Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

still have a miss in my r33 under load at 5000rpm at 10psi.

have changed the spark plugs.

had it on the dyno with a fuel pressure guage( pressure good flow low)

replaced the fuel pump(nippon denso high pressure 400hp pump)

im going to clean the coil contacts where they go onto the spark plugs and ill check the little springs in the end of the coils.

want to know if anyones heard of boost cuts being as low as 10psi?

or maybe a boost sensor on the motor thinking it is over boosting?

the knock sensor might be sensing pinging at this certain rev? (havent heard any pinging)

any ideas let me know.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/50073-same-problem/
Share on other sites

when u changed ur plugs did u set a correct gap? .8mm is the general consensus here. what plug heat range did u use?

also do you have aftermarket ecu? stock ecu will sense boost increase and kicks in boost cut, can be as low as 10psi especially on cold nights. pfc will definitely fix that, otherwise a cheaper safc can do the job well if tuned properly.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/50073-same-problem/#findComment-996382
Share on other sites

hm.. hard to tell. cutting boost wire may not bring u anywhere as the ecu will need afm input, otherwise it'll go to limp-home mode and stutters at 2000rpm (found out abt this when my one of my afm wire was accidentally snagged).

i think could be something else causing it to miss. hopefully not a serious issue. can be quite a bitch to track down. i had similar issue in my car for over a year when it turned out to be fuel pump dying. had it replaced and all is sweet.

oh i just remember, what boost controller u use to run 10psi? dun trust any simple cheap bleed valve, it may spike, especially on higher gear. ask ur tuner to check it on dyno. best boost controller are always the electronic ones.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/50073-same-problem/#findComment-996443
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...