Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

just a question for the ill informed

what is the difference between awkw and rwkw?

obviously the rwkw calculation is at the two rear wheels but awkw if at all 4 wheels so is the calcualtion different.

I must admit i am very interested to find out about this.

is anyone can fill me in i would muchly appreciate it

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/50701-awkw-vs-rwkw/
Share on other sites

just a question for the ill informed

what is the difference between awkw and rwkw?

obviously the rwkw calculation is at the two rear wheels but awkw if at all 4 wheels so is the calcualtion different.

I must admit i am very interested to find out about this.

is anyone can fill me in i would muchly appreciate it

When you put a car on a chassis dyno (roller or hub style) there are power losses, in the gearbox, the tailshaft universals, the diff, the driveshaft universals, the wheel bearings, the tyres and the rollers themselves. In a 2wd Skyline (like na R33 GTST) this works out around 50-60 kw, based on the cars we have tested. A couple of which we have also run up on the engine dyno confirm this.

Obviously when you add a transfer case, front diff, front drive shaft universals, front tyres and the extra rollers you loose more power. Around 20-25 kw based on what we see with GTR's.

So if you have a 280 kw engine, it will show around 220 rwkw and 200 awkw.

I should point out that there are no "losses", Newtons law applies, "energy can neither be gained nor lost". So the 60 kw is not "lost" it is transformed into other types of energy, in the car's case that's generally heat.

Hope that is of some help :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/50701-awkw-vs-rwkw/#findComment-1006141
Share on other sites

yeah that makes sense

so basically like when your talking about a rwd drive car and you can make an estimate of rwkw by working out an aprroximate powerloss percentage thru the drive train the same applies in the awd but there is more areas for power loss

btw whats the stock kw at the engine for a 34 model stagea series one and whats the awkw stock as well if you know

:D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/50701-awkw-vs-rwkw/#findComment-1006207
Share on other sites

so basically worst case your going to allow for about 80-90 kw loss on a stagea?

just trying to figure out what i will need to spend to get to my power figure i would like

finally convinced the missus to get an import and the stagea looks like the most logical car for us plus having the awd and turbo is a huge bonus

thanks for the quick replys guys

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/50701-awkw-vs-rwkw/#findComment-1006229
Share on other sites

whats the stock kw at the engine for a 34 model stagea series one and whats the awkw stock as well if you know :D

That's a good question mcnamg. I have seen 185 kw and 173 kw quoted for Stageas. I am going to run ours up on the 4wd dyno next week, while it is standard. I expect to see around 100 awkw. I will then drop the exhaust from the front of the cat and do a quick (and noisy) run to see what's in the exhaust upgrade. If I have time I will stick the Pipercros panel filter in and see what difference it makes at standard power, not much I expect.

I'll post it up when done. :(

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/50701-awkw-vs-rwkw/#findComment-1006230
Share on other sites

In a 2wd Skyline (like na R33 GTST) this works out around 50-60 kw, based on the cars we have tested.  

Just interested with your test data, was it tested using stock clutch or aftermarket clutch? and was it auto or manual? Cos my auto when it was 100% stock was suppose to have 184kw and it made 138rwkw on dyno, so I'd imagine manual example should made well above 140rwkw with a good stock clutch.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/50701-awkw-vs-rwkw/#findComment-1006546
Share on other sites

So if you have a 280 kw engine, it will show around 220 rwkw and 200 awkw.

SK, I dont know how you find the time to contribute so much to this forum!

Thank the great spartan air god you do!

My question is,

if my AUTOMATIC GTS4 made 170 RWKW (AWD fuses Pulled) on the dyno and ran 14.1@98Mph(0-60/2.6) at the drags, what sort of AWD KW do I need to make to get into the high 12's??

And, what would the difference in times be between AWD and RWD(fuses pulled) if I did manage to make 250 AWKW? (My long term goal for my Stock bottom end RB20)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/50701-awkw-vs-rwkw/#findComment-1006584
Share on other sites

Thanks heaps for all the information would be very interested to see what your cars power figures are like when you dyno it

when you post it up post the dyno sheet if u got it

can you also tell us what zorst u are using as well just to give us an idea of whats power it is capable of adding to the car

:P

you seem to be an absolute hive for information. I suppose its good that someone knows this information because if not we would still be trying to translate one of a million japanese car sites to english to figure it out

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/50701-awkw-vs-rwkw/#findComment-1006678
Share on other sites

Just interested with your test data, was it tested using stock clutch or aftermarket clutch? and was it auto or manual? Cos my auto when it was 100% stock was suppose to have 184kw and it made 138rwkw on dyno, so I'd imagine manual example should made well above 140rwkw with a good stock clutch.

Hi rs73, clutch is irrelevant, as long as it isn't slippimg of course. Auto's seem to loose around 10 kw more than manuals, if the torque converter locks up solidly maybe a few less. And lastly, all dyno's are different and climatic conditions make a difference (not withstanding DynoDynamics good attempt with Shoot Out Mode). So your 184 - 138 = 46 kw is well within tolerances.

Data source, we have run 2 X RB26DETT's on the engine dyno and then put them in the GTR and one RB30DET and put it in the GTST. Along with untold Holden and Chevy V8's (both big and small block). Plus over 30 Skylines (standard and modified) on the chassis dyno only. So I am pretty confident the data base is large and the results consistent enough to make a judgement.

Hope that helps :mad:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/50701-awkw-vs-rwkw/#findComment-1007098
Share on other sites

SK, I dont know how you find the time to contribute so much to this forum!

I only sleep 4 to 5 hours a night, take a look at some of the times I post at.

if my AUTOMATIC GTS4 made 170 RWKW (AWD fuses Pulled) on the dyno and ran 14.1@98Mph(0-60/2.6) at the drags, what sort of AWD KW do I need to make to get into the high 12's??

That's a tough call, average power makes more difference than the sinlge max power number and RB20's get narrow in their power band as you move up the max power ladder. I would think 200 rwkw would do it, but it might need 210 rwkw if the auto isn't transferring the power well.

And, what would the difference in times be between AWD and RWD(fuses pulled)  if I did manage to make 250 AWKW? (My long term goal for my Stock bottom end RB20)

My experience (and I am not a drag racer) is the traction from 4wd makes more difference than the power losses by a good factor. Your target of 250 awkw is getting up there for an RB20. That's ~410 bhp, I have only ever seen 1 X RB20 make more than that and it didn't have standard internals. Ours makes 225 rwkw with good average power, it is tricky to get off the line and you really need to be paying attention to keep it firmly in the power band. The auto and 4wd will assist you there.

Hope that is of some help :mad:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/50701-awkw-vs-rwkw/#findComment-1007099
Share on other sites

I only sleep 4 to 5 hours a night, take a look at some of the times I post at. I would think 200 rwkw would do it, but it might need 210 rwkw if the auto isn't transferring the power well.

My experience (and I am not a drag racer) is the traction from 4wd makes more difference than the power losses by a good factor.  Your target of 250 awkw is getting up there for an RB20.  That's ~410 bhp, I have only ever seen 1 X RB20 make more than that and it didn't have standard internals.  Ours makes 225 rwkw with good average power, it is tricky to get off the line and you really need to be paying attention to keep it firmly in the power band.  The auto and 4wd will assist you there. Hope that is of some help :D

Thanks, SK :)

If I can make 12's with only 210AWkW I will gladly reduce my expectations and COST ;)

Its easy to throw numbers around and 250 didnt sound too much to expect from reading ZOOM etc. on their experience with RB20's.

The Auto has been completely rebuilt with kevlar clutches , 2800RPM Stall etc so should do the job and handle any power the RB20 can throw at it.

AS my GTS4 is reg as a GTR I probably should put an RB26 in it and have an Auto GTR! :throwup:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/50701-awkw-vs-rwkw/#findComment-1010488
Share on other sites

attachment.php?attachmentid=22183&stc=1&thumb=1

Yuko, look at the A/F ratios at 60 kph, no wonder ours guzzles the gas. :headspin:

with the mods i got mine clocked 195awhp (145.411awkw) at 10psi.

What mods are there, sorry I know you mentioned it in another thread but I forgot....

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/50701-awkw-vs-rwkw/#findComment-1011002
Share on other sites

attachment.php?attachmentid=22183&stc=1&thumb=1  

Yuko, look at the A/F ratios at 60 kph, no wonder ours guzzles the gas. :headspin:  

 

What mods are there, sorry I know you mentioned it in another thread but I forgot....

Well according to his profile he's got a FMIC and a 3" exhaust... looking at the AFR doesn't look like he's got anything to correct the fuel, and it looks like it would really benefit from it :cheers: Add a bit of boost and it should make a fair bit more power again...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/50701-awkw-vs-rwkw/#findComment-1011088
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...