Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Guys, guys... theres a whole "quality improvement" era happening in Japan now (has done for the last 4 - 5 years) and the european style cars being produced in Japan at the moment are what the Japanese think is "logical progression". European styling = quality. All Japanese car makers were somewhat caught up in over-spending and bad business decision making during the Bubble economy years, and what we're seeing now is the end result: cars that are build to world standards, that cost less (parts sharing across the entire range) and cheaper... unfortunately for us, that means that Japanese styling has immitated European styling to an extent, as a means of showing the *Japanese Public* (forget about overseas markets for a moment) that the cars being produced now are a step away from old, tired, bubble economy-type cars.

No, the 350Z, Skyline, Accord Euro, Mark II etc are very much styled along European lines to separate the "new era" of Japanese cars from the old. This way the Japanese car makers want the public in Japan see "immitation" as a form of respect for a superior product, while also... and this is the most important part... protecting their local industry!!! Why buy that C-Class Mercedes when you can buy a Toyota Brevis that looks almost exactly the same?

  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

kill kill..

I think euro design franky sucks.. especially like the new beamers, peugeots, fiats, vauxhalls, euro fords... :throwup:

pentae: looks like u have copped a hiding for throwing 350z in that bucket and rightly so :( What european car does the 350z look like??

So many people think, oh, skylines are the king. They drive alright, but not the best either. Anyone ever driven a 350z in stock form? let alone with new susp setup? it'd kill a skyline anyday in the bendies. And need i remind you, that it is also capable of putting out more power too with the extra 1L displacement. All in all, it's a better car. Much more modern, looks modern, drives modern.

:bs!: maybe your skyline is a badly setup piece of crap.. but you can't compare it to others out there. Every major comparison I have read says that the 350z is quite nice at handling, but doesn't set the world on fire. Despite the fact that most claim the performance is lacking with the aide of 3rd party turbo or supercharger solutions. If Nissan had built the 350z to be a turbo performance car rather than just look sporty, then things might be different.

pentae: looks like u have copped a hiding for throwing 350z in that bucket  

Its cool, only idiots who didnt actually understand the point flamed me :(

What european car does the 350z look like??

Why the Audi TT of course.

Rezz: Thanks for popping in and clarifying a few things :)

its the latest trend now that every new car that comes out is "euro styled" its the in thing in the car industry at the moment. i for one dislike how all the jap brands are adopting european looks, but hey there aint much we can do to stop it. You either love it or hate it. some of the cars that come out look pretty good though, such as the new liberty b4, i really like the look of that, the mazda 6, honda accord, the new holden vectra also looks ok in my opinion. then there are the cars that look fairly ugly, such as the rx8, mazda 3 and the v35. (in my opinion anyways)

i have to disagree with you 97r33gtst, the skyline does look sporty. although the r33 is not the most aggresive looking car, the r32 and r34 definitely look the goods in my opinion in terms of sportiness and aggressiveness. ive never driven a 350z, so i cant comment on how they drive (although most likely phenomenal) but thats not the subject of the thread. its wat everyones opinions are on the euro style trend. i actually dont mind the look of the 350z, but i can see why people dislike it.

In other words, im not a fan of the saturation that is euro styling, it should be kept to europe. every car these days is beginning to look the same, with a lot of new cars ive seen having very very similar curves and shapes. lets just hope that the trend dies off relatively soon :(

i know there "euro" (after all thats what there called) but i rekon the new honda accord euro and oddeseys look sweeeeeet.

just think black, slammed, 21" chrome deep dishers. VIP. maybe even rice.

but the "crazy" new styling of the 350 is just world progress. if we didnt get new modern styling, car look trends would never change. we would just get these dull sedans we had 5 years ago (but then they were moden and crazy!)

crazy stylings like on these euro cars are just helping world trend progress.

think about it.

My two cents worth:I've driven both types of Nissan(a Track Spec 350Z ,R33 GTR,R32 GTR and a few GTs-T's...and a SR20 Pulsar,if it matters!)and they're both damned nice.Depends on "what blows your skirt up".The final verdict for me?I'm the VERY happy owner of Nissans R32 GT-R V Spec....

The Good thing about japanese car makers going into a euro style may help the car brands such as BMW, Audi, Mercedes pull their finger out,

observe BMW roadster vs Nissan 350z Roadster:

Inline-6 V6

172.3 kw / 231 bhp @ 5900 rpm 208.8 kw / 280 bhp @ 6500 rpm

300 nm / 221.3 ft lbs @ 3500 rpm 352.51 nm / 260.0 ft lbs @ 4500 rpm

77.54 bhp per litre 80.05 bhp per litre

Point proven.

Of course they're going to copy European designs.

I mean what is Japanese styling?

Does such a thing even exist?

Most Japanese car makers have no real styling philosophy which is why so many japanese cars look like toasters or rip offs of European designs (usually because the designs on those more interesting japanese cars come from European or American design divisions anyway).

Could you imagine Mercedes or BMW copying Nissan or Toyota's styling!? Not gonna happen.

Yes, you're right ... The Supra _IS_ the toughest looking car ever made.

Oh wait noone said that. Well dammit, it needed saying.

Also I reckon the 350Z looks orright from the side, but that arse just makes me wanna poke it with a stick. A really large, long stick. Possibly a barge pole of some sort.

BMW is turning ugly too I reckon. The old M3/M5 looked about 925% (may be 1% margin of error due to rounding) better than the new ones. Mercedes has never made a good looking car. Neither has saab. Peugots only good looker is the rally 206 :) Very tough. Whee, I'm rambling. Why couldnt nissan follow the styling rules from 32 -> 33 -> 34 -> .... ? The 32 was nice. I think the 33 looks better. The 34 definately takes the cake though. Then the 350Z comes along and its a piece of arse. Shame nissan. Hmm I wonder what the next era of supra would look like? Will that be arse too?

its all personal taste.. it varies..

to me the Supra doesn't look like anything hot either with its oversized plastic bug lights so nur :)

the concepts of the "next supra" looked quite good though from what I saw somewhere.

The skyline atleast has its own shape. All the shapes of the 350Z and G35 Skyline all look the damn same. From the front even the damn maxima looks the same as a 350Z. Looks like nissan is just running out of ideas.

Supra used to look good, but there are so many of them around now and the design has started to date a lot, at the end of the day a 93 Supra is a good 12 years old already. It looks alrite from the back still, but the front with the big droppy early 90's style lights has aged, specailly when they get all dirty, which most of them are.

Does the skyline have it's own shape? I don't think it necessarily does, the skyline,and 200sx look kinda similar, r33, s14, before I new about them they were all much the same muchness to me looks wise, which is how I imagine they look to the general populace.

Something like the TT is a distinct design (even if it's a bit rolly polly) Next gen Audi TT sure should look meaner though:

Floridacarwiz_Audi.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • I am getting the same issue. Did you resolve it? I just got it after installing my new super coppermix and literally the same issue, new fork, new 18mm carrier, release bearing that came with the kit and replicated the exact same sound. 
    • If you like - I have the STL files so I can email em. There's a couple of gotchas (i.e the holes are not threaded so you might need/will need) to utilize some M3 melt-in threads for some of the points. However if you want to be super accurate, and are willing to remove your calipers and your SHOCKS it's a really good tool. You also might need to scale the part that measures the tyre width a bit wider. It defaults to a 7.5in tyre and I mean who is running that. Luckily with the magic of CAD this is very easy to rescale.
    • jeebus. glad you weren't under it while performing the stunt. Also thanks for the link to the wheel measurer, exactly what I needed
    • In the older stuff there were very significant differences 2wd to 4wd, for example Stagea had strut front end for 2wd and double wishbone for 4wd so it was not minor to swap. From poking around the 2wd v37, it *looks* like it might be more possible; some of the parts specifically have "2wd" stamped on them which suggests the platforms are more similar. You'd still want to start with a 4wd half cut to swap stuff from though. I'd suggest if you don't have a tune on the ECU you don't really need one on the trans either. Throttle mapping is in the ECU side (and you can always use a Roar Pedal if you want the throttle to actually respond to your foot), and really if you are happy with the stock power you probably accept the stock trans behaviour too....its all made to be "sporty" not racey.
    • So, updates. I have not washed the car since it came back from Tassie. I've driven it around a bit but not got around to actually sorting it out. I DID raise it because I cracked the rear bar leaving a hotel which was very distressing. Interestingly, the car drives more compliant now that it's raised a fair bit (5mm front, 15mm rear). Also noticed that my FR height was 10mm lower than FL. So that's now sorted out, too. I also bought this and had it printed: https://www.etsy.com/au/listing/1576422240/wheel-and-tire-fitment-tool-universal?ref=shop_home_feat_1&dd=1&logging_key=08f604d9fa4cc383550ba985e6ac85cd5cac7fbb%3A1576422240 Now, if I was smart I would have taken my brake calipers off to actually use this correctly but it was evident enough to me that in the region where the caliper was... there was nothing to hit suspension/guard/arm wise. So I'm going with "it'll be fine" after using the tool to hopefully very precisely measure the wheel clearance. Also while doing this, I had the very VERY bad idea of jacking one of the wheels/suspension arms up while the rest of the car was on jack stands. I did this to see how the arm would travel. This all was well and good until the car slid off the stands and went through a fence. So don't do that. Incredibly nobody was hurt and there was only minor damage to the rear bumper as the car didn't have far to slide, and had 3-4 wheels on it. The only damage turned out to be the fence itself which was easy to fix, and a little bit of damage to the fibreglass rear bumper trim. I had already planned to try a touch up paint kit to fix the time I drove into my garage door to see if it'd help in the interim before I get it fixed properly. I used the Dr Colorchip kit after looking online and seeing everyone talking about it. Yes it's made for chips and not huge broken missing pieces and I'll be 500% recommending it for stone chips after using it for stupid things like me. This took about ... 10 minutes and looking at the half assed photo the 30 second job I did on the bumper corner was almost perfect just by using the tiny little brush and painting it in. The sealact stuff to remove over-painting is really useful, so if/when I do it again I'll likely slather the touch up paint well over it and then clean it up with the cleaning solution. The wheels should arrive in a couple of weeks. I am still kinda confident after doing a stupid amount of measuring (and borrowing a set of 18x10.5+15) that they will not fit because I overlooked something, somehow and flew too close to the sun. ALSO R34 GTR guard liners do not fit on a GTT. I bought the undertray brake duct guides and had the wonderful problem of them not fitting my intake, my oil cooler and the liners themselves were even worse. Attempting to fit them won't work in general - You would have to cut them up as another poster mentioned as the bodywork is different on the GTT. At least I can try to resell them. So instead of cutting those up, I cut up my old already-cut-up GTT liners and extended them by using some PP plastic and drilling some 8mm holes for some nissan clips for the 'extra' bit. Because I was happy to cut them I was able to mount them pretty damn forward so I now have some semblance of guard liners, and the brake vents seal the bumper from the bottom. It sort-of-looks like this, to give some idea - If you look at the GTR and then the GTT this is when I realised that I needed to seriously measure as the inside of the rim area is entirely, entirely, entirely different and could not take any internet measurements for granted.   
×
×
  • Create New...