Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi

Today i got my car re dyno tuned after running BP Ultimate into it for 3 weeks. The car was previously tuned on Optimax and made 218 rwkw @12psi which was still pretty impressive.

Here is the Original Thread http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/sh...ead.php?t=50725

The cars performance mods are as followed:

r33 GTS25T 95' Series 1.5

T3/T4 HighFlow VL Turbo

GTR Front Mount Intercooler

GTR Fuel Pump

Apexi S-AFCII

GReddy Profec B Boost Controller

3" Exhaust Turbo Back

HighFlow Cat

MegaFlow Muffler Twin 2" Tip

K & N Pod Filter

Irodium Spark Plugs

Blitz Open-Atmosphere BOV

Brass Button Clutch

Locked Diff

9.5" Wide Rear Works Rims

BP Ultimate 98 Octane Fuel

Stock RB25DET engine.

Stock Headgasket, Injectors, Cams etc.

Here are the new results :cheers:

dyno_7.10.04.jpg

I was extremely impressed with these results with the fuel being leaned out even more in this tune. A 12 rwkw gain from simply a different fuel & leaner tune.

Boost maxed out @ 12psi as you can see & was down to 10psi @ 230 rwkw due to the boost controller & internal wastegate.

The next step will be Power FC & some injectors, up the boost to say 18psi - 20psi & i should then be up for some for some f*** off power :P heheh

Cheers,

It was 29

The Optimax Dyno sheet is here

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/sh...ead.php?t=50725

Yep, that makes sense.

Optimax, ambient temperature 25 degrees, inlet temperature 29 degrees

Ultimate, ambient temperature 25 degrees, inlet temperature 56 degrees

genor80r what does pulse do for u or is this first reading u have ever had - dont get me wrong that is a top power figure even if it was , just wanna know more about pulse and where u been with your skyer , to be so proud-newcastle

:thumbsup:mobil senergy8000 fuel nothing but guys-tested and proven

Be very carefull with 12 to 1 a/f ratios. If you get a dirty injector or your full pump starts to ware you could lean out to far. 12 to 1 does not allow any room for a buffer. I have mine just under 12 to 1...

Correct me if I am wrong guys, if so then I am back to the dyno to lean out...

You betcha.  Read mods @ start of thread, SAFCII is the piggy back ECU.

Here's the other Dyno graph too.

dyno_7.10.04_afr.jpg

Yep, that makes sense.  

Optimax, ambient temperature 25 degrees, inlet temperature 29 degrees

Ultimate, ambient temperature 25 degrees, inlet temperature 56 degrees

LOL well that just proves that there really ISENT a difference between the fuels.

Next comparision?

LOL well that just proves that there really ISENT a difference between the fuels.

Well with Optimax the car couldnt be tuned any more than 218 rwkw with 12psi due to pinging, the tune was maxed out for 12psi. The new tune with the better fuel allowed for a leaner tune which resulted in 230 rwkw. The temperate was hotter on 230rwkw yet still putting out more power with a leaner tune. If the IT was even cooler *ie, was 29* i cant see why i wouldnt get an even larger rwkw. Please correct me if i am wrong.

Cheers,

No, if the IT on the 230 run was set at 29 like the other run you would have got a lower power reading. Shootout compensates for differences in ambient temperatures, so if on the 230 run the IT was chaged to 76 degrees you would have got a higher reading than 230 coz its compensating for the apparent higher intake temperature, coz the hotter the air the less dense it is and the less power you will make in the real world

Ok fair enoughs INSTANT. The difference in IT temperature was 29 degree's, to how much rwkw difference that would make i dont know, but i might talk to the tuner today & see what he says.

This IT business is a learning experience for me, now you say the higher IT temp will give a higher rwkw on the dyno spit out.

Now just so i have this right, lets say the AT was 25 & the IT was 150 degrees & the car was making 200 rwkw on dyno rollers. The dyno then makes the final readout for rwkw much higher than 200 rwkw because 150 degrees is very hot & a cooler temperate would give more power rwkw. To what temperature does the computer work out it to be to get the final Max power reading? I'd love to know how this all works exactly.

This is a PM from Sydneykid to me.

Hi, the A/F ratios are great, good results from the SAFC and the tuner obviously knows his stuff.

The temperature comment refers to the differences in the inlet temperature when the ambient temperature is the same. Maybe you should ask the tuner, it may be something simple like the Optimax run was done with the bonnet open and the Ultimate run was done with the bonnet closed. Or maybe he had the dyno fan in a slightly different position.

What I am trying to do is to get the guys on the forum to really analyse the results. ALL of the information on a dyno printout is important and you must look at ALL of it so you get a valid comparison. You can not simply look at the power result and say wow that's better.

Hope that help

Cheers,

Ok fair enoughs INSTANT. The difference in IT temperature was 29 degree's, to how much rwkw difference that would make i dont know, but i might talk to the tuner today & see what he says.

This IT business is a learning experience for me, now you say the higher IT temp will give a higher rwkw on the dyno spit out.  

Now just so i have this right, lets say the AT was 25 & the IT was 150 degrees & the car was making 200 rwkw on dyno rollers.  The dyno then makes the final readout for rwkw much higher than 200 rwkw because 150 degrees is very hot & a cooler temperate would give more power rwkw.  To what temperature does the computer work out it to be to get the final Max power reading?  I'd love to know how this all works exactly.

This is a PM from Sydneykid to me.

Cheers,

Look at it this way, if the tuner did some work on ur car and wanted to show you how much power you have gained from his work, when i reality he didnt do didly squat, he can place the temp probe for the IT on the exhaust manifold and do the dyno run. So the actual intake air going into the engine could be 30 degrees but since the IT probe is reading 150 degrees the computer will give you a higher reading to compensate for the apparent higher intake temp it thinks there is.

Shootout is meant to used so that you can compare the power a car makes in the desert to another car in antartica, but its very easy to bs results 2.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I had 3 counts over the last couple of weeks once where i got stranded at a jdm paint yard booking in some work. 2nd time was moving the car into the drive way for the inspection and the 3rd was during the inspection for the co2 leak test. Fix: 1st, car off for a hour and half disconnected battery 10mins 4th try car started 2nd, 5th try started 3rd, countless time starting disconnected battery dude was under the hood listening to the starting sequence fuel pump ect.   
    • This. As for your options - I suggest remote mounting the Nissan sensor further away on a length of steel tube. That tube to have a loop in it to handle vibration, etc etc. You will need to either put a tee and a bleed fitting near the sensor, or crack the fitting at the sensor to bleed it full of oil when you first set it up, otherwise you won't get the line filled. But this is a small problem. Just needs enough access to get it done.
    • The time is always correct. Only the date is wrong. It currently thinks it is January 19. Tomorrow it will say it is January 20. The date and time are ( should be ! ) retrieved from the GPS navigation system.
    • Buy yourself a set of easy outs. See if they will get a good bite in and unthread it.   Very very lucky the whole sender didn't let go while on the track and cost you a motor!
    • Well GTSBoy, prepare yourself further. I did a track day with 1/2 a day prep on Friday, inpromptu. The good news is that I got home, and didn't drive the car into a wall. Everything seemed mostly okay. The car was even a little faster than it was last time. I also got to get some good datalog data too. I also noticed a tiny bit of knock which was (luckily?) recorded. All I know is the knock sensors got recalibrated.... and are notorious for false knock. So I don't know if they are too sensitive, not sensitive enough... or some other third option. But I reduced timing anyway. It wasn't every pull through the session either. Think along the lines of -1 degree of timing for say, three instances while at the top of 4th in a 20 minute all-hot-lap session. Unfortunately at the end of session 2... I noticed a little oil. I borrowed some jack stands and a jack and took a look under there, but as is often the case, messing around with it kinda half cleaned it up, it was not conclusive where it was coming from. I decided to give it another go and see how it was. The amount of oil was maybe one/two small drops. I did another 20 minute session and car went well, and I was just starting to get into it and not be terrified of driving on track. I pulled over and checked in the pits and saw this: This is where I called it, packed up and went home as I live ~20 min from the track with a VERY VERY CLOSE EYE on Oil Pressure on the way home. The volume wasn't much but you never know. I checked it today when I had my own space/tools/time to find out what was going on, wanted to clean it up, run the car and see if any of the fittings from around the oil filter were causing it. I have like.. 5 fittings there, so I suspected one was (hopefully?) the culprit. It became immediately apparent as soon as I looked around more closely. 795d266d-a034-4b8c-89c9-d83860f5d00a.mp4       This is the R34 GTT oil sender connected via an adapter to an oil cooler block I have installed which runs AN lines to my cooler (and back). There's also an oil temp sensor on top.  Just after that video, I attempted to unthread the sensor to see if it's loose/worn and it disintegrated in my hand. So yes. I am glad I noticed that oil because it would appear that complete and utter catastrophic engine failure was about 1 second of engine runtime away. I did try to drill the fitting out, and only succeeded in drilling the middle hole much larger and now there's a... smooth hole in there with what looks like a damn sleeve still incredibly tight in there. Not really sure how to proceed from here. My options: 1) Find someone who can remove the stuck fitting, and use a steel adapter so it won't fatigue? (Female BSPT for the R34 sender to 1/8NPT male - HARD to find). IF it isn't possible to remove - Buy a new block ($320) and have someone tap a new 1/8NPT in the top of it ($????) and hope the steel adapter works better. 2) Buy a new block and give up on the OEM pressure sender for the dash entirely, and use the supplied 1/8 NPT for the oil temp sender. Having the oil pressure read 0 in the dash with the warning lamp will give me a lot of anxiety driving around. I do have the actual GM sensor/sender working, but it needs OBD2 as a gauge. If I'm datalogging I don't actually have a readout of what the gauge is currently displaying. 3) Other? Find a new location for the OEM sender? Though I don't know of anywhere that will work. I also don't know if a steel adapter is actually functionally smart here. It's clearly leveraged itself through vibration of the motor and snapped in half. This doesn't seem like a setup a smart person would replicate given the weight of the OEM sender. Still pretty happy being lucky for once and seeing this at the absolute last moment before bye bye motor in a big way, even if an adapter is apparently 6 weeks+ delivery and I have no way to free the current stuck/potentially destroyed threads in the current oil block.
×
×
  • Create New...