Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Heu guys , im abit confused with this crank trigger ecu and loom iv perched .(microtech lt8s)

what I dont understand is it appears that it doesnt run the cas in the dizzy and has a billet cap with a seal that fits into the distributor hole in the head , with a separate loom from the main loom straight from crank trigger to the ecu , it also came with another loom from cas in dizzy to ecu witch is marked (cas if crank trigger unused)

So I did abit of research and have only come across threads saying it needs to run the cas in the dizzy and no ones seen or no of anyone removing the distributor completely to run only a crank trigger set up so I finally made my way to u guys. ????? So any input would be great

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/457767-rb30-crank-trigger-no-cas/
Share on other sites

So batch injection would mean firing 2 injectors at a time right ?what r the pros and cons of this ?would there be any power loss or gain ?with having fuel built up waiting for the valves to open?

And as it was set up with the microtech x6 would this mean it still ren sequential ignition?

Or would this not work with no cas

So batch injection would mean firing 2 injectors at a time right ?what r the pros and cons of this ?would there be any power loss or gain ?with having fuel built up waiting for the valves to open?

Im running semi sequential injection on an RB25 and it seems to have mainly an effect on low load and low rpm AFRs, throttle response and also idle quality. I wish I had full sequential control, as such I would skip batch injection.

  • Like 1

So batch injection would mean firing 2 injectors at a time right ?what r the pros and cons of this ?would there be any power loss or gain ?with having fuel built up waiting for the valves to open?

And as it was set up with the microtech x6 would this mean it still ren sequential ignition?

Or would this not work with no cas

Just reading this again...semi sequential would mean firing groups of injectors. Mine are paired 1-5, 3-6, 2-4. Instead of pairing them like wasted spark where the cylinders are in the same position, the idea with injection is to inject fuel for 1 cylinder, then the next opening cylinder. (it works alright, but still a step down from fully sequential, for the reasons I listed above) As I understand, batch fire would be firing all injectors at a certain point.

Just reading this again...semi sequential would mean firing groups of injectors. Mine are paired 1-5, 3-6, 2-4. Instead of pairing them like wasted spark where the cylinders are in the same position, the idea with injection is to inject fuel for 1 cylinder, then the next opening cylinder. (it works alright, but still a step down from fully sequential, for the reasons I listed above) As I understand, batch fire would be firing all injectors at a certain point.

im following ya .1-5 3-6 2-4 as the firing order is 153624 so the next cylinder has fuel ready to be sucked in .r the down sides all that noticeable in street driving ? Or just on dyno figures?

I think iv read that na rb30s run semi sequential and rb30turbos run full sequential ?

Both I believe rely on a reference from a cas so id be right on asuming that nether of them could of been how my set up was configured

Im using my setup on my daily run around. There doesnt seem to be any problem once the engine is over 1200rpm, plus I get decent fuel economy too.

As for dyno figures, the difference between fully sequential and semi sequential is hardly a concern, as the engine is at such high RPM and rich AFRs anyways.

Having full sequential control over the injection timing can help to run closer to stoich AFRs at idle while still remaining smooth. Getting smooth cold starts can be tricky and it helps to have more control (although that will be ECU dependant).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My apologies. I forgot we were talking about weird beard M series stuff. Had been talking elsewhere with someone about an R33 with similar subject and got confused.
    • Nope, I don't like the look of ND RF, or any ND really, I don't like their faces or arses, why, because of their "modern" lines, the NC, whilst "modernish" has a more rounded shape that I like Well, that's how my overly judgemental eyes see it anyway  
    • Should be more than fine, especially the overall fuel pressure would never exceed 3.5bar (assuming that thing never gets more than 0.5bar of boost in stock form). According to the chart, it's 11amps.
    • I definitely know the first rule here, look first, ask second. I've seen many people get roasted 😂 I found a few diagrams for the RB, but I'm yet to come across one for the VQ. From what I have read, the pump gets the +12v along with the FPCM, and it's the negative wire that gets passed through the resistor to regulate the voltage. So I assume I can just ground the negative wire at the pump to eliminate the FPCM control. But I really wanted to see the VQ circuit diagram first to make sure I understood it correctly. Once the new pump is in I'll do some testing to see how it behaves, and in the meantime, I'll keep looking for a wiring diagram. Thanks for your help mate, your time is greatly appreciated.    
    • Maybe? I have the Supercheap ToolPro low thingo. It has a somewhat smaller diameter lifting "bowl" than you would expect on a workshop grade trolley jack, and a split rubber pad to suit that diameter. It clears the "N1" style skirts I have. Probably wouldn't if the jack's bowl and a suitably larger rubber block were in use. Having said that though.....you only need the rubber block to exist on the inner side of the pinchweld, so could carve away any rubber that fouled the skirt, leaving some there for "insurance" </simples>
×
×
  • Create New...