Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all

I've purchased an 'RB25DET' through my mechanic and when it cam in he informed me it was a 'Series II RB25DET'

He said they would produce more more power then a Series I

I was just wandering how much more? And what differences does it have over a series I motor to make it better?

Thank you in advance.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/48820-series-ii-motor-vs-series-i/
Share on other sites

there is no difference between the series I and series II motors.

There are some differences outside the motors:

Different coil packs and ignitors

Different ECU from 95 onwards

Different Turbo in series 2, spools up more quickly.

Are you sure about ur mechanic?

Just the stock ECU is a little more intelligent.. it also has direct fire ignition coils rather than an ignitor pack. I don't think actually makes it any better though(??) just the coils are more expensive per piece. By the time you throw out the stock ECU and turbo it matters little.

Otherwise as far as I know, a s2 WILL NOT make any more power... as the basic engine block, pistons, cams, rod are exactly the same. The later s2 turbos are meant to be different exhaust wheel but again that doesn't make much difference in terms of power or anything like that.

Its an interesting one though. Maybe somebody out there can be more specific...

Also likely that a series1 RB25DET is more likely to be older and worn compared to a newer rb25det. Newer engines generally make better power just because of the km and age.

P.S. and SNAP with Duncan :)

lol pred

Well John knows his stuff so he must have been talking about one of those differences. Did you ask him about the specific thing which makes it better? I reckon the one thing that would make a real difference is the younger engine, prolly lower klm, so prolly better compression, so prolly more power...

There's some disagreement about whether the SII turbo is "better", its got a plastic wheel instead of steel and some people think that means it will last less time with extra boost.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
    • The downside of this is when you try to track the car, as soon as you hit ABS you get introduced to a unbled system. I want to avoid this. I do not want to bleed/flush/jack up the car twice just to bleed the f**kin car.
×
×
  • Create New...