Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

who gives a crap about diet... i know i dont

im just going to walk the dog everyday like a madman

see what happens

will still be drinking and eating bad

will go for a run every now and again

so here goes

hopefully i wont get bored of walking and even might find my rugby boots and play again

FATZ

data weight comments

30/7/04 128kg of love... come and get me ladies (gut, man boobs, fat arse)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/47543-the-thinning-of-fatz/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 73
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

might find my rugby boots and play again

There are only 4 more games in the season...

31/7/2004 vs Beecroft (Away)

7/8/2004 bye

14/8/2004 vs Forest (Home)

21/8/2004 vs Iggies (Home)

28/8/2004 vs Collegues (Away)

Get your ass down there at the usual time.

Cheers

Mick

Boys, You're just not drinking enough.

Alcohol is a diaretic. So gets rid of excess fluid.

Beer is good. "Steak in a glass" as they say. And factor in all that exercise going to and from the bar/fridge.

Ever seen a fat alcoholic ?

Just stay away from Kebabs. It will only end in tears anyway (and probably vomiting and/or diahorrea).

I'm taking this on the road soon, but no evangelical consultancy fees to you guys in SAU.

Enjoy !!

El Bee

shit i was once buff at 115kg

now 127 im fat

so my target is 115

im 6'5 and pretty wide.

shoule be some fun and b man if you want to hit it im up to my 8th already... got to love friday baby

come over tomorrow for more cans i say!!!!

nath and i are going to take up squash maybe it will help

Pete

Damn you Fatz - I only started my first.

I'm with elbee111 - more beer

more beer, more beer, more beer, more beer, more beer, more beer,

more beer, more beer, more beer, more beer, more beer, more beer,

more beer, more beer, more beer, more beer, more beer, more beer,

more beer, more beer, more beer, more beer, more beer, more beer,

more beer, more beer, more beer, more beer, more beer, more beer,

more beer, more beer, more beer, more beer, more beer, more beer,

more beer, more beer, more beer, more beer, more beer, more beer,

more beer, more beer, more beer, more beer, more beer, more beer,

more beer, more beer, more beer, more beer, more beer, more beer,

more beer, more beer, more beer, more beer, more beer, more beer,

more beer, more beer, more beer, more beer, more beer, more beer,

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...