Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Currently have an ORC 559 Twin Plate Clutch Installed....but need some advice in terms of adjusting it.

The OEM Service Manual suggests a clutch pedal height of 190mm, but at the moment my pedal is quite a bit lower than this at approx. 160mm so that the 'engagement point' is lower.

My technique each time I push/release the clutch pedal needs to be very precise otherwise I get a jerky shift etc. I'm finding it quite difficult to shift from 2nd to 3rd, as I seem to be getting a thud/thump noise occurring.

Would the lower pedal height be causing too much preload on the release bearing? Or maybe causing engagement to be 'harsher'?

Any advice appreciated....thank you.

cant answer this directly to your issue although when i took my clutch pedal out to strengthen with more welds and flat bar i also did grind the alignment nut off and welded a new one on the opposite of where it was originally so that i could get more alignment out of the pedal effectively raising the pedal height 10-20mm of adjustment :)

The absolute pedal height will depend on the amount of movement in the clutch itself.

The most critical reason for adjustment at the pedal is to make sure that you have a non-zero and not too large amount of free play at the top of the pedal stroke. You want some freeplay so that the mater is not continuously loading the release bearing. You don't want too much because a large amount of free play at the top of the stroke feels bad and makes the clutch hard to use. You stab the clutch and it moves 10-20mm with no resistance then it hits the mechanical load and instantly becomes whatever force is required to push the pedal down. Sucky sucky.

tldr; just make sure that the amount of freeplay is right, and if you still suspect that there's something wrong, you might want to get an experienced mechanic to take a look, because there might be a problem hiding in the clutch itself or the slave or the fork, etc etc.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
    • In my head it does make sense to be a fuel problem since that is what I touched when cleaning the system. When I was testing with the fuel pressure gauge, the pressure was constantly 2.5 bar with the FPR vacuum removed. When stalling, the pressure was going up to 3.0 bar (which is how it should be on ignition).
×
×
  • Create New...