Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have ran into a runing hot problem on my 240sx with an RB25 swap.

It used to run around 80-85C on my PFC while driving around and would climb when I came to a stop since I don't have a larger enough fan.

2 weeks ago I mounted my FMIC in my car and now the temp will stay in the mid to high 90's (94-99) while moving on the highway. The only way to keep the temp in the low 90's is to keep my heat on full blast. I was then talking to a friend about running the car that hot and he didn't think it was a problem unless it started going over 104+C. I know some cars don't turn there cooling fans untill 220-230F.

So what does your car run at?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/50087-normal-operation-temp-on-rb25det/
Share on other sites

Anything over 90 degrees is costing power, 85 is the best running temp to target. I suggest a larger radiator is a worthwhile investment. This is standard stuff for an RB in an S chassis, there is simply not enough airflow (particularly outwards).

Yeh the std radiator is crap, ive got a custom alloy radiator with twin 12" Davies Craig thermo's... round town its between 74-84 degree's, on the highway it was getting as low as 69 which i may have to make some changes to. having trouble with the switching on the microtech.

I don't know if a larger radiator will help me since my problem seems to be a lack of airflow to my radiator. Before the FMIC was put in front the car would run a sable 78-83 highway and 85-95 light to light. Now the temp will not go below 91 once on the highway and that is with the heat on. It is summer now but starting to cool off. To get more airflow I was thinking of putting some vents in the front nose of my car. I am running 90% water/10% coolent with some water wetter.

where is water temp measured from? is it that drain plug thing in the bottom of the radiator (mine has the wires chopped off) or is it measured from the thermostat in the housign where the coolant comes from engine back to radiator?

ive just put a replacement triple core radiator in my rb25 sil, still need to mount a thermo fan. temps used to be up to nearly the 3rd notch on the temp gauge. last radiator (r32) developed a leak hence the replacement.

SK, is it bad if the water temp is too low? say 70 for example.

Not bad as in damage, but bad is costs power. Around 85 degrees has been proven to be the best for both. This is water temp of course and from only one sampling point on the engine. Oil temperature, exhaust valve temp, turbo temp (exhauts gas) etc are all important. But the rule of thumb is 85 degrees for the running water temp.

Hope that helps :P

I don't know if a larger radiator will help me since my problem seems to be a lack of airflow to my radiator.

if the amount of air you currently get thru your stock radiator removes a certain amount of heat from the coolant, a larger radiator will remove more heat with the same air, as its more efficient (due to larger surface area)

The straw that broke the camels back. :)

The clutch fan could be on its way out. the fmic reducing airflow could have been the last straw.

I run a bar and plate 100mm thick fmic, I used to have overheating problems with constant over 90degree temps so I slapped a pair of 12" thermo's on without a shroud (big mistake).

Temps came down below 90degree's but the overheating problem showed its ugly head on 35+degree days with the A/C and began spitting water out the overflow (water boiling 110degree's).

Out came the thermo's and in goes a new clutch fan and shroud.

The amount of air the std clutch fan now moves when engaged shits all over the 2 x 12" thermo's and a 16" thermo I've seen.

Temps are now perfect and never get over 90degree's.

So.. Check the clutch fan. Make sure you can hear it loudly for around 10secs first thing in the morning when you start the car. If not its shat its self.

You could also try some vents in the bonnet to reduce the air pressure inside the engine bay.

Have a look at www.autospeed.com for a recent series of articles on sighting air vents and undertrays.

That might help but the problem with RB's in sylvias and 180's is common. A larger radiator is a good choice as it adds thermal mass to absorb heat spikes when the car is stationary. I recall the RB25 radiator does not fit with an RB20 as it may have been too tall.

thats right, i recently bought an r33 radiator on the assumption that it would fit, but its about 2 inches too tall.

the only problem with a thicker radiator is it means even less room for thermo fans....if u want to keep the air con that is

I had similar temperature problems with a Bluebird 910 running an FJ20ET . No aftermarket multi core copper/brass radiator worked nor did cooler thermostats . It also had a large Plasma Man intercooler completly shrouding it . The ultimate fix was a Koyo replacment R32 GTR radiator , the core was about 20mm thick and was a single row matrix . The fans I used were DR30 twin electric in their native steel shroud . Problem solved . I cannot sing enough praise for alloy core radiators , they weigh about a quarter of what the old dinosaurs do and are way ahead in heat transfer capacity . It was explained to me that with alloy cores the surface area of the fins is greater while air flow through them is less restrictive .

With the Bluebird it was not possible to use an engine driven fan because the FJ20 is so long (Thick walled 89mm bore block with two twin row staggered chains and the water pump ahead of all this) . The way I see it the cooling system needs to have lots of capacity preferably force fed by an engine driven fan with the temperature regulated by the thermostat . I've seen plenty of people remove the "clutch fan" to fit electric ones to save horse power . They create cooling problems and save about three foot grams of torque .

More specific to the RB20/S13 JMS also found cooling issues with their S13 . The fix was to refit a standard style air dam and make a vent in the bonnet to let some of the post radiator air out . They changed from I think an S13 SR20DET rad to one of the Skyline ones . As SK said its getting the post rad air to exit the engine bay that will be the greatest challenge . If all else fails an oil cooler could help if it gets decent air flow and does not vent into the engine bay .

Chow A .

Due to the lack of engine bay space my thermo's are mounted in front of the radiator? i question the wiring as to the direction of flow but i could be wrong. keeps it cool and thats all that matters.

FMIC might be what the doctor ordered in relation to the over cooling problem.

Not bad as in damage, but bad is costs power.  Around 85 degrees has been proven to be the best for both.  This is water temp of course and from only one sampling point on the engine.  Oil temperature, exhaust valve temp, turbo temp (exhauts gas) etc are all important.  But the rule of thumb is 85 degrees for the running water temp.

Hope that helps :D

Thanks.

Has helped alot. :(

Another question.

Which would be more accurate spot to measure the water temp?

The factory location or the usual aftermarket location of the top radiator hose?

Ed

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
    • Yes they do. For some maybe. But for those used the most by abusers, ie Skylines, the numbers are known. The stock eyebrow height for R32/3 Skylines is about 365/375mm or thereabouts. The minimum such heights are recorded in adjacent columns in the database.
×
×
  • Create New...