Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

Just fitted a fully rebuilt R34 RB25 box behind my FJ20 and went for the first drive today but had an issue..

If I put my foot on the clutch fully and try to engage 1st, it doesn't seem to be disengaging the clutch fully as it starts to creep forward without being in gear.

Once I actually push it into gear, the clutch bite point is very high in the stroke which I thought would be the oppsite?

It also shuddered when clutching off from standstill.

Any ideas?

Facts are..

R34 Neo box - pull type clutch

FJ20 billet lightweight flywheel - fresh facing

Nismo slave cylinder

Master cylinder is original nissan bluebird

 

Does sound very strange. Your "fully rebuilt" gearbox could've been stuffed up on the rebuild and it's hanging onto the synchro baulk rings which means it's not fully deselecting the gear engagement. Could also be a selector problem. If either is case the problem is within the gearbox  Could also be just very tight synchro engagement and will go away once worn in.

One thing I would be doing for a start is getting rid of that Nismo big bore slave cylinder and going back to the standard one, as the smaller bore Nissan pull slave has more travel than the Nismo - been there, done that years ago.

The Nismo slave cylinders push or pull are pure shit because of their shorter stroke length and only cause problems.

Unless you can fix it with pedal adjustment, I believe the issue will be related to the release bearing not having enough movement to release properly. The only way to understand and fix that is box off and measure the movement. I've never had to do it but there will be DIY guides out there somewhere

  • Like 1
On 31/03/2022 at 6:16 AM, Duncan said:

Unless you can fix it with pedal adjustment, I believe the issue will be related to the release bearing not having enough movement to release properly.

That's right and Nismo slave reduces this movement for a start, so unless you can change the stroke via clutch pedal movement theres not a lot you can do. Being a pull clutch there's really no way to change it at the release bearing end or release fork hinge point - everything is at a fixed distance. You can't change bearing carrier lengths or pivot fork heights like you can in a push setup to correct problems like this. Have used a custom longer rod at pull slave cylinder once before, but again was to temporarily get around the incorrect clutch as you shouldn't have to do that.

On another note, being an FJ the clutch would surely have to be custom height too when using a pull setup, and not a Skyline based pull clutch (assuming, as no clutch type was stated) as I can't see it being the same.

I must have misread initially though as my comments regarding the gearbox were more aimed as interpreting the car creeping while in neutral using the clutch, as I don't think thats what was meant.

Hey all.. thanks for the replies.. yep. I'm guessing the clutch height is out of wack. I had the rb flywheel next to the fj flywheel and the FJ fly is thinner I'm pretty sure.

I should of picked this up but It makes sense now i think about how the pull type clutch works..

We lengthened the slave shaft today as a test and popped the centre ring off the clutch so the box has to come out anyway now.

I'm guessing this is something that can be machined and fixed? This is all a bit new to me with a pull clutch.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
    • ..this is the current state of that port. I appreciate the info help (and the link to the Earls thing @Duncan). Though going by that it seems like 1/4 then BSP'ing it and using a bush may work. I don't know where I'd be remote mounting the pressure sender... to... exactly. I assume the idea here is that any vibration is taken up by the semiflexible/flexible hose itself instead of it leveraging against the block directly. I want to believe a stronger, steel bush/adapter would work, but I don't know if that is engineeringly sound or just wishful thinking given the stupendous implications of a leak/failure in this spot. What are the real world risks of dissimilar metals here? It's a 6061 Aluminum block, and I'm talking brass or steel or SS adapters/things.
×
×
  • Create New...