Jump to content
SAU Community

Bosch Ev14. Aeroflow Rail. Freddy Ffp. I Could Butcher This


Recommended Posts

Hey. Got my parts. I can vision leaks thow.

post-133405-0-31656900-1418643195_thumb.jpg

They look nice

post-133405-0-86202900-1418643252_thumb.jpg

This green oring at injector nossle seems .5mm od too small but I could see it seating good when I bolt rail on putting pressure on it

post-133405-0-29047200-1418643555_thumb.jpg

The oring on the boss/adaptor seems to fat to fit into manifold, the adaptor fits snug. So Mabey a thinner oring will Winn this.

post-133405-0-43103400-1418643729_thumb.jpg

This blue oring fits squeaky tight into the rail, just how you would like it. Although, can u see the flange head looking bit on top of the injector? I can see that bottoming out on the injector rail cavity and not allowing the oring to be squashed under pressure. Although the plus side is injector would sit square to the rail. Is this right?

I was thinking Mabey grind the flange off or drill the hole In the rail bigger. Or Mabey that's the way it's spose to be?

post-133405-0-80744200-1418644076_thumb.jpg

post-133405-0-25358700-1418644128_thumb.jpg

put some lube on the O ring? I remember my boss was tight against the stock plenum but ok if i put some sillicon spray before trying to push it in

and no don't grind the top of the flange, mine's the same and I dont get any leaks

Remember there is no pressure really on the manifold o-ring so it doesnt need to be a super tight seal, the top o-ring holds the pressure so this is much more important to get sealed right. It should be reasonably tight in the rail.

My kit all seems normal. Adapters into the manifold are tightish and everything else feels good

The manifold adapters look ok. When the injector is pushed into the adapter it will seal down the bottom where the chamfer is

  • 1 year later...

Bit of a thread dig, but interested to see what people have found, or let people know of a potential issue......

So the manifold adpaters did fit fine in the standard manifold. However, my Greddy copy Manifold was a different story. the adapters are too large and won't fit inside the holes. My plan is to machine them down and use them, just interested to see if anyone else has found the same problem and how they got around it

BPP who supplied my fuel rail said its a known issue with the copy manifolds because they are never made exactly the same. So hopefully a bit of handy info for someone that will be in the same position

Shouldn't be too hard to machine down Callan, sorry I couldn't supply something that works.

I did know the Freddy manifolds are different, but they were larger from my experience, I just supplied a larger Oring for the adapter. Seems yours is smaller so as you say, quality control is shite on those Chinese plenums.

Not a problem mate, I appreciate your time anyway.

As long as Dad had a small enough bit to cut the o-ring grove a bit deeper, I'm not expecting any issues at all.

Its the first issue I've ever had with this manifold, I got it as part payment for some wheels I sold so at least I didn't pay for it[emoji14]

Have had one or two people say it is one of the better copies they have seen so can't be too bad

Ill let you know what size the holes are when I'm home on Friday/Saturday if your interested Scott? I was away so they just got a rough measurement by someone else the other day who didn't have verniers

They standard seals don't have to be forced in so I'm guessing there won't be much in it

Yep, I would appreciate it. These little changes can really cause problems with a top feed install. It should only be the larger part that needs .1mm removed, the Oring grove should be ok, you might just need a thinner Oring. Let me know if you have issues.

For those of you playing at home, measurements were as follows:

Manifold holes: 24.94mm

OD of injector adapters: 25.4mm

Must be made for a 25.5mm hole or so. I got the adapters machined down to 24.8mm and they worked a treat. Just had to try a different o-ring. Photo attatched:

20160213_164320_zps6xh2uiia.jpg

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
    • I haven’t yet cut the chassis, maybe I switch to a reverse flow. I’ve got the Intercooler mounted as I already had it but not cut yet. Might have to speak to an engineer 
    • Yes that’s another issue, I always have a front mount, plus will be turbo plus intake will big hasstle. I’ve been told if it looks stock they’re fine with it by a couple others who have done it ahahaha.    I know @Kinkstaah said the stock gtt airbox is limiting but I might just have to do that to avoid a defect so it atleast looks legit. Or an enclosed pod so it’s hidden away and feed air from the snorkel and below Intercooler holes like kinstaah mentioned. Hmm what to do 
×
×
  • Create New...