Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys ..

few weeks ago i asked for some help and got some good response from some ppl here. just wanted to show you guys my results..

so the set up is rather simple..

fuel :am using a aermotive stealth pump with some dw800cc injectors

ignition: stock

engine: arp head bolts , wiseco piston stock compression,extended sump and harden oil pump gears and stock everything else..

extra: am also using a aem water injection kit..actually just using filtered rain water to aid our crappy 91 ron fuel ...

management : haltech plug and play

tuned by me :)

15 psi :336trq & 414whp

21 psi :409trq & 499whp

from the dyno graph i thought this would been lagy ..but i was so wrong ....car pulls and spools just as good as my old precision 6262 bb .makes more power at same boost. at 11 psi with the old 6262 i was making around 340hp & with the 8375 11psi car made around 370hp both without water injection

honestly very impressed for a turbo i paid 580us for compared to the 6262 which cost 1200us..

and all of this was done with a single scroll 8375 and a ebay single scroll $140us manifold..... may be i got lucky with manifold but its just as strong as the one i paid 400us for before.have put countless abuse on it and no cracks yet.

dyno graph and vid

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VfhW7fvX-Bg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/452309-rb26-borgwarner-8375/
Share on other sites

No doubt they are an awesome turbo for the price, I would love to see a back to back against the precision. These things spool like a beast and there's plenty more in that turbo for you if you put the money in the right gear.

I've been running mine with the full race twin scroll manifold and made 560rw hp on ethenol with a 2.6. Made 500rwhp at 5500rpm

I've since upgraded the cams and valve train, cleaned up the head, raised compression, stroked to a 2.9 and ceramic coated the exhaust side .. Results should be up within the month

Old graph.. Rubbish photo but its 98 premium vs E85

Note the car made no more power past 50/50 ethenol/98

post-47556-0-70740500-1420352595_thumb.jpg

No doubt they are an awesome turbo for the price, I would love to see a back to back against the precision. These things spool like a beast and there's plenty more in that turbo for you if you put the money in the right gear.

I've been running mine with the full race twin scroll manifold and made 560rw hp on ethenol with a 2.6. Made 500rwhp at 5500rpm

I've since upgraded the cams and valve train, cleaned up the head, raised compression, stroked to a 2.9 and ceramic coated the exhaust side .. Results should be up within the month

Old graph.. Rubbish photo but its 98 premium vs E85

Note the car made no more power past 50/50 ethenol/98

yep they do spool super fast for journal bearing turbos..... i was really worried when i first compared it to a physical size of a 6262 .

as you can see in the vid the moto sits in a s15 silvia which is super light ...the weight difference of a r33 at 3400lbs and the s15 2700lbs makes this car feels like its almost at 650hp...

with some cams and cam gears i should be able to get power in a tad quicker and make a higher peak hp...

looking forward to seeing your updated build results...

yep... but the results with the 6262 would not be applicable to compare because it was done with out water injection ..so the timing when tuning was alot different .but the 6262 did make 415whp at 20 psi where as the 8375 made 499hp at the same boost... but the 6262 was only running on a .63 housing which would make high hp numbers on such a big moto difficult .

i had read some where a guy changed out his .82 ar 6262 for a .63 and the results were minimal difference on his rb26..but i cant confirm that........i know on a 2.0 honda moto moving from .63 to .82 makes no difference ..

only results i have with both turbo is at 11psi without water spraying either ways and the 8375 did make more power then....

Ok thanks mate, would be good to see some more results on this turbo going around.. This night spark a bit more interest

Here is my thread on my results if you are interested

http://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/414766-gtr-joeys-r32-gtr-e-flex-twinscroll-8375-results/

hey.. i used a .88ar back end because i was worried about lag as the turbo was non bb..

your dyno graph is a lil unfair comparison as the bigger ar back ends has 5psi difference .it may not look like much but once these turbo begin to spool the move from 7psi to 21psi in a heart beat... that may contribute to more power lower in the power band..

the twin scroll will help with spool up when combined with a twin manifold..

what moto are these graph from?

  • 9 months later...

Here is my graph on a 6262 by with .84 TS setup and 93 octane gas

611 at 19 psi

550 at 15 psi

I think if I had 9:1 Cr pistons my torque would've been a lot higher

I'm using JE 8:3:1 CR pistons and Tomei 264 cams.

EC990DBB-75E3-4453-89C1-EC9B0C5E4339_zps

Edited by silvianc

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...