Jump to content
SAU Community

  

86 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

I dunno if this has been done before, but I find that I am getting so that I cannot drive in city traffic any more if I need to be somewhere fast due to the increasing number of morons on the road.

Now, there is no denying that there are younger drivers in sporty little cars and they drive nothing short of badly - but what about those who get in their lane, *think* that they know the road rules and how to handle a car, but are just creating problems for all road users with their ignorance and arrogance.

I thought that I would run a serious poll to see just what people in the car community consider to be the worst driving practices. At the moment I'm trying to think of all the dangerous things for traffic conditions. Feel free to PM me if the options need updating.

It's just a shame that the mainstream media can't take this poll - mainly because of their bigoted thoughts against car people and seemingly refusing to log onto sites like this where WE get to have a say (Unlike the newspapers and TV where only the most ignorant and uneducated get their say - as the reporter/s of a story!)

Notes:

#4: Driver inattention has been proven to be the #1 reason for road deaths in the USA last year - this includes using a mobile phone, smoking, eating, and drinking. Speed-related was #3. Makes you wonder why Speed is still touted as the main killer on roads? Is the government saying that you're stupid and will believe everything they say?

#6: This includes a refusal-to-acknowledge other road users by not moving into the left lane; believing that they know all the road rules; or being intentionally ignorant of other road users.

#9: Fools who sit on your bumper because they lack the ability to see a problem and work around it AND lack the simple common-sense to realise that maybe the person in front either cannot get out of the way or is a #6. It also indicates to me that the tailgater does not have sufficient driving skills to know how to overtake safely. I will be happy when the law is changed to show that an accident caused by a tailgator is intentional in nature and should be charged as a minimum of Intentional Grevious Bodily Harm or Attempted Murder.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/57613-worst-bad-driving-practice/
Share on other sites

Probably inattention is number 1 danger, but tailgating gets on my wick so badly I just had to go for it. Most tailgating is from morons who've never had to emergency brake ever in their whole lives; they really have no idea what they're doing behind a steering wheel.

I don't think anyone can learn to drive properly on the public road. How can you practice stuff like emergency wet braking on the road? How many people discover how suddenly their car slides the first time they hit a gutter?

Accident rates would improve if everyone who got a licence had to pass a more advanced car handling test. It might not make a big difference to the petrol heads, but it would bring the drongos up to speed on the realities of how cars behave.

I have a real problem with banning young drivers from fast cars. Some kind of advanced licence for driving more powerful cars would suit me - a prawn at the wheel of an XR6T is a lot more dangerous than he is in a Focus. But age neutral, there are plenty of fifty year olds who still can't drive. They should be restricted to 4 cylinder Camrys like all the other beginners. Everyone should have to pass a test every 5 years: my mum is in her late 70's, she will have to pass a test at 85, her first since she got a licence at 17...

Of course graded licences are politically incorrect, & they're not revenue neutral, so it'll never happen.

Z

i voted arrogance for type of car.........

4X4's biggest hate...........saw someone at work nearly get run down by a speeding one today, yes, female driver..........

people who think that having a performance car gives them the right to speed, lower stopping distance and to overtake everything is another thing becomming a lot more common..........

it's elitist bullshite

drink driving is also another big one............

driving tired is a huge killer that i think should have gotten a mention.........

You're missing an option,

"Not driving to the conditions of the road"

I believe that is the worst driving practice, and covers people that are going way too fast for the road conditions, and those that are driving way too slowly for the road conditions causing frustration in those behind - which in turn causes them to do stupid things later on.

wil..

I left out 'Road Conditions'??? I had it on my bit of paper when I was drafting this.... DAMMIT - I must have forgotten to put it back in when re-writing the options (limited to 100 chars each).

This is definitely a big one to leave out, but I think I originally had it under 'Arrogance' #6

No - wait - it is there!! Option #4! Stupid how I can forget what I write sometimes.....

The_Paladin mentioned 'elitists' in a post - it just made me think of a car club (no names, but American Ford cruisers started in early 60's and still made to present day) I was a member of a few years ago here in Queensland, but refuse to have any connection with now. These people used to have their runs first Sunday of every month - and they would cause SO many problems on the roads! Dawdling - not using mirrors - and my biggest gripe was those who had a V8, but would not make it rev over something like 2,500rpm! They couldn't even get out of their own way most of the time! (I got out because their only focus now is fleecing members for money....)

driving to the conditions is a big one too..........

seeing people drive the usual 110kmph + 5kmph + 10% down to brissie when it's pissing rain and visibility is more than half'd because it's so fearce........

people not slowing down in the wet, using their lights when it's dark.....

now i'm just bitching.......

Whats with all this 4X4 bashing? I've seen more aggressive drivers in regular cars than 4X4's combined. Just because 4X4 drivers stand out more than agressive, reckless hatchback and sedan drivers it dosn't make them fair targets.

And NO I don't own a 4X4, I just beleve in freedom. Sure, if someone is genuinely being an ass in their vehicle, then they should be reminded that 'freedom of actions' dose not include pissing others off. But don't be like the Po-lice and single out the most obvious vehicles just because they look like a good target.

Whats with all this 4X4 bashing? I've seen more aggressive drivers in regular cars than 4X4's combined. Just because 4X4 drivers stand out more than agressive, reckless hatchback and sedan drivers it dosn't make them fair targets.

And NO I don't own a 4X4, I just beleve in freedom. Sure, if someone is genuinely being an ass in their vehicle, then they should be reminded that 'freedom of actions' dose not include pissing others off. But don't be like the Po-lice and single out the most obvious vehicles just because they look like a good target.

My gripe with 4x4 drivers is ONLY with those w*nkers who buy them and then the longest period they go offroad is when they take it into the shop to have a bullbar fitted so that the mum-truck can take their lazy-@ss kids to school.

I just believe that if you spend the money on one of those things then it should be used for the purpose for which it was built - if not, then whomever bought it is just an idiot who has no sense of economics or practicality at all!

I'm also speaking from the sense of a cyclist (a law-abiding one, I am - even if I am in the minority!). It is usually the case where it is a woman in one of these urban assault vehicles driving around with her *car* in gear and her brain in neutral - right before they try to turn me into road pizza!

I say: "Want a truck? Buy a freakin' truck!!"

hahahahahahahahahha urban assault vehicle is the perfect way to discribe them!!!

ok...........problems with 4X4's abridged......

1. Very dangerous in accidents, much higher chance of killing pedestrans and people in other cars......their hight bypasses many impact safty features of other cars........so mums buy these cars to drive around schools.......good one....

2. restricts vision..........too bloody hard to see past them when you're behind one.....yes busses are the same but there's actually a point to them...

3. Fuel consumption.............might not seem like an issue to you but it would if you're a marine getting his arse shot off in Iraq so the yanks can drive SUV's......

that's just 3....................people have no right at all to drive them in urban arears just because going off road is their hobby (and so few take them offroad) they've got just as much right as some on else hooning around in a NOS charged car with neons all around it cause the modding scene is their hobby...........

DEATH TO 4x4'S

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Meh, I think we're well into a new era of 90s JDM car. The days when spare engines and parts were cheap and plentiful are long gone. Therefore the YOLO approach is now massively difficult to justify, use and maintain. One should start to ponder whether an 800HP build is really justified, using stock parts. My thoughts? If you like/love the car and want to keep it and don't want to ruin yet another one, then be discrete about how much you ask from the stock parts. A 5 or 600 HP build is still a very fast car. If you want to go silly, have to have the 1000HP territory, then just drop all your cash, buy billet everything (or PRP cast block, etc etc) and use a bigger/more modern gearbag, and put a massive retrofit diff and axles into it. If you ruin any of those things then you're either ham fisted and deserve it, or you're pushing waaaay too far for the stock stuff anyway. The (presumably) young guys who are buying 30-35 year old busted arse Jap refugees and thinking they can live the life that was lived by others 20 years ago are deluded. Expectations need to be adjusted somewhat.
    • Just don’t be silly enough to think it’ll never happen either 
    • I take it that you bought the centre to suit the GTR axles? As in there was a plan, not just somehow lucky that it worked? It all looks excellent, by the way.
    • New engine block time. Up to you whether you want to keep going down this road with this project. Unfortunately a lot of these cars are like this. The road to getting these cars into decent shape is long and not fun for reasons that you're discovering. 
    • Essay time. First things first, an RB running stock turbo and boost levels shouldn't get so bad as to stall from reversion if the recirc valve has been deleted. Should get a little fluffy and annoying, but in my experience, not so bad as to stall. Of course, every car is a bit different, so it remains possible that stalling will happen. So, running with no recirc valve is somewhat of an option, for otherwise stock stuff. Atmo BOVs cause all sorts of shit, even on an otherwise stock setup. Only gets worse the higher the boost and the bigger the turbo. At that point you really need to go for a different ECU and no AFM. Rebuilding the stock recirc valve configuration is not hard. You just need a stock or aftermarket BOV with the appropriate adapter for the 2 bolt flange on the back of the J pipe, and to get/make an appropriate ~1" pipe to get the air back to the turbo inlet, and to possibly modify the inlet (if it is not stock) to take the recirc pipe back in. Not hard. Just takes some cutting and welding. Putting an R35 type AFM into the car anywhere is not as simple as just buying the AFM and throwing it in. You will also need to buy the appropriate boss that will then need to be welded onto the pipe where you're installing it. You can clearly see why by looking at the photo posted above. They are not a "simple" swap for a stocker. You can't put on in place of the stock AFM. You can put one in place of the stock AFM, if you get the mounting boss and weld it to some pipe and otherwise make that pipe piece work like the stock AFM housing. Or you can buy such an adapter, either complete with the 4 bolt flange for the air box, or without, for varying degrees of work needed to then make it fit your stock airbox or some pod filter or whatever you have going on. Oh, and the R35 AFM is not plug and play. The wiring is different, but changing that is trivial. The plug is also different so you either end up repinning the original wires onto the new plug, or you just use a short adapter. If you weld a boss to the cold side pipe, the cold side pipe really wants to be 3", otherwise the scaling on the meter can get a bit weird, but whatever the pipe size, it's not as easy as just using the (fully documented in the Nistune doco) simple method for choosing R35 AFM in X" pipe size in the software, because the scaling will already be a bit different. Anyway, all of this has been comprehensively worked through on the Nistune forums, so there is full knowledge available. I would use a Link/Haltech before I would bother putting an AFM into a cold side pipe. That's a lot of effort for a bodge. Nistune is great, can work well even at fairly high power levels, but you are stuck with the limitations of it being the stock ECU, which includes needing to use an AFM, which is not always convenient for every set of modifications. You have to have a think about what you already have, what you want to have, and decide early if you'd be better off jumping ship to an aftermarket ECU. This so you don't waste time and money doing things 2 or 3 times. Never heard of ECUmaster. Sounds like a backyard operation. If there are good tuners for it where you are, and it is a solid product, then it will be fine. We're only talking about an R engine here. Back in the day they all ran on crude nasty early 90s ECUs and they were fine. You don't need a rocket surgeon's ECU to run one.
×
×
  • Create New...