Jump to content
SAU Community

1st SA post :P


Recommended Posts

  • 3 weeks later...

I'm up for a cruise, be nice if the rain would stay away!

I've installed my catch can, braided lines & anodised fittings, & finally transfered over to SA rego' with personal plates ;)

Transfer was fun NOT! but the only thing they knocked me back for was the MOMO! WTF!?!? I didn't argue though, it could've been a lot worse :) A quick swap back to the stockie & I was done ;) Then the c/can was then fitted :lol:

Joel,

Did you get a FMIC before & after dyno?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/479-1st-sa-post-p/#findComment-20060
Share on other sites

No I didn't Matt Unfortunately.

I know before on 12.5psi it made 152rwkw with a std intake & filter 3" full exhaust & fuel pressure bleed kit.

When I had the after dyno a quick check a boost up to 14psi she made only 153.8rwkw.

The fuel ratio was around 11:1 and I saw black smokes coming out the exhaust on occasions.

There was however a heap more in the mid range, boost seemed to come on a little slower also.

For some reason it was really flattening out up top. ?

BUT...

I got home wasn't really that happy honestly so I started to fiddle removed the origional cold air intake and plumbed a ~5" duct to the origional intake in the box, I also removed the AFM mesh.

I know the removal of the mesh & cold air intake made boost come on 300rpm earlier. I did the test on Flagstaff Hill in fifth gear from 2000rpm with a flat foot before & after in the same spot.

Drivability has improved heaps and up top is heaps better now.

For example 60kays in second with no throttle, i flatten it with the 225'50 F1's with 28psi in the tyres and it starts to spin the rears then it begins gripping after a second or two.

First gear is horrid like basically it will lite up with just a little more than 1/4 throttle.

I've only done it a couple of times but with a couple of v8 commo's i've clicked in to second a little to quick and it can spin for like 4 seconds in a straight line.

it is quite fun to drive now but I need to take it easy.

I will do a dyno run before I fit the VG30BB Turbo and boost that to 1 bar..

Oh yer..

I will have to meet up with Bugalugs again and see how he goes with the 255's.. ;)

Hello 190rwkw I hope...

Hrmmm that sounds like i've been thrashing the car..

I havn't but.... well ermmmm maybe a couple of times but only to see what she can do. :)

I can't wait for the up top performance of the VG30 terbs..

I can see what ppls mean how the std turbo's run out of puff.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/479-1st-sa-post-p/#findComment-20075
Share on other sites

Sounds good mate ;)

@ the 215+rwkw mark I removed my AFM screens & it didn't do a damn thing! I was way out of the AFM voltage range by that stage anyway.

You'll really start to see the benefit of the FMIC once the VG30 is fitted @ tuned.

It'd well worth getting your ECU re-tuned by Tilbrooks straight after the VG30 is installed (~$500 I think?) You'll really unlock the extra grunt then! Unfortunately Tim doesn't do stock ECU re-tuning so Tilbrook is your man.

With decent grip you'd give 'Bugs a good look @ your tail lights ;) With the VG30 & a re-tune you'd probably give me a good look too! Unless we do a 3rd gear rolling run :uh-huh: :)

I need some 265 FM901's, with the Falkens I get w/spin all through 2nd.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/479-1st-sa-post-p/#findComment-20118
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...