Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

just wondering if anyones knows the answers to a few of my questions...

all questions are related to a rb20 computer...

do they have speed limiters?if so what are they?

when cutting the speed sender wires at the back of the ecu... does it effect anything else?

i know it has rpm limiter, but what is it?

what is the boost cut set at?

what is the max. boost you can run (SAFELY) with stock internals,fmic and exhaust?

does anyone know the most power you can get with these mods?

cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/54125-rb20-questions/
Share on other sites

well i know you have a rev limiter at 7000 - 8000rpm

i dont think you have a speed limiter coz ive been off my clock and nearly hit the button thing

i dunno what the boost cut is set at... ive got a T04 and im running 15 psi with a stock intercooler...

i wanna get a bigger FM n try run 20 -25

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/54125-rb20-questions/#findComment-1060614
Share on other sites

limited to 180kmh, I know you can cut the wire although not sure which one it is on the cefiro may be different.

rev limiter @7600

not sure on boost cut mayny 14psi, I think most people will agree that its more your standard turbo going to crap itself if you run much more than 14psi through it as its got a ceramic exhaust turbine which is fragile. but speak to people and see what they say. I think for $3000, you can almost get away with a new turbo and ecu remapped which will better your chances at running more boost and up your power a heck of a lot.

but not everyones got $3k to blow in one hit.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/54125-rb20-questions/#findComment-1060715
Share on other sites

VLRB20:

Im assuming rb20 computer hasnt been remapped etc.

1. Yes they do have rev limiters. On mine its 7300-7500 revs.

2. Speed limit is alo rectriced to 180km/h on standard rb20's

3. Its wire #53 on the ECU harness to disable the 180 kph speed cut. It also disables the hicas. Whihc most guys disable anywayz.

4. With stock internals,fmic and exhaust(im assuming trubo bacj exhaust here) i would be running only 1bar max.. even that. Try and get it dynoed tuned b4 trying this thou. 40 bux compared to a new engine/turbo

5. Ive seen my mates on with same mods get 134rkw (dismell numbers i know)on 1bar boost. Soory man but its a sad fact of life with the rb20

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/54125-rb20-questions/#findComment-1060756
Share on other sites

I dont think the rb20 is bad at all, I have a few mods on my car and have taken out ss commodores, modified wrx etc, I have a fmic, 3in from turbo, hks2535, boost running about 1.2bar on a tuned rom. I would say you are half the way there just need turbo and tune. should be able to make around 200+rwkw. thats nothing to smirk at.

I recon you can tune your car with your mods for around 160rwkw, if you up the boost. thats around 220kw at the flywheel, pushing a car weighing around 1360kg is not to bad. power to weight of 6.1 kg/kw. you are going to be competitive against most cars you will run against, such as ss commodore, xr6, etc.

its definitley worth getting a run on a dyno if you can and see how you go but as ceffo said no more than 14psi seems to be the general concencus of the limit of your turbo.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/54125-rb20-questions/#findComment-1060822
Share on other sites

For 160-165rwkw, which is the absolute maximum you are going to get with the stock turbo you will need a full exhaust, pod filter, front mount, some kind of boost controller or hks actuator and run no more than 13psi as the stock turbo is at the edge of it's efficiency at this point and only makes heat after that and so the engine likes to ping and thats about it. And i ran about 16 degrees base timing. Pretty easy really. But expect your turbo to die quite quickly at these power levels. Mine actually died at after about 6 months on 12psi.

Stock fuel pump is fine at this sort of power, mixtures are fine but a little rich in the midrange though not by much and spot on at the top end (or atleast mine were at 163). AFM is maxing out at this level, injectors are generally running pretty hard with the stock pump too. for more power you need a turbo and management.

My car had no boost cut.

Cutting the speed sensor wire will effect the speed sensative steering as well and bugger up the automatic box's shifting if you have one.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/54125-rb20-questions/#findComment-1061565
Share on other sites

I'll agree with Dave on that one. I had my boost on 13-14psi, now its back on 12-13psi and feels heaps better. Im still running the stock cooler tho. And I got 142rwkw with that set up, but Im still running a stock dump pipe.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/54125-rb20-questions/#findComment-1061577
Share on other sites

god daveo that's a big figure for stock turbo.. should be nice in the cef!

As for speed cut I don't think the VL would have speed cut as it's aussie vehicle? I mean I've never owned a rb20 or commo but I don't see why it would have one (it's not an import).

My boost is currently about 13-14 and I think its slow (i'm getting used to it).. i'm starting to want a bigger setup.. sigh this is bad.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/54125-rb20-questions/#findComment-1061788
Share on other sites

as stated dont run anywhere near 1 bar boost on a stock turbo with no retune unless u like seeing what happens to an engine when it leans out

i thought id have a little fun one night and upped the boost to 16psi lol

soon as i hit around 5000rpm *blat blat blat blat* lol

straight back down to 13psi :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/54125-rb20-questions/#findComment-1062020
Share on other sites

Ah conversion. I thought it was a factory rb20 - oops that ain't possible.

Not unless he was lucky and got a prodotype Vl with an RB20 in it :D

But yeah, Im also running a RRFR (riseing rate fuel reg) so Im not overly worried about leaning out, just my fuel bill :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/54125-rb20-questions/#findComment-1063210
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...