Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So thats for the Z32 AFM  and HKS pod?

yeah, cause the pod is 4inches in diameter it isnt a straight fit on to the afm. so the adapter joins them.

people who have looked inside a hks pod (mushroom style) will have noticed that there is a bell mouth with a taper. well, the adpater piece continues the taper. therefore there is a consistent taper from the mouth of the pod down to the afm.

oh and the price is still 350. afm alone is worth that.

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

im still here 1000 all in

K

Thanks for your interest but a powerfc for an rb20 is simply worth more than that. i think your just used to prices for other cars. but the fact is that these are hard to find, hence the higher value. i waited SIX MONTHS for this unit to be sourced for me. You MIGHT be able to source one for a few hundred less than my price, but this is here in the country right now.

BTW youve gone from 1100 down to 1000, whats with that?

.

noted. but at the moment i would still prefer to sell together as i dont want to be stuck trying to sell just the pod/adapter.

also im still not convinced that they are only worth 250. especially if i have to pay for and organise posting.

mate, i'm extremely intrested in the computer and controller. only thing is... will it work on the older model RB20? if it will i'll take it. if not then do you know of where i can get one that will.

Sold the afm and pod.

KIL08S: yes the powerfc is still available, but it doesnt come with the controller. i have absolutely no idea what the differences are with the older rb20. may have to ask around, im sure someone would know.

.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Block bump. $400. As above cyl 6 needs bore or sleeve.
    • I would think making the argument that the travel is limited by a spring flexing against a spring perch as "the same method". Later on in the document they do state that the spring can't bind on full bump travel and cannot come loose in full rebound travel as well. (which is all very sensible). The laws are actually pretty sensible and reasonable. It's just that the people who enforce and check them don't actually read them or know them accurately. "Oh, coilovers? Instant fail mate. Don't even need to look at it." - Guy who will be instantly reported by me. There is probably merit to people who do get defected for height also get defected for the suspension in that state that allows it. I did never consider the people who are complaining about coilovers being picked on are also running around at 50mm off the floor.
    • I think given SAU's knowledge of E85 we can strongly conclude that 10% ethanol in almost any situation is entirely fine. Almost all of the myths against E85 were overblown, let alone E10.
    • From your link See bold text, is this referring to damper settings, if so that may a issue for "some" inspectors, I cannot see aftermarket coilovers having the evidence that "must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original" Maybe just remove the adjustment knows and hope for the best???? Meh 5.2 Suspension travel In all instances, modifications to a vehicle’s suspension must ensure the integrity of the system and not compromise the ride quality. At least two thirds of the original suspension travel should be maintained in both directions (rebound (i.e. extension) and bump (i.e. compression)), and rebound must be limited by the same method used by the vehicle manufacturer or if this is not practicable due to the nature of the modification, an equivalent method. If an alternative method is used, evidence must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original.
    • They actually don't - They adhere to VSB14 rules just like Victoria. The rules are against CABIN adjustable height, and it quite clearly states that the height has to be within parameters. I asked the VASS engineer to confirm this when I got my car engineered and they refused to engineer the coilovers because they didn't meet the requirements for requiring engineering. (mine are height adjustable.) People "Not wanting to bother" with "Actually reading/knowing/adhering to the rules" should result in fines and immediately losing the ability to issue blue slips and/or RWC's in Vic.
×
×
  • Create New...