Jump to content
SAU Community

RB25DET Neo bottom end 86.5mm bore


Recommended Posts

Nissan C34 Stagea/ R34 Skyline RB25DET Neo bottom end. Unfinished project. No longer have suitable car. Bore machined for 86.50mm oversize piston instead of standard 86mm. I bought the below parts off a guy a number of years back. Comes with:

  • RB25 Crankshaft
  • RB26 Crankshaft (was considering stroker)
  • RB25 Bottom cradle 6x Supertech
  • RB25 forged pistons (used but in great condition)
  • 6x sets of piston rings, oil rings and Gudgeon pins.
  • 12 conrods (should be 6x RB25 and 6x RB26)
  • Set of 'King' Conrod big end bearings EB4950B6000HK
  • Set of 'ACL' crank bearings 7M2394-STD.

Price $2,600 for all of the above.

If interested can send more pics of any parts. Hoping to sell together, but may consider parting out depending on offers. Parts are here for a complete RB25 bottom end with 86.5mm pistons. RB26 86.5mm pistons would be needed to make this a stroked RB25.

Location: Logan Reserve Qld.
Mobile: 0416 769 171

20141002_060743.jpg

20141003_190634.jpg

20141003_190709.jpg

20141003_192308.jpg

20141003_192327.jpg

20141003_192424.jpg

20141003_192444.jpg

IMG_20230304_155757213.jpg

IMG_20230304_155832036.jpg

IMG_20230304_155846833.jpg

IMG_20230304_155907257.jpg

IMG_20230304_155914516.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Slimline sub on the rear parcel shelf is doable. Pioneer TS-WX140DA is only 70mm high.   
    • People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
    • Easiest way to know is to break out the multimeter and measure it when cold, then measure all the resistances again once it gets hot enough to misfire. Both the original ignitor and the J Replace version. Factory service manual will have the spec for the terminal measurements.
    • Yes that sounds right. Cars currently in the shop for the engine work. Will need to remeasure .. but yes I think I must be targeting 45cm from fender. 
×
×
  • Create New...