Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 110
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Mate has taken out the mesh on both sides of his Z32 sensor & actually dynoed it! And guess what it made more power with the mesh removed, plus he actually flow bench tested with & without the mesh & picked up a bit from removing it! he actually went a step further & got some epoxy ribbon & made the plastic section where the wire is inside smoother & also flowbenched this which again improved flow & hp on the dyno! This car has really good A/F ratios now without a modified ecu other than the speed limit removed & made approx 209rwkw ( not on shootout mode either !)& ran 12.592@182kph! This is not BS you can check the time on http://www.drivelinechatter.com/dragladder_list.asp to verify! obviously it has other mods but mods to sensor seemed to help his a/f ratios

sends mixed messages to the ecu

i doubt removing both of the grills would send mixed messages. there is only one input - the AFM - to tell how much air enters the engine. this is measured after the first grill - and only measures how much air hits it to cool the wire

Originally posted by rev210

from the look of the mesh there may be as much as 3-4kw@motor in the top end by removing both. More if you have a higher output engine than stock (ie: big turbo)

What is all the talk about *both* or *two* pieces of mesh?

Mine only had *one* on the airbox side, which is gone now...

Maybe its just one of the differences in the models ~ 33 > 34?

Originally posted by rev210

the mesh is there to stop knuckle heads from poking screwdrivers into the hot wire. It is a restriction and you will increase airflow/hp by removing it.

It is not designed to 'smooth airflow' it is just cheap-ass(uneven and poorly constructed) mesh.

Do yourself a favour after checking your head for knuckles.

That is a classic ~ very funny!

Hope I'm not interupting, but I was told 2day by BD4's that the k&n, unifilters and others along the same line use oil in the sponge and that it could damage the engine if the oil leaks.....they recommeded HKS air filters ....as it used steel mesh rather than sponging with oil.

Is this true?

Apologies for goin off the topic.

I would imagine that the oil from these "filters" is no worse [or better] than the crankcase return which goes through the turbo anyway...

unless of course you have an oil separator / catch tank.

hotino and others, although the link below has already posted in a different thread. It is a very interesting short read about some brands of air filters, their effectiveness, and how their manufacturer can promote misleading information.

http://www.mkiv.com/techarticles/filters_t...st/2/index.html

edit: It might shed some light on some misconceptions going around as to which type of filter is best for your car and your AFM.

Guest TTZ32
Originally posted by giz01

Mate has taken out the mesh on both sides of his Z32 sensor & actually dynoed it! And guess what it made more power with the mesh removed, plus he actually flow bench tested with & without the mesh & picked up a bit from removing it! he actually went a step further & got some epoxy ribbon & made the plastic section where the wire is inside smoother & also flowbenched this which again improved flow & hp on the dyno! This car has really good A/F ratios now without a modified ecu other than the speed limit removed & made approx 209rwkw ( not on shootout mode either !)& ran 12.592@182kph! This is not BS you can check the time on http://www.drivelinechatter.com/dragladder_list.asp to verify! obviously it has other mods but mods to sensor seemed to help his a/f ratios

Definitely a worthwhile mod, from memory(been a while since I did it) removing the screens from the AFM increased the flow around 120CFM @ 10" water, it improved the flow by around 25%. I did it to improve spoolup more than anything, but it gave a gain in HP also.

It's all the little things that add up to a large gain, and the cheaper the better.

I don't think there is any advantage to an oil filter.

Hmm, well i cleaned my AFM.. made sweet f.a. difference so either it was clean or it didn't matter.

Found out that both screens on mine had already been removed... there was a tiny bit of dust lining in there, not that great, but probably just proves how crap most pod filters are at actually filtering air.

Guest TTZ32

The hot-wire element is actually self cleaning. After the engine is switched off, the ECU heats the element red hot for a second or so to burn off any crap.

But they still seem to get a build up of snot on them over time.

For interests sake, I've been cleaning mine occasionally over the last 4 years, using carb cleaner, no particular brand, and haven't had any problems. The first time i cleaned it, I used carb cleaner and a toothbrush to scrub it. The element is very robust and unlikely to be damaged easily.

I can't recall EVER hearing of a Nissan hot-wire falling apart.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...