Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Funnily enough, we have totally opposite experiences :S

Optimax the car runs fine, gives (relatively) ok fuel economy, smells nice when it burns....

Ultimate it keeps misfiring, stalling at idle and gives really bad economy.

Bizzare huh?

So yeah, we use optimax.

My laser runs on whatever bowser I pull up at, be it optimax, LRP, ULP or PULP. Havent tried diesel yet, but I dare say it will run on that too :D ... 1980s ECUs give no fark for fuel. Or o2 sensor readings. Or more than one map. My ECU is no more advanced than some little chinese kid with an abacus.

Since optimax is plentiful nearby, and where i shop i get discount vouchers (no plugs) I tuned on Optimax. Sure it may be the worst choice of the 3, but if you tune for the good stuff and get caught out it could be an expensive error. I actually found Mobil 8000 pretty good but they are consistently way more expensive and have no discounts.

With 220rwkw I don't need to hunt for a couple of kw extra on fuel type, but if the difference was 50kw I would consider it.

He said that they tested fuels and for the best tuning results it was.

1. Ultimate

2. Synergy 8000

3. Optimax.

:werd:

Ultimate is tops. I went off Synergy when I got a bad batch but its up there. I wont go near Opticrap.

Haven't you guys ever heard of Refinery Sharing? There is not one refinery for every brand in every city, so the petrol companies share.

You really need to check out your local supplies. Just because it says "Shell" on the servo doesn't mean that all the petrol sold there came from a Shell refinery. In Qld, WA and SA, Shell don't have 98 octane enabled refineries, so my understanding is they buy it from BP. Being Kwinana in WA and Bulwer Island in Qld. In NSW and Vic it is the reverse, the refinery at Clyde produces something like 25% of Australia's total petrol and the Geelong refinery produces about 50% of Victoria's petrol.

Mobil have 2 refineries in Australia, at Altona in Vic and Adelaide in SA. Only Altona is 98 ron enabled and it produces ~13% of Australia's fuel. In comparison Adelaide is a small refinery, doesn't have the technology to produce 98 ron and is currently not operational.

So my understanding is;

In Qld, WA and SA all Optimax, Ultimate and Synergy is refined by BP

In NSW and Vic all Optimax and Ultimate is refined by Shell

In NSW Synergy 8000 is refined by Shell

In Vic Synergy 8000 is refined by Mobil

As for Caltex/Ampol, the company owns and operates two fuel refineries, one at Kurnell in Sydney and the other at Lytton in Brisbane. Neither of them are 98 ron enabled. So I will leave Vortex out of further discussion. :Bang:

Bottom line, I don't think you can say that Optimax is this and Ultimate is that and Synergy is something else, it really depends on from where it is sourced.

I have told this to a number of people and some doubt it and quote all sorts of reasons why it can't be so. My answer is go to.......

http://www.bp.com.au/refineries/refineries...es.asp?menuid=d

and read up on Refinery Sharing.

Hope that helps

how long has BP ultimate been around for? I have used optimax for about 3 years and have had no problem with it, in fact i wont use anything else, unless you guys prove me otherwise. I tuned my car on optimax and it made 323.5 kw at all four wheels with no problems..... Im shocked to see that there are so many people against optimax. Silverwater Automotive certainly dont have problems with it...

BP Ultimate is a newer product yeah?

TG

So some people are saying there is a more consistent 98 octane in Ultimate, my dyno tuners think the same about Ultimate as their experience with Ultimate is that it has allowed them to tune harder.

I am getting my car Re Dyno tuned in about 2 weeks once the guys are back from Jamobree. I'll post the results between Optimax & Ultimate.

Until then i wont dis optimax but will certainly take in consideration to a lot of negative stories i've heard about Optimax and not a single negative comment about Ultimate.

Ultimate will do me fine, I wish there was a good 100 octane fuel at the pump, i'd love to use that....

Haven't you guys ever heard of Refinery Sharing? There is not one refinery for every brand in every city, so the petrol companies share.

You really need to check out your local supplies. Just because it says "Shell" on the servo doesn't mean that all the petrol sold there came from a Shell refinery. In Qld, WA and SA, Shell don't have 98 octane enabled refineries, so my understanding is they buy it from BP. Being Kwinana in WA and Bulwer Island in Qld. In NSW and Vic it is the reverse, the refinery at Clyde produces something like 25% of Australia's total petrol and the Geelong refinery produces about 50% of Victoria's petrol.

Mobil have 2 refineries in Australia, at Altona in Vic and Adelaide in SA. Only Altona is 98 ron enabled and it produces ~13% of Australia's fuel. In comparison Adelaide is a small refinery, doesn't have the technology to produce 98 ron and is currently not operational.

So my understanding is;

In Qld, WA and SA all Optimax, Ultimate and Synergy is refined by BP

In NSW and Vic all Optimax and Ultimate is refined by Shell

In NSW Synergy 8000 is refined by Shell

In Vic Synergy 8000 is refined by Mobil

As for Caltex/Ampol, the company owns and operates two fuel refineries, one at Kurnell in Sydney and the other at Lytton in Brisbane. Neither of them are 98 ron enabled. So I will leave Vortex out of further discussion. :Bang:  

Bottom line, I don't think you can say that Optimax is this and Ultimate is that and Synergy is something else, it really depends on from where it is sourced.

I have told this to a number of people and some doubt it and quote all sorts of reasons why it can't be so. My answer is go to.......  

http://www.bp.com.au/refineries/refineries...es.asp?menuid=d

and read up on Refinery Sharing.

Hope that helps

But just because they are refined in the same place doesn't mean they're the same product surely? Shell spent millions on developing Opimax. Why would the others do the same when they could've just borrowed the recipe off Shell? Panasonic, Technics, and Digitor (Dick Smith brand) are all assembled in the same factory but produce very different products in terms of looks, reliability etc.

But just because they are refined in the same place doesn't mean they're the same product surely? Shell spent millions on developing Opimax. Why would the others do the same when they could've just borrowed the recipe off Shell? Panasonic, Technics, and Digitor (Dick Smith brand) are all assembled in the same factory but produce very different products in terms of looks, reliability etc.

OK let's go with one example only, sulphur content. People tell you that Optimax has higher sulphur content than Ultimate. It rots your engine, destroys your paintwork, makes your car smell like a dunny etc etc. Well the reality is excess sulpher comes about from two related reasons. Firstly the source crude that you get and the cracker technology that you use. They are related because old technology crackers can't use low sulphur crude.

Adding a few secret herbs and spices does not magically reduce the sulphur content. You have to upgrade the refinery (at a cost of many tens of millions of dollars), then you can use low sulphur feed and bingo you get lower sulphur content in the finished product.

Since BP admit to using Shell refinered fuel in NSW, it is therefore impossible for BP fuel to have lower sulphur content than Shell fuel in NSW.

Before the chemical engineers rip into me, yes I have simplified this down for the readers. Hopefully not too far for the experts.

Make sense? :D

Of course it makes sense. But doesnt prove that they're the same final product.

In my experience I can say that Ultimate is this and Optimax is that because it is what I have observed when using the fuel. To say Ultimate and Optimax are the same fuel besause they come from the same place doesnt make sense because I have experienced otherwise. :P

i remember on today tonight (yea i know very reputable) that some petrol companies add something to their fuel to identify it.

is this true and could this be why even tho the fuels are the same effects are different?

Of course it makes sense. But doesnt prove that they're the same final product.  

In my experience I can say that Ultimate is this and Optimax is that because it is what I have observed when using the fuel. To say Ultimate and Optimax are the same fuel besause they come from the same place doesnt make sense because I have experienced otherwise. :P

My real world experiences, we have 5 cars that use PULP and 3 of them see the dyno fairly often. I have used Ultimate and Optimax in each of them many many times, we have a very large Shell and a large BP nearby so the fuel is always fresh. In the last 6 months or so, the BP has had Ultimate, previously we used 100% Optimax. Since using Ultimate, I have never seen or felt any difference, on the dyno, driving daily, on the track, in the fuel filters when we replace them or on the spark splugs when we pull them.

Bottom line;

1. oil companies refinery share (it's a fact)

2. additives don't change the basic supply (if it has excess sulphur from refining, it will have excess sulphur when it goes into your tank).

3. personally I can't see or feel any difference

So we now buy according to the price when we need fuel, Tuesdays is cheaper at BP and Thursdays is cheaper at Shell. You can make your own judgement. :D

PS; remember this is Sydney fuel, I have obviously not done this in Perth where Ultimate is demonstrably superior, both from a crude sense and refinery technology. I would always use Ultimate in Perth.

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
    • OK, so regardless of whether you did Step 1 - Spill Step 2 - Trans pan removal Step 3 - TCM removal we are on to the clean and refill. First, have a good look at the oil pan. While you might see dirty oil and some carbony build up (I did), what you don't want to see is any metal particles on the magnets, or sparkles in the oil (thankfully not). Give it all a good clean, particularly the magnets, and put the new gasket on if you have one (or, just cross your fingers) Replacement of the Valve body (if you removed it) is the "reverse of assembly". Thread the electrical socket back up through the trans case, hold the valve body up and put in the bolts you removed, with the correct lengths in the correct locations Torque for the bolts in 8Nm only so I hope you have that torque wrench handy (it feels really loose). Plug the output speed sensor back in and clip the wiring into the 2 clips, replace the spring clip on the TCM socket and plug it back into the car loom. For the pan, the workshop manual states the following order: Again, the torque is 8Nm only.
    • One other thing to mention from my car before we reassemble and refill. Per that earlier diagram,   There should be 2x B length (40mm) and 6x C length (54mm). So I had incorrectly removed one extra bolt, which I assume was 40mm, but even so I have 4x B and 5x C.  Either, the factory made an assembly error (very unlikely), or someone had been in there before me. I vote for the latter because the TCM part number doesn't match my build date, I suspect the TCM was changed under warranty. This indeed led to much unbolting, rebolting, checking, measuring and swearing under the car.... In the end I left out 1x B bolt and put in a 54mm M6 bolt I already had to make sure it was all correct
    • A couple of notes about the TCM. Firstly, it is integrated into the valve body. If you need to replace the TCM for any reason you are following the procedure above The seppos say these fail all the time. I haven't seen or heard of one on here or locally, but that doesn't mean it can't happen. Finally, Ecutek are now offering tuning for the 7 speed TCM. It is basically like ECU tuning in that you have to buy a license for the computer, and then known parameters can be reset. This is all very new and at the moment they are focussing on more aggressive gear holding in sports or sports+ mode, 2 gear launches for drag racing etc. It doesn't seem to affect shift speed like you can on some transmissions. Importantly for me, by having controllable shift points you can now raise the shift point as well as the ECU rev limit, together allowing it to rev a little higher when that is useful. In manual mode, my car shifts up automatically regardless of what I do which is good (because I don't have to worry about it) but bad (because I can't choose to rev a little higher when convenient).  TCMs can only be tuned from late 2016 onwards, and mine is apparently not one of those although the car build date was August 2016 (presumably a batch of ADM cars were done together, so this will probably be the situation for most ADM cars). No idea about JDM cars, and I'm looking into importing a later model valve body I can swap in. This is the top of my TCM A couple of numbers but no part number. Amayama can't find my specific car but it does say the following for Asia-RHD (interestingly, all out of stock....): So it looks like programable TCM are probably post September 2018 for "Asia RHD". When I read my part number out from Ecutek it was 31705-75X6D which did not match Amayama for my build date (Aug-2016)
×
×
  • Create New...