Jump to content
SAU Community

What injector sleeves & o rings do I use for the PNT PERFORMANCE JUN STYLE PLENUM and standard injectors for Rb25det neo


Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

Have you measured the injector boss hole size? I'm not familiar with the Jun plenum but if it's made for the RB25 Neo it should be a standard 14/15mm seal. If it is made for a series one or series two RB25 they came out with a much larger sized seal for the side feed injectors. There are fuel rail kits from various brands (Race Works for eg) that come with adaptor collars to convert the manifold from side feed to top feed setup, just make sure you get one with the correct top seal size (can be 11m or 14mm normally)

 

  • Like 1
Have you measured the injector boss hole size? I'm not familiar with the Jun plenum but if it's made for the RB25 Neo it should be a standard 14/15mm seal. If it is made for a series one or series two RB25 they came out with a much larger sized seal for the side feed injectors. There are fuel rail kits from various brands (Race Works for eg) that come with adaptor collars to convert the manifold from side feed to top feed setup, just make sure you get one with the correct top seal size (can be 11m or 14mm normally)
 


Okay thanks

Okay so I just finished installing the plenum in my 34 it's running mint not missing a beat but it has the check engine, traction control off and slip error codes on the dash but it runs and drives fine do they just need to be cleared with the next tune ? Is it a tuner thing it is my car having issues ??

Ah.  It's an R34.  OK, so you have a traction control CU somewhere in the car that is not happy that you have removed the TCS throttle and TCS throttle position sensor.  I was thinking that the codes were coming from the ECU, but if you have a PFC then that will give no f**k.  But the TCS CU will.  You can't have TCS if you remove the throttle for it, so you might as well find the TCS CU and pull it out.

I suggested Nistune because when you transplant a Neo into an older car with the TCS CU and so on in the car, the ECU chucks a wobbly and puts the code up.  Nistune allows you to mask those codes.  But in your case, it's the other way around.

  • Like 1
Ah.  It's an R34.  OK, so you have a traction control CU somewhere in the car that is not happy that you have removed the TCS throttle and TCS throttle position sensor.  I was thinking that the codes were coming from the ECU, but if you have a PFC then that will give no f**k.  But the TCS CU will.  You can't have TCS if you remove the throttle for it, so you might as well find the TCS CU and pull it out.

I suggested Nistune because when you transplant a Neo into an older car with the TCS CU and so on in the car, the ECU chucks a wobbly and puts the code up.  Nistune allows you to mask those codes.  But in your case, it's the other way around.

 

 

Okay thanks for the help you wouldn't know where the tcs cu is in an r34 gtt? I'll have a google also

 

Nope.  Google will be your friend.  I've never cared where it is in cars other than mine and thankfully, mine never had one!


Okay no worries I've tried googling it but couldn't find anything
 Can't with a changed throttle body. 

 

Remove globes

Or.

Install original throttle body

Or.

Stare at always-on globe

 

Those are the options.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...