Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi again, I'm getting ready to have the cams I bought installed into the head (motors being built up as we speak) and I'm wanting some suggestions...

I bought a pair used from a member that were suppose to be 264 9.7 cams, but he sent me a 264 and a 256, 9.7, saying the other 264 was rust pitted.

So now I have a 264 and a 256. QUESTION: considering I'll be using my Electramotive TEC2 standalone, the CAS drive is not important to me, so which would you install where? (I forget which one has the CAS drive gear in it)

Like I said, I will not be installing the CAS mechanism, so either cam can go into either side... so which would be better where??

Thanks for the help

joel

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/45784-cam-question-rb26/
Share on other sites

Hi Joel, I would go with 256 inlet and 264 exhaust, I have seen this (longer duration exhaust) work on a number of GTR's. What's the lift on each cam? My RB31DET has 268 inlet and 272 exhaust, both at 10.5mm lift.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/45784-cam-question-rb26/#findComment-932662
Share on other sites

Hi Joel, I would go with 256 inlet and 264 exhaust, I have seen this (longer duration exhaust) work on a number of GTR's.  What's the lift on each cam?  My RB31DET has 268 inlet and 272 exhaust, both at 10.5mm lift.

Thank You Sydneykid for the responce. The cams are both only 9.7 on the lift. I had the head set up on a end mill (for the lobe clearnce needed), and the notchs came out sweet ....

I also have the Tomie adj cam wheels to go with the cam upgrade, so if you would, please give me some advice on where to start with the placement of the cams.

thanks again

joel

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/45784-cam-question-rb26/#findComment-932685
Share on other sites

Duration is the amount of the time the valves are open for.

Lift is how far the valves open. Consider it as the washer in your tap; as you turn the tap on further, the washer lifts higher to let more water through. With the higher lift cams, the valves travel further into the the combustion chamber, thus the modification to the head is required for clearences.

As with longer duration cams, higher lift cams have their advantage in the higher rpm and hurt low rpm response. However, how much this rule effect the forced induction engines always puzzled me. Ben is running a huge turbo with crazy cams and has amazing response, does 400cc make that much difference...?

Back to you SK.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/45784-cam-question-rb26/#findComment-933140
Share on other sites

Thank You Sydneykid for the responce. The cams are both only 9.7 on the lift. I had the head set up on a end mill (for the lobe clearnce needed), and the notchs came out sweet ....

I also have the Tomie adj cam wheels to go with the cam upgrade, so if you would, please give me some advice on where to start with the placement of the cams.

thanks again

joel

Hi Joel, 256 @ 9.7mm and 264 @ 9.7mm is a good combination, if tuned properly it will make power and run very nice with that combo.

As for cam timing all engines are different, I start at 1-2 degrees advanced on the inlet timing and 3-4 degrees retarded on the exhaust. The exhaust timing makes the most obvious difference to the power, but don't ignore the inlet. It helps the response as well.

Hope that helps :thumbsup:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/45784-cam-question-rb26/#findComment-933161
Share on other sites

SK,

Interesting that you've found that shorter duration inlet cam works better than the reverse!

Tomei sell two PONCAM setups for the RB26:

Type A - 260 degree, 9.15mm lift intake / 252 degree, 9.15mm lift exhaust

Type B - 260 degree, 9.15mm lift intake / 260 degree, 9.15mm lift exhaust

I went for the Type B set for my car, but was wondering what the theory behind running a larger duration exhaust cam was?

Wouldn't it be best to have a longer duration intake cam to fill the cylinder and push out the gasses out of the exhaust valves as opposed to having a longer duration exhaust cam and relying on scavenging vacuum to suck out the gasses?

Hmmmm...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/45784-cam-question-rb26/#findComment-933302
Share on other sites

SK, Interesting that you've found that shorter duration inlet cam works better than the reverse!

Tomei sell two PONCAM setups for the RB26:

Type A - 260 degree, 9.15mm lift intake / 252 degree, 9.15mm lift exhaust

Type B - 260 degree, 9.15mm lift intake / 260 degree, 9.15mm lift exhaust

I went for the Type B set for my car, but was wondering what the theory behind running a larger duration exhaust cam was?

Wouldn't it be best to have a longer duration intake cam to fill the cylinder and push out the gasses out of the exhaust valves as opposed to having a longer duration exhaust cam and relying on scavenging vacuum to suck out the gasses?

Hmmmm...

Hi Merli, I didn't really specifically choose the cams, they were available at the time at right price. I was really more interested in the higher lift (and lower price), than the small diff in duration. :cooldance

I have heard and read that longer duration inlet is better for the reasons you put. And they certainly sound valid. I have also heard and read that longer duration exhaust is better, based on the fact that the inlet is under direct boost and the exhaust isn't. So you have to run longer duration on the exhaust to match. I have also heard and read that a longer duration inlet cam makes the engine lumpy, so its not a matter of running a LONGER exhaust duration, but in fact running a SHORTER inlet duration. :confused:

There are plenty of arguments either way, I really have no idea which is correct as I haven't done or seen a proper comparison. I suspect that there may be a boost threshold where the longer inlet duration argument has substance. But I have no proof, it's just a suspicion. :headspin:

Most of the engines I am involved with, I suggest the same duration for both inlet and exhaust cams. Maybe that's the right answer. ;)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/45784-cam-question-rb26/#findComment-934655
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • An update regarding the registration with the DVLA I sent off the paperwork the day after I collected the car from the port, two weeks later it was all returned with a letter explaining they have rejected the application. This was because the cheque was £20 short for the road tax (I used a price list I found online). Nevermind it is what it is, it was sent back to them the following day with a new cheque. Fast forward another 2 weeks or so, I called them for an update to be told it had been rejected. Yesterday (16th September) I received the documents back along with another letter, this time it was because I didn't put an X in one box on the V750 (personalised number plate certificate), which declared that I had the rights to the personalised number plate. Why this wasn't mentioned in the first rejection letter, I don't know, but it could have saved this headache. The documents were sent back today, so fingers crossed third times a charm and it'll FINALLY be registered on the road just in time for the bad weather (woohoo!) To cheer myself up I lowered the front 25mm, was sick of seeing it sit like a monster truck. No idea how much clearance I'll have getting on and off the driveway, I'll worry about that when I can actually drive it
    • You're going to miss not worrying about rust in the strut towers like the Skyline shitboxes out there
    • A few little updates that weren't filmed due to not taking long to do or not interesting enough for their own video. My new K&N Air Filter arrived, I went with an RU-4180 which matched the dimensions of the universal cone filter the car originally had.  The battery had gone flat, while that was charging I tidied up the spaghetti wiring at the bulk head and down the sides of the engine Next job was to swap the stereo The Kenwood harness had the female ISO plugs cut off and the male ISO plugs cut off the adaptor loom and joined with bullet connectors. I ordered in a repair loom through work and re-did it all. New Kenwood unit installed (Android Auto, DAB, Bluetooth, Reverse Camera) The bonnet/hood gas struts have been poor since collecting the car. I couldn't find any suitable replacements locally so took a chance on a pair from AliExpress.  The originals don't use a retaining clip to secure the cup onto the ball fixture, would explain why I struggled for 10-15mins trying to pry off the cups. The ball fixtures unscrew using a 12mm spanner, new ones are the same size. Sadly no photo of them fitted, you're not missing much lol The dished Momo steering wheel got replaced with my Momo Tuner, turns out I ordered counter sunk bolts for the horn trim ring (like they normally are for the steering wheel) instead of allen cap (flat seat)  A terrible photo of a Quaife style gear shift knob I've had stashed in my tool box for many years after purchasing the incorrect thread size (I can see a pattern emerging with ordering incorrect parts...) Also threw in a cup holder and a (empty) Boss Coffee can, because why not  
    • GT-R clearly the better choice! The 300 is certainly not insaly fast but has a decent amount of poke. Does a nice little drift around the corners with a decent amount of throttle. It's VERY predictable in a slide too.  Feels so progressive! People probably presume there's a 25 year old driving it based on my behaviour this week! 🤣
    • Yeah Jap import. Fairlady Z then! I'm a bit the same.  They've been on my radar for a fair while but then just impulsively decided to buy one!  Was going to just buy an NA and add turbos to it later but decided to save the f'ing around and just buy the turbo version. 
×
×
  • Create New...