and the directional characteristics of the microphone must be taken into account.

(3) While testing is in progress no person other than the authorised officer must be within 1 m of the microphone in use. No person other than the authorised officer and an observer, the driver or owner of the vehicle or, in the case of a motorcycle, the rider is to be within 3 m of the microphone in use. No object (except as provided in subclause (1)) other than the vehicle, any trailer attached to the vehicle or any part of the vehicle being measured, the contents of the vehicle being measured or the objects necessary for the making of the measurements is to be within 3 m of the microphone in use.

(4) Before the measurements are begun, the authorised officer must ensure that the engine of the vehicle is sufficiently warm to allow the noise measurements to be carried out.

Division 2 Test method for motor cars

4 Microphone position

(1) The microphone must be directed towards the orifice of the exhaust outlet and must be supported by a tripod or similar device not providing excessive acoustic reflection. The general requirements for positioning microphones are shown in Figure 1 at the end of this Schedule.

(2) The nominal axis of maximum sensitivity of the microphone must be substantially parallel to the test site surface and must make an angle of 45 degrees ± 10 degrees with the principal direction of gas flow from the exhaust.

(3) In selecting the 45 degree alignment from the outlet of a motor vehicle fitted with two or more outlets, only the angle resulting in the microphone being farthest from any other outlet must be used.

(4) The height of the microphone above the test site surface must, in the opinion of the authorised officer, be substantially equal to that of the orifice of the exhaust outlet but must not be less than 200 mm above the test site surface.

(5) The distance of the microphone from the exhaust outlet orifice must not be less than 500 mm.

(6) For vehicles fitted with one exhaust outlet, the microphone must be placed so that the greatest possible distance is achieved between it and the vehicle within the configuration shown on Figure 1 at the end of this Schedule.

(7) For vehicles fitted with two or more exhaust outlets spaced less than 500 mm apart and connected to a single silencer, only one microphone position is to be used. That position must be selected in accordance with the procedure described in the preceding subclauses in respect of an exhaust outlet which results in the greatest possible distance from the vehicle.

(8) For vehicles fitted with two or more exhaust outlets connected to separate silencers or spaced more than 500 mm apart, each exhaust outlet must be treated separately as if it were the only one.

(9) Despite anything to the contrary in subclauses (1) to (8), if the microphone positioning procedures result in no suitable position due to an obstruction being part of the vehicle or in an obstruction being directly between the microphone and the exhaust outlet, the requirements of subclauses (2) and (3) may be varied.

(10) Despite subclauses (1) to (9), if the microphone is to be placed so that it is less than 500 mm from the engine then the angle between the direction of gas flow and the angle of the nominal maximum sensitivity of the microphone may be altered so that the microphone is more than 500 mm from the engine.

5 Vehicle operation and noise measurement

(1) The vehicle must be stationary with the transmission in “neutral” or, in the case of a vehicle with automatic transmission, with the gear selector in the “park” position if such a position is provided.

(2) The engine of the vehicle is to be operated in accordance with one of the following procedures:
(a) If the ESMP for that engine has been determined by the EPA—the engine is to be brought to and stabilised at a speed as close to 3/4 ESMP as the testing officer can achieve.

(B) If the ESMP for that engine has not been determined by the EPA—the engine is to be brought to and stabilised at a speed as close as the authorised officer can achieve to one of the following speeds:
(i) if the engine has 5 cylinders or less—4000 rpm,

(ii) if the engine has 6 cylinders—3200 rpm,

(iii) if the engine has 8 cylinders—3300 rpm,

(iv) if the engine has more than 8 cylinders—4300 rpm,

(v) if the engine is a rotary engine—4500 rpm.

© If, in the opinion of the authorised officer, the test speed determined by reference to paragraphs (a) and (B) is not attainable by the engine—the engine is to be brought to and stabilised at the maximum speed that the authorised officer believes that the engine can be safely tested.

(d) A single noise level measurement is then to be made.

(3) The specified procedure is to be repeated until such number of readings, each within a range of 1 dB(A), as the authorised officer considers appropriate have been made. For the purposes of this clause non-integer decibel readings are to be rounded downwards to the nearest whole decibel.

6 Interpretation of results

(1) If one microphone position is used, the noise level of the vehicle is the arithmetic mean of the readings specified in clause 5 (3).

(2) When the noise level of the vehicle has been calculated, non-integer results are to be rounded down to the nearest whole decibel.

(3) If more than one microphone position is used, the noise level at each microphone position is to be determined as if it were the only one. The noise level of the vehicle is the higher or highest noise level so calculated.

(4) If the microphone position is less than 1 m from the engine compartment of the vehicle, the calculated noise level is to be reduced by 2 dB(A).
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/44936-epa-noise-limit-testing-procedure/
Share on other sites

This is for NSW by the way.

The noise limit is 90 dB.

The on the spot fines are:

Up to 5 dB over - $150

5 to 15 dB over - $250

More than 15 dB over - $500

They can choose whether to give you this or take you to court.

At court the maximums are:

Up to 5 dB over - 50 penalty units at $110 each = $5,500

5 to 15 dB over - 75 penalty units at $110 each = $8,250

More than 15 dB over - 150 penalty units at $110 each = $16,500

Whoever knows FOR SURE at what rpm their car makes peak power in standard form please post here. Don't post stuff like I think maybe this or I heard that. Let's try to keep this thread clean and informative.

We should try to get peak power rpm for every relevant car; ie R32, R33, R34 GSTS's, GTT's, GTR's etc.

Something interesting. Note the use of the word MAY. "An authorised officer... MAY also affix..."

27 Defective vehicle labels

(1) An authorised officer who issues a defective vehicle notice for a motor vehicle may also affix a defective vehicle label to the inside or outside of the front windscreen of the motor vehicle or in a conspicuous position on some other part of the vehicle.

Excellent post Adam. I haven't seen a stock dyno graph lately but since they specify 3,300rpm or 3/4 of maximum power, 3,300 must be lower and therefore quieter. For 3,300 to be higher ESMP would have to be under 4,400rpm...no way is it that low.

http://www.gtr.co.uk/html/technical/index.asp

has stock specs for GTR's

This would explain why i've read people saying 'they only tested mine at 3200rpm' and people saying 'they tested mine at 6000rpm' if they know the max rpm, they would work it out to be 5500-6000, if they don' then they do it at 3200rpm?

GTR makes maximum power at 6800 rpm x 75% = Supposed to be tested at 5100 rpm.

GTS-T makes maximum power at 6400 rpm x 75% = Supposed to be tested at 4800 rpm.

It seems that if the tester do not have this info at hand, you are lucky and get tested at 3200 rpm.

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...