Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I remember reading somewhere that there were a couple variants of the HKS GT2530's as well as the KAI model. I'm assuming this means HKS updated them along the way, does anyone know if this is true and if so what are the difference and how could each be identified?

Any info would be greatly appreciated

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/451492-hks-gt2530-variants/
Share on other sites

all share the same CHRA/wheels except the kai.

Housings differed like mentioned.

RB26 housings also differed mainly on exh side, early had no splitter late had a splitter on the outlet that was flush to the outlet flange. Apart from that some minor gate differences

No real power difference if your using a 1-1.5'' wastegate separator in a bellmouth

They should all be using the same cartridge and wheels 446179-21 from memory . I seem to remember the KAI version having a port shrouded compressor housing so was likely a single turbo version . The main unique part today is the 60mm 63T compressor wheel and I think it was only ever used in 2530s and one other app I can't remember .

You can turn any GT2860 with the same turbine into a 2530 if you have the original undamaged compressor wheel and housing . Swap the wheel in balance and bingo new guts .

A .

I remember reading somewhere that there were a couple variants of the HKS GT2530's as well as the KAI model. I'm assuming this means HKS updated them along the way, does anyone know if this is true and if so what are the difference and how could each be identified?

Any info would be greatly appreciated

why do you ask? perhaps if we had a bit more info on the specifics of what ur trying to find out it would help...

why do you ask? perhaps if we had a bit more info on the specifics of what ur trying to find out it would help...

I'm gathering parts for a turbo upgrade. I'll be looking for roughly a safe 320rwkw but more power down the track so I'd like to get the right turbos from now, hence why I'm looking at the 2530's. I know -7's or even -9's would be better suited to that 300+ mark but any more power later on will be maxing them out. So I guess at the moment I'm just trying to educate myself on my options.

Just get the -9s.

Sell the -9s if you ever decide to go for 400rwkw and get 2530s in 2/3/4 years (or more) and enjoy the -9s for their application for now because realistically 2530s is motor out/rebuild time anyway. So changing turbos isn't a big expense.

  • Like 1

Might also depend on your demographic, i.e Sydney lots of 40/50klm zones and not much

in the way of over 80klm higher load gears, a few hundred rpm of boost threshold and

less off boost power can make driving around on bigger turbos tedious.

The opposite if you live in an area with lots of open roads or highways. I.e rural or

the US. You can get away with larger turbos since you are mostly above 80klms with

very little time spent in stop start traffic and low speed pot holed filled corners,

stupid 40klm school zones with not a single kid in sight. In this case you can go

for the -5 or 2530's and just not spend enough time off the boil to care.

End of the day, it still comes down to drivability first as the main consideration

on size, then peak power goals.

I will tell you my experience. I had a unopened motor with -5's and they were a little laggy (running 345kw atw) but on the open road they are great. In the city not to much (as above).

When I rebuilt the motor and did head work now pushing 400kw the -5's have come alive. Still running 2.6L and they are more than fun anywhere haha. I wouldn't waste money getting 2 different sets of turbos (selling one for a loss later) if you plan to rebuild. Go for a set you want to keep deal with the lag at first then benefit later when you rebuild. Less cost when you do rebuild.

Also as Jeremy Clarkson said - lag can be fun at the lights when people think they are winning then they wonder where you have gone.

Yeah I do see where you're coming from but would the -9s be that much better than the 2530s for my goal that you can justify doing it twice?

Absolutely. Turbos are the most important thing to choose. They decide everything in a set-up in a stock-ish scenario.
You are talking about $1,200 or so. So like I said if you plan on not rebuilding etc for 2 years or more - then change it out when the time comes.
I've had both -9, -5s and modified -9s... The -5s around town, hill runs, motorkhana etc as stated, are tedious on a 2.6l. -9s win for a car doing that type of work hands down.
-5s come into their own above 120km/h-150km/h+. You just gotta ask yourself how much time are you spending above that? And go from there.

Would HKS GT-SS's be an even better option?
Thanks for all the help guys

Much more research needed. The Garrett -9s and HKS GT-SS are the same turbo, just a different branding. HKS "kit" just comes with everything you need to bolt on, oh and a much higher price tag.

For my project the motor will be just one aspect in a sort of complete rebuild with suspension next and ultimately paint and interior so I think what ever set up I go for now will pretty much be it for a while (providing the motor doesn't give up). Having said that though I do miss the punch my 33 GTST used to give so maybe that little bit of lag given by the -5 will be enjoyable but I definitely don't want to have to go 120km+ whilst ringing it's nuts for the turbos to show what they've got. My best bet would be to experience most, if not all of my options first hand.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
    • You just need a wheel alignment after, so just set them to the same as current and drive to the shop. As there are 2 upper links it may also be worth adding adjustable upper front links at the same time; these reduce bump steer when you move the camber (note that setting those correctly takes a lot longer as you have to recheck the camber at each length of the toe arm, through a range of movement, so you could just ignore that unless the handling becomes unpredictable)
    • I got adjustable after market rear camber arm to replace the stock one's because got sick of having to buy new rear tyres every few months. Can anyone please let me know what the best adjustment length would be. I don't have the old ones anymore to get measurements. I'm guessing the stock measurement minus a few mm would do it. Please any help on replacing them would be fantastic I've watched the YouTube clips but no-one talks about how long to set the camber arm to.
    • Heh. I copied the link to the video direct, instead of the thread I mentioned. But the video is the main value content anyway. Otherwise, yes, in Europe, surely you'd be expected to buy local. Being whichever flavour of Michelin, Continental or Pirelli suits your usage model.
×
×
  • Create New...