Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Dont know if this really counts as performance or maintenance but i will put it in here anyway.

I had a compression test run on the R33 RB26DETT thats in my ceffy. Now most readings from a brand spankin new RB26 are about high 160+ or Low 170s or something.

Now i know when u do cam work and pistons and stuff that it will change the reading u get... BUT... will it change it so drastically that it would read 125psi across all 6 sylinders????

Can u guesstimate from that reading whats been done or not?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/54124-compression-test-readings/
Share on other sites

The main thing I'd be looking at is the variation between cylinders. If you've changed cams and cam timing then the reading are going to change, and sometimes drastically. The variation will tell you if one cylinder has done a ring land or has a bad bore etc. The only time this doesn't apply is when you've blown all the ring lands or fried all the rings, but this will be evident in other ways!

Yep as the others said, variance is definitely more important because the absolute readings of every gauge are different. I would try disabling the injectors as I found they deflated the readings by upto 10psi. So pull the fuse to the ECU or disconnect each injector if its accessible! Oh and, dont forget to have all 6 sparkies out when you do it, and also have the throttle wide open!

As long as its fairly even across all the cylinders they should be right. Should vairy about 1 - 3 psi max each cylinder.

 

:wave:

Jun

1-3psi max?

have you tested 8 year old motors which put out readings that close to each other?

i was thinking more along the lines of 1-13 :wave:

what guage do u use? guages i have used u cant even see 1psi difference lol.

1-3psi max?

have you tested 8 year old motors which put out readings that close to each other?

i was thinking more along the lines of 1-13 :D

what guage do u use? guages i have used u cant even see 1psi difference lol.

If your getting 13 psi difference usally indicates you are losing a bit of compression with worn out ring lands and it will only get worse....

eg: testing RB25

Piston 1 - 160psi

Piston 2 - 163psi

Piston 3 - 162psi

Piston 4 - 161psi

Piston 5 - 162psi

Piston 6 - 150psi - Doesn't look to good!

Maby you can get away with a little more slack but on an old engine you carn't have 1 cylinder down a fair bit eg 13psi down and the rest fairly even :D It can result in time for a rebuild.

Not sure on what guage it was but just compression test.

Had one RB25 with cylinder number 6 on 0psi compression !!! :headbang: - I dont know how the thing started, it ran like a hairy goat :uh-huh:

:D

Jun

cameron, most readings i have seen are more random than that! ie there not one cyl that is way out compared to the rest, they are all a few psi diferent from each other....and yeah cyl 6 usually lower (first to get damaged)

could be the head though (burnt valves etc) which means a lot less to fix than bottom end and i would even bother because it probably wouldnt be noticeable if there was a diff of say 8-10 psi in one cyl..

in relation to the ceffy, like cam said, if they are even readings and it makes good power dont worry about it at all... if anything do a leakdown test to double check.

guages/cranking speed/battery/auxilaries etc all make sure you will never get a reading like new unless you are just lucky and the guage reads high..

If your getting 13 psi difference usally indicates you are losing a bit of compression with worn out ring lands and it will only get worse....

 

eg: testing RB25

 

Piston 1 - 160psi

Piston 2 - 163psi

Piston 3 - 162psi

Piston 4 - 161psi

Piston 5 - 162psi

Piston 6 - 150psi - Doesn't look to good!

 

Maby you can get away with a little more slack but on an old engine you carn't have 1 cylinder down a fair bit eg 13psi down and the rest fairly even :D It can result in  time for a rebuild.

 

Not sure on what guage it was but just compression test.

 

Had one RB25 with cylinder number 6 on 0psi compression !!! :headbang: - I dont know how the thing started, it ran like a hairy goat :uh-huh:  

 

 

:D

Jun

your kidding right?It did have 5 other cylinders to push it along you know....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...