Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

okay so my motor is currently being pulled out to get at the spun big end bearing...doh

my question is this, whilst the motor is open and the bottom end is getting a makeover should I upgrade the cams with something like the tomei poncams? Is there sufficient gains to be made with aftermarket cams on a car running the stock turbo? Would the money be better spent elsewhere?

Also it is my understanding that I will lose the advantage of the VVT if I upgrade cams? is there a way around this?

My mechanic has an opinion on this I just wanted to hear what everyone else has to say...

thanks

(motor is an RB25DET)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/52578-to-cam-or-not-to-cam/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Tomei poncams are the biggest cam that will work with standard valve's, cam gears and VVT. They are certinely better then standard cams because their bigger.

Theirs a couple of guys on here with tomei poncams in their skyline they should give you a run down on what their like.

:rolleyes:

Jun

We have the Tomei 260 degree Poncams in the R34 GTT, it makes more power EVERYWHERE than standard. I can highly recommend them, worth about 20 rwkw max power and give a ~25 rwkw average power increase.

Tip, we found adj exhaust cam pulley is not required, their std timing was spot on.

Hope that helps :wavey:

Hey sk how are you going.I got a question for you.Is their still power to be coaxed from an adj exhaust cam pully when going cams?Or are they like you said dead spot on.

And sk i need ur help with wiring a z32afm into my r33gts-t S1 go to http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/sh...ead.php?t=52564 if you know or can help me.

Cheers and sory for hijacking this thread.

SK.

You're a bad man. You keep making me want to buy Poncams and everytime I decided against it, you post something like that and I want them again.

You suck.

Now some questions about them.

Is the 20kW increase with the standard turbo. When will my turbo run out of puff if I'm running these cams?

BASS OUT (I hate you SK :) )

We have the Tomei 260 degree Poncams in the R34 GTT, it makes more power EVERYWHERE than standard.  I can highly recommend them, worth about 20 rwkw max power and give a ~25 rwkw average power increase.

Tip, we found adj exhaust cam pulley is not required, their std timing was spot on.

Hope that helps :wavey:

great!...providing the head doesn't require any TLC i can fit a set of these into my budget...yay

another question (I'm going to whore my own thread)

What power output would justify going for forged pistons?

I am going to leave rods standard as I can't forsee ever wanting 300rwkw+

If the pistons are in good shape would you bother changing them to the aftermarket variety...?

Thanks for the input guys :jump:

SK.

You're a bad man.  You keep making me want to buy Poncams and everytime I decided against it, you post something like that and I want them again.

You suck.

Now some questions about them.

Is the 20kW increase with the standard turbo.  When will my turbo run out of puff if I'm running these cams?

BASS OUT (I hate you SK :) )

Me bad man, nope I just call 'em like I see 'em.

The old 20rwkw and standard turbo question, I don't have a real answer to that one. If you are at 1 bar and 200 and a bit rwkw then the turbo won't last to make the extra 20 rwkw anyway. Most likely the cams will lower the boost level by reducing the resistance. But at the same time give higher airflow for more power. I really don't know, haven't tried it, but it's logical.

Personally, I would upgrade the turbo before I did cams, but you already know that. :wavey:

on a motor that is already out of the car there is minimal labour costs to install cams (esp. when your getting mates rates) so that just leaves the cost of the cams...approx $1,000+

but a minor turbo upgrade including support systems, fuel etc is going to cost $2,500+

cmon Bass Junky...you know you want to...:)

sooo... cams now, turbo later?

great!...providing the head doesn't require any TLC i can fit a set of these into my budget...yay

another question (I'm going to whore my own thread)

What power output would justify going for forged pistons?

I am going to leave rods standard as I can't forsee ever wanting 300rwkw+

If the pistons are in good shape would you bother changing them to the aftermarket variety...?

Thanks for the input guys :jump:

My rule of thumb is 450 bhp (270rwkw), over that and I tend to do everything. This is because I just hate pulling RB engines out of Skylines, so I only like to do it once per car. So many guys have problems with pistons at or over that 250 rwkw mark, you can usually pin it down to tuning, but sometimes it's bad maintenance. Some might call it bad luck, but you really make you own luck as far as I am concerned.

My suggestion, if 300 rwkw is your max target, then I would go forged pistons and RB26 rods with ARP rod bolts. If you want to go over 300 rwkw, then I would go with forged rods as well. If you are happy with 250-270 rwkw then the std pistons may well be OK but you need to very confident in the tuning, keep up the maintenance and test often.

My 20 cents worth, with change :wavey:

I think a Skyline is much like a wife and a child.

A wife because you are constantly a slave to your Skyline. Making sure that the thing is happy, has the right htings bought for it and sometimes giving it a good going over!!

A child because if you aren't nice to it, it will cry and crap on the floor of the garage.

I thought I would squish the car bug before I started on the house... at this rate I may never get there...lol

I thought that also, but you will always end up buying something new for the car (well i do) and your house will never end up happening!! just do both at the same time :)

On another not if your getting tomei cams also considered getting a new tomei metal headgasket, as it will all have to be pulled apart anyway to fix ur problems.

I think a Skyline is much like a wife and a child.

A wife because you are constantly a slave to your Skyline. Making sure that the thing is happy, has the right htings bought for it and sometimes giving it a good going over!!

Yes but the Skiline doesnt follow you around after a thasing :cuddle: :69:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...