Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

First i would like to say that i have found over the years that tuners that i meet are a little reluctant to talk to teach what they know. I dont blame then as it seems a hard topic with lots of methods leading to a tuned car.

Ok so here goes. Can we agree for the simplest that the spark starts before top dead or does it start after top dead center (tdc)? about what degree do we see usually see full cylinder pressure after combustion?

Next when some say the term advance the timing whats happening. this is the part im a bit confused in my head. Is that giving it more time to burn so for exsample say the spark happens at 7 degrees atdc advancing it would strat the spark earlier to tdc mark giving it more time to burn. Or is that the other way around for exsample retarding the timing. Now if the spark is firing btdc bcause the fuel needs time to burn and reach maximum cylinder pressure by this time the piston has passed tdc and starts the power stroke. This i believe is how it works. So we are starting the fire a bit btdc and we ask to advance it, whats happening?? Does this term in this exsample (advance) starts the spark later to tdc giving it more time to burn and maximum cylinder pressure would be closer to the atdc area.

Sorry if this seems confusing. I can do my best to expalian what im trying to get across here. Just clearify a few things first.

Thanks guys. I have a strong feeling ill be ridicule for this post. I sat here thinking about it for 12 hours. Damn

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/458152-simple-timing-question-here/
Share on other sites

The spark is always before tdc as you said the flame needs time to burn.

When people refer to advancing the timing it means even more before tdc. So more time for flame to burn.

I can't recall where it was but there's some good info in the net relating to timing.

I understand you don't have access to a Dyno, so it's harder, but you should invest in some knick detection equipment, eg kmon or similar, because without it you are flirting with danger.

What you have written sounds correct for half of it, then you seem to confuse it all up.

Yes. Ignition occurs BTDC. Advancing the timing makes it move even more BTDC.

Yes, ignition BTDC is needed in order to give the fuel time to burn. If you do it at TDC or after TDC then it will still be burning as it comes out the exhaust port, which is wasted energy.

Some fuels are slow burning and need more timing advance.

Engines which are very efficient will burn the same fuel with less advance. More advance (for a given fuel) is an indication of a less efficient engine. "Efficient" in this case really being another word for "capable of cramming in more cylinder fill".

Thanks GTSboy. You were always good at clearing things up. Your gifted mate. I know i got a little confusing at the end thats way i was nervous about being ridiculed.

One time i had lots of fire out my exhaust and it seem like it was to close to the tdc mark after i gave it more time to burn. Move the spark time more btdc it made more power and stopped the fire out the tail pipe.

Can i ask? what you would contribute to having the exhaust pop on gear shift or just busting a flame at gear shifting. ????

The spark is always before tdc as you said the flame needs time to burn.

When people refer to advancing the timing it means even more before tdc. So more time for flame to burn.

I can't recall where it was but there's some good info in the net relating to timing.

I understand you don't have access to a Dyno, so it's harder, but you should invest in some knick detection equipment, eg kmon or similar, because without it you are flirting with danger.

Yes mate danger is so close i can feel it. Lol. Im actually thinking of buy a dyno for my shop. I just need to know that i would be able to use it maximize my results as dumb as that comment may sound. I have been trying to learn as the years go by. Simply by trial and error. Even with a dyno i would need these knock devices. So an early investment would be good. What would you recommend as a good knock detection tool.???

All the guys i race are in the same situation and i can say that they all run 2zj motor. Im actually building one now and can say im against a tuff challange the motors are strong and from what i see all the 2jz flaws are on the head. Yes our rbs only have the oil return only on one side but i see lots of other flaws in the jz heads. But there easily fixed. Back to the point here. These jz guys run aem ecu's and they all copy tunes from one guy to the other. It seems to me that they understand that an ecu is a buffer between the fuel injectors and load values including the volumetric efficiency (displacement) so what some guys do is just tell them what injectors to use and upload the tune by selling it to them . Then they do a road tune and clean it up a bit.looking at the knock levels. They make good money doing this. I dont understand why the same on this site cant be done using maths. Lol. I always liked that reply. But i feel using all.the same conditions. Like lets say a freshly built rb26 stock internals. On 98 ron. Giving an injector that suppied by the tuner. And afms or map sensors. Why cant tunes be sold. The rest can be easily fixed up. Im sorry if i went off topic here just thought i would mension it.

Edited by MJTru

Gear change pops and flames come from lots of fuel and retarded timing.

You can "sell/swap" tunes, but you do so with terrible risk because every engine responds differently, even when stock. What you can get away with on one you may not be able to on another. Factor in all the other random factors, like different fuel pumps, regulators, dumps, wastegate size/type/location, intercooler efficiency, etc etc, and there are just too many reasons for things to not work.

Because every car is different. Yes a similar car with the same turbo etc may have a map that you can use as a starting point but the point of a good tune is to tailor it to your own setup. A dyno is a great tool but not absolutely necessary, I have had a tuner do a great job with a wide band,knock detector, exhaust gas temp meter and an ecu with logging capability on a road tune. The dangers are two fold - you need someone to drive while you tune and you will find yourself going at illegal speeds on a public road. You won't know the KW you are making at the wheels but for yourself that is not so important - there are plenty of ways to measure performance - but if you are going to do it for paying customers they may want to see charts at some point.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This. As for your options - I suggest remote mounting the Nissan sensor further away on a length of steel tube. That tube to have a loop in it to handle vibration, etc etc. You will need to either put a tee and a bleed fitting near the sensor, or crack the fitting at the sensor to bleed it full of oil when you first set it up, otherwise you won't get the line filled. But this is a small problem. Just needs enough access to get it done.
    • The time is always correct. Only the date is wrong. It currently thinks it is January 19. Tomorrow it will say it is January 20. The date and time are ( should be ! ) retrieved from the GPS navigation system.
    • Buy yourself a set of easy outs. See if they will get a good bite in and unthread it.   Very very lucky the whole sender didn't let go while on the track and cost you a motor!
    • Well GTSBoy, prepare yourself further. I did a track day with 1/2 a day prep on Friday, inpromptu. The good news is that I got home, and didn't drive the car into a wall. Everything seemed mostly okay. The car was even a little faster than it was last time. I also got to get some good datalog data too. I also noticed a tiny bit of knock which was (luckily?) recorded. All I know is the knock sensors got recalibrated.... and are notorious for false knock. So I don't know if they are too sensitive, not sensitive enough... or some other third option. But I reduced timing anyway. It wasn't every pull through the session either. Think along the lines of -1 degree of timing for say, three instances while at the top of 4th in a 20 minute all-hot-lap session. Unfortunately at the end of session 2... I noticed a little oil. I borrowed some jack stands and a jack and took a look under there, but as is often the case, messing around with it kinda half cleaned it up, it was not conclusive where it was coming from. I decided to give it another go and see how it was. The amount of oil was maybe one/two small drops. I did another 20 minute session and car went well, and I was just starting to get into it and not be terrified of driving on track. I pulled over and checked in the pits and saw this: This is where I called it, packed up and went home as I live ~20 min from the track with a VERY VERY CLOSE EYE on Oil Pressure on the way home. The volume wasn't much but you never know. I checked it today when I had my own space/tools/time to find out what was going on, wanted to clean it up, run the car and see if any of the fittings from around the oil filter were causing it. I have like.. 5 fittings there, so I suspected one was (hopefully?) the culprit. It became immediately apparent as soon as I looked around more closely. 795d266d-a034-4b8c-89c9-d83860f5d00a.mp4       This is the R34 GTT oil sender connected via an adapter to an oil cooler block I have installed which runs AN lines to my cooler (and back). There's also an oil temp sensor on top.  Just after that video, I attempted to unthread the sensor to see if it's loose/worn and it disintegrated in my hand. So yes. I am glad I noticed that oil because it would appear that complete and utter catastrophic engine failure was about 1 second of engine runtime away. I did try to drill the fitting out, and only succeeded in drilling the middle hole much larger and now there's a... smooth hole in there with what looks like a damn sleeve still incredibly tight in there. Not really sure how to proceed from here. My options: 1) Find someone who can remove the stuck fitting, and use a steel adapter so it won't fatigue? (Female BSPT for the R34 sender to 1/8NPT male - HARD to find). IF it isn't possible to remove - Buy a new block ($320) and have someone tap a new 1/8NPT in the top of it ($????) and hope the steel adapter works better. 2) Buy a new block and give up on the OEM pressure sender for the dash entirely, and use the supplied 1/8 NPT for the oil temp sender. Having the oil pressure read 0 in the dash with the warning lamp will give me a lot of anxiety driving around. I do have the actual GM sensor/sender working, but it needs OBD2 as a gauge. If I'm datalogging I don't actually have a readout of what the gauge is currently displaying. 3) Other? Find a new location for the OEM sender? Though I don't know of anywhere that will work. I also don't know if a steel adapter is actually functionally smart here. It's clearly leveraged itself through vibration of the motor and snapped in half. This doesn't seem like a setup a smart person would replicate given the weight of the OEM sender. Still pretty happy being lucky for once and seeing this at the absolute last moment before bye bye motor in a big way, even if an adapter is apparently 6 weeks+ delivery and I have no way to free the current stuck/potentially destroyed threads in the current oil block.
×
×
  • Create New...