Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

change the colours.. grey is bad.. but it was looking promising..

Looks like it will give some good structure and things to the trading process. Not sure about the auction idea but some people will be up for that I guess.

Hey Dude, is there a login button?

Nope. No button. However there is a small text hyperlink that now allows me to login to the classified. :P BTW the link did not do that before.

d00d - love the site, I couldn't survive without it :love: (and was a tad frustrated last night after trying to fit these f*n turbos again and finding out my o2 sensors were stuffed), so my abruptness was not intentional (and apologise if offence).

But many times do I need to be authenticated? From a useability perspective, why would anyone think they would need to login to the classifieds separately when they are already logged into SAU?

hey mate,

thats completely not supposed to happen - all sections will use the same cookie, so you *should* only have to log in once.. i will look into why you are having to log into the different sections seperately.

And dont worry about abruptness mate, tis cool.

Christian

I think a few people are having problems coming to terms with the fact that you need to login in again into the Classifieds section before they can make a post. It took me a while to work it out. A few things I've noticed:

- the layout of the advert needs some work. Once you start putting images in (at least under Safari for Mac OS X) everything starts to get squashed up.

- A feature lost from the main forums is the ability to format the text in the body (or in this case 'Description') of the advert, that was a very handy feature to highlight particular parts of the advert.

- Only 3 images can be uploaded rather than 10 or so for the previous for sale section.

- I much prefer the previous For Sale section as the interface is the same as for the rest of the forums, it's easy to use because most are already used to it, and it seems there's a fair amount of functionality lost, for little (what seems to me) gain.

- The placing of thumbnails is nice, but not too practical as the page scroll will be fairly long in comparison to what people had previously.

- The adverts in the classifieds don't seem to be picked up under the rest of the site search and visa versa.

Any chance we can go back to what we had? It worked well, and wasn't much (if anything) wrong with it. I'm not knocking the intention of it either, so don't get me wrong. The rest of the forums seems to be going ahead in leaps and bounds.

Cheers

Brendan

Man I dont know how to word this the best way,

But. I really hate the new section. the old style was MUCH more easyer to navigate and use.

I think the forums have got too many sections and with this addition it takes alot more time and effort to have a look in the classifieds section that i now choose to skip it on my daily browsing.

Sorry, But i just had to get it off my chest.

some people might like the new section, I however stongly dislike it :rofl:

Thanks anyway :D

Essential.

hmmm :P

I definately thought this would be better, its virtually no different to use than the forums and makes finding info about the product easier... its also picked up by the search engines too... (and it cost moulah!! :( )

Is there anything I can do to make it easier to use? what if i integrated it into the current forums so it lists down the page like them?

a few of the section will be removed soon (actually tonight) so it will be easier to navigate then.

Christian

Christian dont get me wrong, your doing an awsome job.

Maybe you should try intergrating it, i mean it just may work?

the worest that can happen if people not like it, which by the sounds of it the current setup isnt that much better.

Im unsure but are you able to reply to the posts in the classified, a i couldnt find a reply button?

Thanks,

Essential

hmmm :P  

 

I definately thought this would be better, its virtually no different to use than the forums and makes finding info about the product easier... its also picked up by the search engines too... (and it cost moulah!! :( )

 

Is there anything I can do to make it easier to use? what if i integrated it into the current forums so it lists down the page like them?

 

a few of the section will be removed soon (actually tonight) so it will be easier to navigate then.

 

Christian

Consistent look and feel is very important. If you could integrate all the posts into ONE column, then have a "type" field which could contain say WTB, Auction, Fixed Price, it would have the best of both worlds. The hyperlink then sends the user to the post - which means you have all the parts in one list.

The mouseover brief descriptions were great.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Atmospheric vent requires something that doesn't use a MAF for load. You would need a standalone ECU for that.
    • Hey all,   I’ve got an RB25 with a trigger kit that includes a crank wheel, and I’ve hit a wall trying to sort a timing belt tracking issue. The belt either rides right on the edge of the cam/crank pulleys or walks slightly forward once the engine starts. It tracks okay-ish for a moment, then creeps right to the edge—and honestly, it’s stressing me out.   I’ve spent hours removing and reinstalling the belt, double-checking everything:   Tensioner setup is good, checked multiple times Idler pulley and washers are all in the correct places Followed the RB25 timing procedure step-by-step     The only thing I changed was the rear crank washer—I swapped the OEM one for a Neato version, and it made things worse. The belt now sits even more forward than before. I’m beginning to think the crank trigger wheel itself (from the trigger kit) is the issue—poor design or slightly off dimensions.   What’s strange is that with the previous belt setup, it actually ran fine for a couple of years—around 4,000 to 5,000 miles, even with hard driving and high RPMs. But even then, the belt was always riding right on the edge, and I know that’s not ideal or safe long term.   At this point, I’m debating whether to:   Machine a few mm off the crank trigger wheel to bring it back in line, or Replace it entirely with a better-designed unit     Only thing is, I already have the Cherry Hall sensors, bracket, etc.—I just want to replace the wheel only, not the entire kit. Anyone know a brand or supplier that sells just the crank trigger wheel on its own?   Would really appreciate any feedback—especially from anyone who’s run into this exact issue and found a reliable fix.   Thanks in advance.
    • Hi...a little refresh. Is Nistune gonna be enough to run BoV? Or do i need some proper ECU? 
    • Yep that's pretty much what I want to see. Racecars that look and sound like the Group A but with newer tech underneath to make them faster and safer. I'm sure there's enough VK-to-VN commodore, E30 BMWs and Foxbody mustangs shells around to make up a decent number of cars with hopefully a couple of sierras, rx7 and R31s in there too. 
    • Contact Jessestreeter.com/Skevas Racing/JustJap for a new r34 rb gearbox or go a cd00# conversion. No point playing with unknown condition gearboxes.
×
×
  • Create New...