Jump to content
SAU Community

Bosch Ev14. Aeroflow Rail. Freddy Ffp. I Could Butcher This


Ruthr33
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hey. Got my parts. I can vision leaks thow.

post-133405-0-31656900-1418643195_thumb.jpg

They look nice

post-133405-0-86202900-1418643252_thumb.jpg

This green oring at injector nossle seems .5mm od too small but I could see it seating good when I bolt rail on putting pressure on it

post-133405-0-29047200-1418643555_thumb.jpg

The oring on the boss/adaptor seems to fat to fit into manifold, the adaptor fits snug. So Mabey a thinner oring will Winn this.

post-133405-0-43103400-1418643729_thumb.jpg

This blue oring fits squeaky tight into the rail, just how you would like it. Although, can u see the flange head looking bit on top of the injector? I can see that bottoming out on the injector rail cavity and not allowing the oring to be squashed under pressure. Although the plus side is injector would sit square to the rail. Is this right?

I was thinking Mabey grind the flange off or drill the hole In the rail bigger. Or Mabey that's the way it's spose to be?

post-133405-0-80744200-1418644076_thumb.jpg

post-133405-0-25358700-1418644128_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remember there is no pressure really on the manifold o-ring so it doesnt need to be a super tight seal, the top o-ring holds the pressure so this is much more important to get sealed right. It should be reasonably tight in the rail.

My kit all seems normal. Adapters into the manifold are tightish and everything else feels good

The manifold adapters look ok. When the injector is pushed into the adapter it will seal down the bottom where the chamfer is

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Bit of a thread dig, but interested to see what people have found, or let people know of a potential issue......

So the manifold adpaters did fit fine in the standard manifold. However, my Greddy copy Manifold was a different story. the adapters are too large and won't fit inside the holes. My plan is to machine them down and use them, just interested to see if anyone else has found the same problem and how they got around it

BPP who supplied my fuel rail said its a known issue with the copy manifolds because they are never made exactly the same. So hopefully a bit of handy info for someone that will be in the same position

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shouldn't be too hard to machine down Callan, sorry I couldn't supply something that works.

I did know the Freddy manifolds are different, but they were larger from my experience, I just supplied a larger Oring for the adapter. Seems yours is smaller so as you say, quality control is shite on those Chinese plenums.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not a problem mate, I appreciate your time anyway.

As long as Dad had a small enough bit to cut the o-ring grove a bit deeper, I'm not expecting any issues at all.

Its the first issue I've ever had with this manifold, I got it as part payment for some wheels I sold so at least I didn't pay for it[emoji14]

Have had one or two people say it is one of the better copies they have seen so can't be too bad

Ill let you know what size the holes are when I'm home on Friday/Saturday if your interested Scott? I was away so they just got a rough measurement by someone else the other day who didn't have verniers

They standard seals don't have to be forced in so I'm guessing there won't be much in it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, I would appreciate it. These little changes can really cause problems with a top feed install. It should only be the larger part that needs .1mm removed, the Oring grove should be ok, you might just need a thinner Oring. Let me know if you have issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For those of you playing at home, measurements were as follows:

Manifold holes: 24.94mm

OD of injector adapters: 25.4mm

Must be made for a 25.5mm hole or so. I got the adapters machined down to 24.8mm and they worked a treat. Just had to try a different o-ring. Photo attatched:

20160213_164320_zps6xh2uiia.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all, so I bought a very low kms 2019 Q60s in Nov 2022 and have been driving it stock for 17 months. The power from the VR30DETT has been a little scary as these cars did not come with a LSD. Although the ECU does well with compensating the lack of LSD by using automatic braking on different wheels when there is lost of traction etc, it does not really give me much confidence to push the car harder. Further to that, the car feels quite boaty especially around sharper corners or roundabouts - it would seem like the wheels are lifting on one side. These engines are also very prone to heat soak as the heat exchanger is tiny. I felt this during the heat wave in WA over summer even in normal driving. Gear shifting in the Q60 is also something that I hated - it's quite harsh at low speeds especially in traffic.  I recently purchased a set of f&r sway bars, rear diff brace and a heat exchanger from Z1 in US. Here are my thoughts 1) Rear diff brace - no more wheel hop when accelerating quickly. wheel spin still present but manageable comparing to before. Gear shifts are now smoother, you can still tell its shifting etc but you dont feel the harshness. I would highly recommend this mod, and it should still be on sale at Z1 at the moment. 2) Sway bar - there are 2 settings for this F - 114%/165% increase in stiffness over stock and R - 138%/214% increase in stiffness over stock. Currently I am on the stiffer settings. The car feels very planted. Due to the weather over here I have not been able to test if i need to reduce the stiffness. So far it's much more comfortable to drive over stock as you dont feel like your car is lifting up and in fast turns you can control the car a lot better while turning left and right in quick succession.  3) HX - the Z1 HX has a much higher capacity and surface area (up to 200% or something). Again with the cooler weather it's a little hard to tell. I went with the Z1 HX due to the price, size and colour (black). You can't see the HX through the front bumper. There is a cheaper brand but it was smaller and the rest were more expensive which i didnt think was worth the extra since I won't track this car much at all. All 3 mods were easy to install, all plug and play. Note of caution, the front bar needed to come off for the HX to be installed.  
    • A is the HICAS CU.  As far as I know, there are no other modules located at A in a car with HICAS, so it is fair to presume that F is the variable power steer module for non-HICAS cars. Same location, give or take. Makes sense - the wiring loom for the HICAS cars has the speed signal, power, solenoid drive, etc wires all present there - so why move the module and have to upend the wiring loom?   Having said the above though, it may be the case that F is further down in the rear guard - it's hard to tell. In which case it may be something else. Yes, it is the multi-pin plug next to the under dash fuse box. Top left corner. Can't miss it. Be very careful though - use insulated probes to poke around in there so  you don't accidentally short 12v to ground or an ECU input etc etc.
    • They didn't. This is their comments; I'm not sure why they don't have the OEM specs. 
    • Did the oil analysis include the acceptable range for Lead? Last one i has said 1ppm is the limit and the engine I was testing had 74, 80 and 33 (was the race car, tested from brand new run in engine). It may not help to tell you the engine didn't last long, but they never did back then 
×
×
  • Create New...