Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all

My car has been hesitating while accelerating, to the point where it will choke severely under load. It is also struggling to maintain idle, which fluctuates and will drop to about 500 and the engine will nearly stop running. Somebody suggested my tps may be the problem so I tested the tps with a multimeter. I've read that with the throttle closed, it should read about 0.4-0.5v, and at WOT it should read around 4.5v

At closed throttle I'm getting a reading of 0.36, and at WOT I'm getting 4.21. Just needing some interpretation, is this sufficiently low enough to assume the tps is the fault?

Some extra info that might be helpful: I noticed a few times last week after starting up it would idle unusually high (around 1800-2000rpm) on cold startups. Also while trying to accelerate the engine makes a whining sound before it chokes and goes nowhere. I've also noticed that for a while the idle would fluctuate a very tiny amount, barely noticeable unless you watch the needle very closely.

Edited by MBar93

Whats done to the car? Have you done the simple things like changed fuel filter, checked/replaced spark plugs, checked timing with timing light?

Start with the basics and go from there. You might find something along the way

In regards to the TPS. There are two parts to it. One is a switch and one is a potentiometer. The recommeded voltage for the potentiometer is 0.44-0.46V or so, This is easy enough to adjust. The switch should be closed at idle from memory and then open off idle, I'm pretty sure they are a 2 pin plug

Does it smell like its over-fueling or blow black smoke? You may have a boost leak as well

Whats done to the car? Have you done the simple things like changed fuel filter, checked/replaced spark plugs, checked timing with timing light?

Start with the basics and go from there. You might find something along the way

In regards to the TPS. There are two parts to it. One is a switch and one is a potentiometer. The recommeded voltage for the potentiometer is 0.44-0.46V or so, This is easy enough to adjust. The switch should be closed at idle from memory and then open off idle, I'm pretty sure they are a 2 pin plug

Does it smell like its over-fueling or blow black smoke? You may have a boost leak as well

It's definitely overfueling, it smells so rich, even more so than normal since it runs pretty rich normally. No smoke at all however

I've changed spark plugs fairly recently. I'll check the fuel filter shortly. Not quite sure how I would go about checking the timing

timing light, get a spare plug lead (or buy a cheap one from supercheap) then put the lead between the plug and coilpack number 1 (may need to stick a bolt or something in the coilpack to make contact with the coil and the lead) then put the timing light on the lead. Check timing, should be 15 +/- 1 degree at 650rpm. It says to disconnect the throttle position sensor in the manual I have, I'm pretty sure this locks the timing.

If the car is over fueling I would double check your plugs, they may be fouled anyway, check for boost leaks and clean the AFM (maybe even check for dry solder joints) The info is on here to do all this. go to google and search that way - "what you want to search for " site:www.sau.com.au

Possible air flow meter problem. if the car stars to miss, and turn off while idle, AFM is your best bet. I have a similar problem, and so far, every similar story i've read seems to be a dodgy air flow meter. I also got the error code for AFM while getting it tested. I'm still yet to fix it and find out if that was the problem though.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...