Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

You have increased all the air flow systems and have not (or the ECU has not ) increased fuel flow. Or maybe it has but you have other issues as well.

I would replace the fuel filter as the easy first step, then check the pump filter.

Then check your injector duty cycle and fuel pressure.(is it rising with boost?)

You did not say what power you were making but it's obviously starting to get well over stock where more fuel is needed to keep the A/F ratio correct.

yeah i have a remapped ecu chip which actually has better a/f ration than my previous one as my previous ecu chip was a mines one...i set my boost on 15psi, the guy didnt bother boosting it all the way and revving it all the way coz he said i could blow the engine coz it was alreayd too lean ... yeah the a/f ration was getting more lean as the boost was climbing... so yeah thats wat they guy said it could be my fuel pump or regulator as i have a fuel regulator and its adjusted already to 45psi....so yeah he siad it most probably is the fuel pump....if it is wat pump u reckon i can get ? i was told the bosch 044 is the way to go....

You answered 1 of my questions, dude its pretty hard to narrow down the problem with out the facts, but from what you have given me it could be a number of things. blocked injectors, fuel pump & too much boost - 15psi is too high for stock fuel system.

Try a bosch 044 pump if that doesnt fix your problem then you need bigger injectors or to get them flow tested.

sorry the a/f on idle was 20, when on, low revs it was on 14/15 then as it was boosting higer and revving higher so did the a/f ratio, it hit 16/17 and they guy dynoing my car stopped coz he said it was too dangerous to push it more...it only hit 180 hp when he stopped it...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So, if the headlights' cutoff behaviour (angles, heights, etc) are not as per 6.2.6.1.1 without automatic levelling, then you have to have to have automatic** levelling. Also, if the headlight does not have the required markings, then neither automatic nor manual adjusters are going to be acceptable. That's because the base headlight itself does not meet the minimum requirement (which is the marking). ** with the option of manual levelling, if the headlight otherwise meets the same requirements as for the automatic case AND can be set to the "base" alignment at the headlight itself. So that's an additional requirement for the manual case. So, provided that the marking is on the headlight and there is a local manual adjustment back to "base" on the headlight, then yes, you could argue that they are code compliant. But if you are missing any single one of these things, then they are not. And unlike certain other standards that I work with, there does not seem to be scope to prepare a "fitness for purpose" report. Well, I guess there actually is. You might engage an automotive engineer to write a report stating that the lights meet the performance requirements of the standard even if they are missing, for example, the markings.  
    • Vertical orientation   6.2.6.1.1. The initial downward inclination of the cut off of the dipped-beam to be set in the unladen vehicle state with one person in the driver's seat shall be specified within an accuracy of 0.1 per cent by the manufacturer and indicated in a clearly legible and indelible manner on each vehicle close to either headlamp or the manufacturer's plate by the symbol shown in Annex 7.   The value of this indicated downward inclination shall be defined in accordance with paragraph 6.2.6.1.2.   6.2.6.1.2. Depending on the mounting height in metres (h) of the lower edge of the apparent surface in the direction of the reference axis of the dipped beam headlamp, measured on the unladen vehicles, the vertical inclination of the cut off of the dipped- beam shall, under all the static conditions of Annex 5, remain between the following limits and the initial aiming shall have the following values:   h < 0.8   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   0.8 < h < 1.0   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   Or, at the discretion of the manufacturer,   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The application for the vehicle type approval shall, in this case, contain information as to which of the two alternatives is to be used.   h > 1.0   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The above limits and the initial aiming values are summarized in the diagram below.   For category N3G (off-road) vehicles where the headlamps exceed a height of 1,200 mm, the limits for the vertical inclination of the cut-off shall be between: -1.5 per cent and -3.5 per cent.   The initial aim shall be set between: -2 per cent and -2.5 per cent.
×
×
  • Create New...