Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ive got a 95 GTR and when the car squats I feel the car kick out in the rear.  Its not tires getting loose but rather a toe issue.  The car might just need to be aligned but when jacking the car up and shaking the wheel there is a very slight perceptible movement.  I am going to replace the rear tie rods but trying to figure out what I need to replace. 

Do I need to do just the ball joints or should I also do the outer and inner tie rods?  

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/485731-r33-hicas-refresh/
Share on other sites

If it is the HICAS that is loose, then it will be the outer ball joints on the tie rods, not the tie rods themselves that need to be replaced.

If I was having to do that job, I would be doing the next logical step and binning the entire HICAS shitstorm, which banishes those stupid ball joints and all the rest of the stupid HICAS along with it.

 

Well crap, I figured Id get that answer and I had thought for the electronic HICAS people would keep it.  I have a Z32 that I have removed it completely from.  Ill need to give it some more thought but you guys have set me on the right track.

8 hours ago, Team7 said:

and I had thought for the electronic HICAS people would keep it

The hydraulic part of the R/Z32 era HICAS is not the bad part. It's the brains of the operation that is the problem. Just not clever enough to do what it is supposed to do without trying to throw you off the road when you're driving above 7/10ths. And of course, the additional unnecessary wear points in the rear end.

40 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

The hydraulic part of the R/Z32 era HICAS is not the bad part. It's the brains of the operation that is the problem. Just not clever enough to do what it is supposed to do without trying to throw you off the road when you're driving above 7/10ths. And of course, the additional unnecessary wear points in the rear end.

So from what I have been reading it seems like if you eliminate the HICAS through either a block plate or other means it causes the steering to become heavy, somewhere between no power steering.  Has this been resolved outside of swapping in a different steering rack?  

It's not true.

The HICAS CU is the module that controls the assistance of the front rack (as well as doing what it does with the rear steer). The solution when ripping out all the HICAS stuff? Just leave the HICAS CU in place. It will still do the speed sensitive front steer assistance.

At least....it does on R32. I can't promise it will on R33. But I can't see why they would change the system that much - the brains are basically the same - it's just the rack changed to electric actuation.

On the R32, because my HICAS was faulty (aftermarket steering wheel had no position sensor, so the HICAS CU would go into a spaz state at >80 km/h and activate the isolation solenoid to the rear rack, which was not working properly and caused the rear rack to steer which caused me to need to wind in a half a turn of lock to keep the car on the road, which is just f**king stupid), I simply pulled one of the connectors out of the back of the HICAS CU. I can't remember any more if it was the smaller or larger connector, but whichever it was - the power steering remained normal and the HICAS stopped panicking and there was no HICAS light on the dash (because the light is fed from the connector I pulled out!). You have to leave one of the connectors and not the other. On the R32 that is. On an R33, it might instead be necessary to pull a wire or two out of a connector instead. You'd need to look at the wiring diagram to see.

Then, after driving like that for years I just swapped out the whole HICAS subframe for one that was non-HICAS, along with the non-HICAS toe control arms (which gets rid of the the tie rods and ball joints in favour of normal bushes - which are now steel spherical joints on my car), and deleted the hydraulic equipment and replaced the PS pump with an R34 one (which was easy because it was attached to the Neo that I put in the engine bay). 25 years after the first HICAS fault, it is still otherwise normal.

Edited by GTSBoy

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...