Jump to content
SAU Community

*Updated Date* Lockdown Release Cruise 29th Nov 2020 Belgrave - Gembrook

Steve85

By Steve85,
in Archived Events

 Share

Recommended Posts

Steve85 Mentor

Steve85

Posted
Posted

Join the SAU Victoria team for a social cruise through the Sherbrook Forest.
Initial meeting point will be Upway IGA carpark.
The cruise will head through Belgrave and on to Gembrook via the spectacular Sherbrook Forest.

Where: IGA Upwey, 62-64 Main St, Upwey VIC 3158
Map: https://goo.gl/maps/17R6emXMEuT71ACo7
When: 8:30am Sunday 29th November

Please keep in mind this is an SAU event. To participate you will need to be an existing SAU member or, sign up on the day for 24 hours for a gold coin donation. This is due to our CAMS affiliation.

I will also take this opportunity to remind everyone, this isn't a race, it's not a rally, it's a cruise, at or below the speed limit.
All details will be passed onto relevant authorities if requested.
 

 

  • Like 3
Steve85 Mentor

Steve85

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Hi all,

I have made a slight boo boo on this one. We (I) have misinterpreted the Covid-19 details and we are not able to run the event on the 22nd. We are now running it on the 29th of November instead. Apologies for the confusion.

Kinkstaah Grand Master

Kinkstaah

Posted
Posted

But um, the lockdown late was *last* weekend (the 14-15th!)

In any case, this road actually gets better/worth driving on from Gembrook through to Launching Place, then through the Reefton Spur or Mt Donna Buang.

C'mon, get amungst it!

  • Like 1
Steve85 Mentor

Steve85

Posted
  • Author
Posted
On 11/17/2020 at 4:05 PM, Kinkstaah said:

But um, the lockdown late was *last* weekend (the 14-15th!)

In any case, this road actually gets better/worth driving on from Gembrook through to Launching Place, then through the Reefton Spur or Mt Donna Buang.

C'mon, get amungst it!

Ok, so to explain; honestly, i have no idea what we can or cannot do in terms of the lockdown. It's been killing me, i feel like the rules are changing every day. So we are just doing this to be 100% sure we don't cop a giant fine. 
Regarding the actual route, you're right, it does get better further on, but I wanted to keep this one small/short as it's my first event that i'm running.
Providing this one goes right, there'll be much bigger, and longer social cruises coming up. :)

acsplit Veteran

acsplit

Posted
Posted

Thanks Steve,

 

Here are IMG_4358.HEIC some picsIMG_9593.HEIC

IMG_9601.JPG

IMG_9605.JPG

IMG_9603.JPG

IMG_9590.HEIC IMG_4361.HEIC IMG_9591.HEIC IMG_9592.HEIC IMG_9595.HEIC IMG_9586.HEIC IMG_9594.HEIC IMG_9600.HEIC IMG_9578.HEIC IMG_9599.HEIC IMG_9583.HEIC IMG_9588.HEIC IMG_9589.HEIC IMG_9576.HEIC IMG_9581.HEIC IMG_9587.HEIC IMG_9574.HEIC IMG_9579.HEIC IMG_9580.HEIC IMG_4362.HEIC IMG_4364.HEIC IMG_9582.HEIC IMG_9585.HEIC IMG_9575.HEIC IMG_4357.HEIC IMG_4363.HEIC IMG_4359.HEIC IMG_9598.HEIC IMG_9596.HEIC IMG_4365.HEIC

  • Like 1
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Duncan
      Replacing Fuel Pressure Regulator

      By Duncan · Posted

      I'm going to slap an old nismo logo sticker on my spare one and sell it to the land of the free for a thousand bucks
    • Duncan
      Replacing Fuel Pressure Regulator

      By Duncan · Posted

      lol, probably should have read further!
    • R32 TT
      33 GTR Broken front wheel knuckle

      By R32 TT · Posted

      Well - they have arrived.  And they are easy on the eye to put it mildly... These only have three bolts - but for a start there is a key that fits with vacuum like precision..  And as you can see by my ruler, the interface is large..   I listened to a podcast on HP Academy about Dan (KiwiCNC) and I'm more than comfortable he knows what he is doing. R35 Bearing assembly should arrive later today so can mock that up for a look. Can't wait to get these on and get some brake pressure logging too. IMG_3860.MP4
    • GTSBoy
      Nismo GT Pro LSD configurations

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      I would be very confident that they are the same parts (the 2 different SKUs). It seems very clear that you can drop the cam in the 2-way opening, or in the other opening. If you arrange it in the other opening in the same way that you see any other 1-way diff, ie, with the flat of the cam up against the 1° side of the opening, then it would work as a 1-way. It can only spread the ramps when driving forwards - cannot spread the ramps on overrun. It would then appear obvious that if you put the cam into the opening "backwards", that you would get the angled flats of the cam working onto the "points" of the 1° side of the opening, which would give you ramp spread in both loading directions. I do wonder if the forward direction of the 1.5-way config is equivalent to the forward direction of the 2-way, seeing as the cams are flipped and the angled surfaces on those would need to be the same on each side - AND - clearly when installed in either the 2-way or 1-1ay configuration they are not intended to work exactly the same (the ramp angles on the 2-way are 10° different between forward and backward, and the ramp doesn't exist in the 1-way config). 'twere me, I think I would rather actually have a set of rings that offered the 2-way with two different sets of ramp angles, say the 55/45 of the existing design and maybe a 45/37.5 combo for a less aggressive effect), AND another set of rings with a dedicated 1.5-way opening and a dedicated 1-way opening. The 1.5-way opening would actually have the steeper angle on the overdrive side that causes it to be less pushy than the forward drive angle, like you see in many other diffs. But really - if this Nismo thing is thought out properly and all those surfaces work on each other the way that they need to, who am I to argue?
    • GTSBoy
      Nismo GT Pro LSD configurations

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      I would be very confident that they are the same parts (the 2 different SKUs). It seems very clear that you can drop the cam in the 2-way opening, or in the other opening. If you arrange it in the other opening in the same way that you see any other 1-way diff, ie, with the flat of the cam up against the 1° side of the opening, then it would work as a 1-way. It can only spread the ramps when driving forwards - cannot spread the ramps on overrun. It would then appear obvious that if you put the cam into the opening "backwards", that you would get the angled flats of the cam working onto the "points" of the 1° side of the opening, which would give you ramp spread in both loading directions. I do wonder if the forward direction of the 1.5-way config is equivalent to the forward direction of the 2-way, seeing as the cams are flipped and the angled surfaces on those would need to be the same on each side - AND - clearly when installed in either the 2-way or 1-1ay configuration they are not intended to work exactly the same (the ramp angles on the 2-way are 10° different between forward and backward, and the ramp doesn't exist in the 1-way config). 'twere me, I think I would rather actually have a set of rings that offered the 2-way with two different sets of ramp angles, say the 55/45 of the existing design and maybe a 45/37.5 combo for a less aggressive effect), AND another set of rings with a dedicated 1.5-way opening and a dedicated 1-way opening. The 1.5-way opening would actually have the steeper angle on the overdrive side that causes it to be less pushy than the forward drive angle, like you see in many other diffs. But really - if this Nismo thing is thought out properly and all those surfaces work on each other the way that they need to, who am I to argue?
×
×
  • Create New...