Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Just got off phone from NISSAN, 93-2/96 was a option on Turbo coupe.

Now we are talking Turbo and we are talking coupe.

2/96-end of production ABS is standard equip.

information taken from Nissan Japan spare parts computer

Now I have only seen turbo coupes 2/96 with ABS. never without.

I only go by official nissan information, and thats what I pass on to the people on this forum.

I do not listen to anybody at auctions or brokers in Japan, in fact I don't buy from them, I don't trust any of them

I think you could both be right.

I had a look on the http://imports.motortraders.net.au/ site (formerly japimportcar.com) and it lists two model variants for series 2 r33 gts25ts (manual, coupe). The first 1996-1997 has ABS as an option, and the second 1997-1998 has ABS as standard.

So it could be that only the late model series 2 have ABS standard and the earlier series 2 ones don't.

I guess I have to repeat what I said.

ALL MY INFORMATION IS FROM NISSAN

they are the people that build the cars we are talking about.

I don't think japimportcar.com would know more than NISSAN JAPAN. in fact I don't think anybody would no more than them!!!

If it doesn't have ABS and the build date is later than 2/96 then its NOT ORIGINAL. (FACT)

If you disagree then ring Nissan Japan.

Sure MR-GTR.. but the person who you spoke to at Nissan did not build the cars.. perhaps he just looked up the one model variant (later series 2) and gave you that info.

How do you suggest that there are so many series 2's without ABS? Are people removing it or what?

I hardly think 50% of them have gone out and done a series 2 conversion on their series 1 .. and changed the interior too? =)

I know all GTS-4 has ABS on them...

I should count my self lucky...

I thought ABS was factory option to all series II! .. I guess not:rolleyes:

anyway Just becareful on the road and hope you dont have to use ABS...

maybe ABS is good thing to have BUT it can be really annoying on the track...

cheers

Joe

ok people, the truth has come out, I've got the original skyline series II japanese catalogue right here in front of me and its says quite clearly (well its in japanese but you could work out) that the gts25t type M with active LSD (which is a seperate model by itself) and the gts-4 are the only ones with standard ABS. the rest which include the type M specII and the spec I and all the nonturbo versions have it as an option

I guess the guy at Nissan is a idiot, I was unlucky to get such an incompitant fool, I will get him to ring you for any information he needs. or maybe he can call your suppliers direct, it will make it so easy for Nissan japan to source such accurate information ,

I am sorry to have questioned your experience in Skylines.

Can your suppliers get me some of these genuine cars too, all these years Ive been relying on Nissan , I should have listened to all those aussie, kiwi, canadian, paki, indian,and shri lankin car brokers living in Japan, all hanging around the scrap yards and auctions, Over the past 9 years I've lost so many honest genuine deals. I should have just purchased over the net like most here,

I'm crushed , I won't sleep tonight.

Well I've been back to Nissan again, series 2 was released in Oct 95 officially, as from 2/96 all series 2 33 turbo skylines were fitted standard with ABS.

Prior to 2/96 it was a option on all 33 version cars.

like I said from my first input on this

from 2/96 all 33 skylines were fitted with ABS, the brochure was printed prior to 2/96. this is official from Nissan

Yes your correct I suppose, it was you instant who said 33 all had ABS standard, I agree with you as I personally have never seen a Turbo series 2 without ABS, I contacted Nissan to find out the truth from them , I guess some people don't want to find the truth.

But this I do know for sure !!!!! there are a lot of non genuine supposibly "genuine" cars out there, give me your chassis no and model number and I'll find the truth for you. IF YOUR NOT AFFRAID OF THE TRUTH. I can also find how many owners its had and where it was sold and where it lived in japan , also 80% of Skyline imports are purchased from the "accident repair section" of the auctions.

in the end I guess as long as your happy with it then thats what counts.

Originally posted by MR-GTR

Yes your correct I suppose, it was you instant who said 33 all had ABS standard, I agree with you as I personally have never seen a Turbo series 2 without ABS, I contacted Nissan to find out the truth  from them , I guess some people don't want to find the truth.  

But this I do know for sure !!!!! there are a lot of non genuine supposibly "genuine" cars out there, give me your chassis no and model number and I'll find the truth for you. IF YOUR NOT AFFRAID OF THE TRUTH. I can also find how many owners its had and where it was sold and where it lived in japan , also 80% of Skyline imports are purchased from the "accident repair section" of the auctions.  

in the end I guess  as long as your happy with it then thats what counts.

its INASNT mate not INSTANT!

I just stated that i THOUGHT they had ABS standard!

I am gonna check my chassis number so u can trace where it came from! it would b interesting to see if u r correct as i already know its origins

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...