Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

Can someone help me out with this,

Need some tips on the settings I should run on my r34 gtt for a wheel alignment, looking at setting the car up for drift.

As for suspension gear it is fairly stock aside from bc coilovers, adjustable castor rods, adjustable front and rear sway bars and tie rod ends. All the camber arms and bushes etc are stock aside from this.

Can anyone shed some advice on the set ups they have tried and tested?

Any help appreciated.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/452956-wheel-alignment-settings-for-drift/
Share on other sites

My 2c.

Run some toe out on the front to help the car turn in. Too much toe out on the front will make the car twitchy in a straight line however.

Start off with zero toe on the rear and add some toe in once you get comfortable.

Start with 7-8 degrees of positive castor. Circuit drivers will tell you to wind in as much as possible, but too much positive castor induces positive camber on the inside wheel at opposite lock.

Keep the ride height at a suitable level so the standard geometry can do its thing. Too low and you start messing the roll center, bump steer etc.

Start with the rear swaybar on hard and the front in soft and go from there.

I like to run the dampening on the softer side on the front and stiffer on the rear. Others will tell you otherwise. Start midway and see how the car feels.

So something like this.

Front toe: -6mm total (-3mm each side).

Castor: 7-8 degrees positive.

Rear toe: Zero.

Good luck.

Thank you for the advice really appreciate that, will try those settings.

I am raising the ride height as it is a bit too low especially in the front, want it to be able to turn without scrubbing. Interesting to run the front dampening softer than the rear have always heard people say front needs to be harder then rear, will try it though can always adjust on the day.

Yeah the dampening settings are more a personal preference, I like how the car feels and responds that way. You may find that it doesn't work for you, but every setup is different. As you said, adjusting the dampening is probably one of the easiest ways to change the balance and feel of the car, it's all about finding what works for you and your cars setup.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...