Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Apparently the cars push 147kw at the flywheel in stock form...

What are these cars capable of with full exhaust, air intake and boost. I understand that they have a ball bearing turbo capable of handling much higher boost that ceramic ones. How much can they handle?

Guess what I'm getting at is these cars would seem to be able to get into low 13 possibly hi 12's with full exhaust, air intake, and a good dose of boost I would assume 14 psi+ (at least more than the standard R33 GTS turbos can handle)? Around 200 rwkw seems possible for less than $2k spent on mods?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/50935-s15200sx-questions/
Share on other sites

but once ur pushing around 200rwkw u would be at the end of the stock turbo's capability i thiink yes?

my mates s14a has the mods mentioned in this thread and is boosted to only 12psi and i would think with a correct launch a 13 flat or there abouts would be possible as the thing really gets going when it comes onto boost. The advantage of having a 150kg odd lighter car i suppose when comparing to a skyline

The previous statement about not all them having BB turbos is simply not true. Don't know where that information came from. I should know, I drive one.

Anyway, yeah S15 are capable of making good power with relatively little $ investment. The big problem is though, once you get up to around 200rwkw, you can pretty much start counting the days untill the gearbox goes BANG! The gearbox is really the only weak link in what is truely a great car.

The 200rwKw gearbox thing is a bit false too... My s15 200sx before I returned it to stock to sell it was making 226.8rwKw at 1.4bar (>20psi) with the standard turbo and standard gearbox and bottom end, and saw quite a few circuit kays with no gearbox dramas at all. I know of a couple of cars that have run more through the standard gearbox with no problems for quite a while. It is a good idea to fit the nismo (or similar) engine and gearbox mounts to take some of the load off them.

For the initial question, with an upgraded fuel system, cams, cooler, computer (and a good clutch) the s15 turbo and internals quite happily make over 200rwKw without a problem at 1.2 bar (>18psi) without a worry. I had that as a daily driver/trackhack for 12 months with no problems at all. With only the computer, cooler, a bigger fuel pump and a full exhaust it was making 196.3rwKw at 1.2bar, but I wouldn't have wanted to push any more out of it at that time. Without cams and decent headers the standard turbo stops doing anything useful after 6200rpm, and at 1.4bar of pressure it is definitely at the limit of what it will make other than heat.

Just depends on how much you want to spend or how serious you are as too how much you get out of them.

Cheers,

Jae.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...