Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

I've been reading the forums for years, thought I should sign up.. Turns out I already did in 2012 haha! but yeah this is my first post.

A bit about me..
I'm from Traralgon, VIC.  I'm an architectural draftsman, but prior to that I was a mechanic. I did 6 years for Penfold Holden, before leaving the industry in 2012.

Cars I've owned, in order..
- 1967 Ford Fairlane
- 2003 VY s-pac Manual
- 1986 VL berlina turbo A8 Auto
- EA Ford falcon - run around 
-1986 VL SL turbo A8 Auto
- TR Magna wagon - run around
- 1990 VN BT1 5.0L Auto
- 1990 VN EXEC 3.8L wagon - run around
- 1983 VH SL/E 4.2L Manual
- 2011 VE SS 6.0L Wagon Manual 330rwkw
- 1985 Ford F100 SWB 5.0L Auto
- 2009 FPV F6 Ute 4.0L Auto
- 2014 VW Amarok Canyon (current daily)
- 1995  R33 GTS-4 S1.5 Manual (current project).. see below.

So the GTS-4... 
When i first got with the Mrs back in 2011 I had the VH, the VE SS and an R6. The SS was daily, the bike was weekend, and the VH was a driveway ornament. cool af little car, but I never touched it.
f**k knows why, but I listened to the Mrs and sold he VH, for I think maybe $3k?? (we all make mistakes). Anyways, she said 'sell the VH and for your 30th I'll buy you any car you want'.. Nov 2019 I turned 30 and I hit her up.

I found an R33 GTS-4 with a seized motor and rough body real cheap. We got it shipped down to us from Northern NSW and the project begun. Extra points to the Mrs. she also bought me a 2 post hoist to work on the car.

100388488_278784153261337_1862877476921802752_n.jpg.aa0ad7d1f6fe7934a1c8fb234c9f2476.jpg

The intention is to build a street registered hill climb / time track car. I always wanted a GTR but these days that's a little unrealistic, especially for a track car. The GTS4 with a 26 is close enough for me.

99361471_596890664266368_5695320960291307520_n.jpg.64e03406b12f76da16f1dee58447ff50.jpg


I've removed the dead RB25DE, I bought a S3 R33 RB26 from a bloke in QLD. it was low on comp in Cyl 3. but complete. I stripped it down, and inspected the rings. I found the rings on Cyl 3 to have rotated into alignment. I reset the rings, reassembled the engine and comp tested it. 135psi (cold)(+/- 5psi) across all 6. Not going to push big numbers yet, the idea is to get it running and re-address later. but I'm happy with the health of the motor currently for such a task. 

100086710_806621556408320_6034257131929075712_n.png.b4e1e64803f5682827a0bab9bfa04a94.png

The 26 has been in and out of the car, working things out. Its about to go back in before the car goes off for wiring.

I recently gave the motor a freshen up with VHT wrinkle black intake and piping. and VHT wrinkle blue rockers, timing, coil covers


100688706_815196745670461_3995400907721277440_n.jpg.02071ddf81fcfac21e0edd20fe2eb55e.jpg


That's basically where I'm at. 

Cheers, Ross

  • Like 3
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/480470-new-guy-from-vic/
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Matty George said:

Nice story mate. Love how the mrs let you by a hoist to work on it.... she’s a keeper. Looks good and I’m sure with your history and knowledge you will build a beast. What you going to do the engine and what power you looking at?

Cheers mate, yeah shes a keeper. Even re-assembled the engine with me. Knows the four stroke cycle, what different smoke means from an exhaust (blue, white, black) and the three things an engine needs to run.. taught her bits and pieces over the years so she can show up some of my mates.

Not 100% decided on which turbo route I want to take yet. I'll resist a single turbo as best I can, while practical. Power figures aren't the aim, more response as its being built for hill climb. 

  • Like 1
  • 4 weeks later...
On 25/05/2020 at 4:15 PM, Marchetti said:

Cheers mate, yeah shes a keeper. Even re-assembled the engine with me. Knows the four stroke cycle, what different smoke means from an exhaust (blue, white, black) and the three things an engine needs to run.. taught her bits and pieces over the years so she can show up some of my mates.

Not 100% decided on which turbo route I want to take yet. I'll resist a single turbo as best I can, while practical. Power figures aren't the aim, more response as its being built for hill climb. 

From the little I know about the subject, I'd be inclined to stick with a TT setup, nice and snappy on the response and should keep a fat torque curve which, in theory, is ideal for hill climbing. 

On 5/25/2020 at 11:34 AM, Marchetti said:

The GTS4 with a 26 is close enough for me.

Sweet car and build so far.
 You'll find that if you drive your car even slightly hard, this will also perform at the same level as a GTR driven by some other owner. I consistently have guys up my chuff in GTSTs. When I ask how, they say... i dunno, i just threw it in and it stuck. 

Non GTR skyline owners are some of the maddest, most capable, most lose units out there and can show up a GTR cause they're not afraid to bin it... (no offence, not saying that's you). 

On 5/25/2020 at 4:15 PM, Marchetti said:

so she can show up some of my mates.

Tipping maybe some of this forum too(said the least mechanical person ever).

On 5/25/2020 at 4:15 PM, Marchetti said:

Not 100% decided on which turbo route I want to take yet.

This argument rages on to this day here... just ask away. Plenty of people with opinion's here! :)

Firstly, welcome.

Secondly, 

42 minutes ago, Steve85 said:

 

This argument rages on to this day here... just ask away. Plenty of people with opinion's here! :)

Single for power AND response.

Twins for stock appearance.

You can still get decent results with twins, but a comparable single is always better.

It's not opinion, it's fact.

On 6/20/2020 at 12:48 AM, luke gtr said:

Firstly, welcome.

Secondly, 

Single for power AND response.

Twins for stock appearance.

You can still get decent results with twins, but a comparable single is always better.

It's not opinion, it's fact.

Yeah I'm realistically going to move to a single that gives both response and power. Still a ways away from that yet. 

  • Like 1
On 21/06/2020 at 11:47 AM, Marchetti said:

Yeah I'm realistically going to move to a single that gives both response and power. Still a ways away from that yet. 

You will get there, give it time and just enjoy whatever you have at the moment.

  • Like 1
On 21/06/2020 at 12:54 PM, Steve85 said:

Ok ok, geez. ?You think this is the real world or something... Facts... they don't belong on the internet! ?

Lol.

Have seen the evidence.

But, there are still fanbois that don't listen to it.

I had and still have twins. Purely for the stock appearance. One day, will engineer and go single.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...