Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

Alright here I go. I own a 1983 e30. The engine is on its way out, the cylinders were down on pressure and a couple of other little things. the car is currently off the road. I believe the car to be straight. There is no rust, the owner before me was an enthusiast so the car is in excellent condition.

Instead of getting a new car I thought I would try and fix the one I have. And make a machine out of it at the same time. It was suggested that I put a SR20 in it. I have been looking at getting a sr20 front cut. But i thought if i could why not try a RB20 or even better a RB25....

I have done a bit of research and have found (i hope) that its not that hard to do, (with the sr20 det anyway) gearbox lines up with the hole and everything, Nissan nose needs to be welded onto tail shaft, the main problem is that the exhaust is on the wrong side, which you cant do anything about. Now obviosly there would be more involved with the 6cyl conversion

Just wondering if anyone has done or seen done a similar engine swap, and any other problems ect. or a contact to someone who has, (brisbne area)

All suggestions/ help is greatly appreciated

Thanks

*i know nobody likes/ takes seriously, newbies.... but i am fully serious about this and genuinly need some advice/help

thanks again

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/49206-bmw-engine-conversion/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

cool, thanks heaps for that.

i have been told that the engine mounts are not that hard to fabricate.

but i wouldnt know for sure.

hmmmm didnt think about the rotor.... but i think i rather not do a rotory

though (nothing against them)

would there be any major benifits getting the rb25 over the sr20? when it

comes to mods etc

I personally don't like the idea of a 4cyl in the BMW, I am used to and prefer the sound of a nice tuned sounding 6cyl coming from them.... one of my mates has a 3-series with a 1JZGTE in it putting out 218kw @ wheels and that goes plenty well ;)

a mate of mine had an E30 323i JPS, with the 2.3L it would break CV joints sometimes when dropping the clutch at high RPM.

Then he put the 2.5 out of a 325is and he broke his CVs almost every week.

Also there was a black E30 with an SR20 in it ,on one of the Serious Performance vidoes and he had the same problem he actually broke one while taking off on the video.

So i would say while your modding everything upgrade your rear CV joints as well because its a pain in the ass grettin the car towed everytime you break a CV.

"DO IT ONCE AND DO IT RIGHT" best adivce ive ever been given

good luck with the conversion

my uncle and i might be doing the same to his old BMW 2002 ;)

I personally don't like the idea of a 4cyl in the BMW, I am used to and prefer the sound of a nice tuned sounding 6cyl coming from them.... one of my mates has a 3-series with a 1JZGTE in it putting out 218kw @ wheels and that goes plenty well :)

what about the E30 M3? they were 4 bangers ;)

oh yea and so were the 2002 tti 4cyl, single cam, turbo.

i see, thanks 2guup2, and yes when i do do the conversion i intend to do it properly! no shortcuts.

he he.. the old 2002, that would be a cool car to do a transplant in

bmw 4cyl arent that great with the exception of a few:

the s14 m3 (1986 to 1991) engine have roughly 200 bhp from factory (2 - 2.3L (i think) 4cyl) , there was another version(1990), with up to 240. they are an awesome 4cyl n/a engine i would put one of those in if i thought i could get one cheap and i knew i could get parts that were redilly avaliable... but yes the 6s are a lot better

lithium: do you know any major/ minor problems you friend had with his conversion?

I had an E30 323i with a 2.9L conversion. Blew two diffs, one gearbox, no CVs. Go figure.

Torque monster.

Build a 2.9 with an GT28 hanging off the side...

Block and head from E30 325i, E30 323i rods, custom overbore pistons (sorry can't remember the exact size), crank from E36 328i.

I love 2002tii... my old man and I restored one about 10 years ago :(

Here piccy :(

once we get this Mercedes 230SL out of the shop we are starting on the 2002

its been in the build for about 8 years my uncle has owned it for about 15.

Might do a full report and get pics of the build up on my site if things go to plan.

my mate has the 2.5L in an E30 -- soon to go turbo, motor has just been rebuilt due to huge Cam wear! goes alright with just the 2.5L bottom end - 2.3L head and Lotus forged pistons! wierd combo but when the turbo goes on should be quick! only thing with these cars is lack of room down the car for exhausts.. 3inch would scrape out big time!

only thing to watch that i know of with these things is the rubber mount from gear box to tail shaft!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...